Quote:
Originally Posted by AznHalf
I've read through the entire post, and I'd really like to see complaints from actual owners, rather than the peanut gallery of want-to-be downtown condo owners, whose most constant supposed problem they have with these buildings are their opinionated view of it's physical appearance. Anything more substantive would be nice.
I think if there was such a big problem with the buildings, they'd obviously have problems selling the 3rd and 4th towers - which the opposite is happening. So, I'd have to say that the majority of purchasers have disagreed with your flimsy opinionated argument. Guess your opinion is just "nto great etc."
|
So, you're racking on other posters "flimsy opinionated argument" and yet your theory is that because CP 3 & 4 is selling, CP 1 & 2 are problem-free? In 2012, Claridge had 12 sites across the city and sold about 145 condos all year - that's an average of 1 condo sold at each site, each month. Hardly a sales volume to boast about - spoiler alert: Vendor's have been known to "fudge" the total number of sales on their on-site slaes boards/lists. You may have been one of the lucky Claridge owners to get a properly built suite, but if that is the case, I can assure you - you are in the minority.
Open the door to any Claridge building (CP 1 & 2, 700 Sussex, York St. Plaza, etc...) and the problems are obvious. Last time I was in CP 2, the poor workmanship was too obvious not to notice - the ceiling literally had waves in it (they attempted a flat finished ceiling), the granite was so thin I would be scared to sit on the countertops, my friend who lived there wasn't able to take hot showers at certain times of the day, and the list goes on and on. That's just one purchaser in one Claridge project. If I had recorded all of the times I heard complaints about a Claridge product (high-rise condo, townhome, etc...) I could have a book the sizeof the Lord of the Rings triology.