HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Today, 6:14 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I think the new District Schedules (C-2A, C-2D, C-2E) only allow the following:
- Dwelling Uses existing as of [force and effect date], except Mixed-Use Residential Building and Principal Dwelling Unit with Lock-Off Unit
- Mixed-Use Residential Building
- Principal Dwelling Unit with Lock-Off Unit
https://council.vancouver.ca/20260714/documents/phea1d_draft_ZD.pdf

And I think Josh White confirmed this in his June 23 Memo, which makes sense to require retail on lots you're trying to get retail built on, which is almost identical to how our "C" zones are written. It would defeat the purpose to permit multiplexes on lots the City is pursuing retail.

The main difference here is that this is the rare recent case that the zone is changed by the City. Previously you'd continue to have the old zone (R1 etc) and build like a multiplex until you change the zoning. I have not read the frontage minimums and that would be the real project killer, again. So you could keep your house and renovate it and stuff but not profit off it for single-lot residential redevelopment (which is what some folks are getting made about - limiting the redevelopment potential) - it would make sense to permit the old R1 rules for at least a laneway home.

"Staff recommend ground-floor retail requirements in retail expansion areas to promote viable opportunities for new businesses and to help achieve Village Plan objectives of walkability and completeness. Allowing new residential-only buildings on commercial high streets would have long-term impacts on business viability and therefore would weaken walkability, community identity and opportunities for social connection in Villages. "

https://council.vancouver.ca/20260714/documents/phea1_memo.pdf
Hm I wasn't aware this was the policy. I've always been a deregulation supply guy so I like where they're going with some of this, but I'd be pretty upset if I owned a house in the newly rezoned commercial and it burned down and I was banned from rebuilding the house I formerly had. IMO city-initiated zoning should always grandfather in the existing allowed structures. I wasn't entirely keen on the multiplex rezoning limiting SFH FSR either. My current property is just outside one of these villages and we were considering redevelopment. Thankfully this hasn't put a thorn in our side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.