HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Yesterday, 6:32 PM
galleyfox galleyfox is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2PRUROCKS! View Post
As a thought experiment let's say the Bears selected the South Works area to build a stadium. How would folks feel about it? It would be within the Chicago city limits and sate of IL but all the same drawbacks that folks have expressed about Hammond are the same if not worse (far away and difficult to get to for majority of wealthy fan base in north, NW, and western suburbs or portions of the city, former industrial site with with possible environmental remediation issues, few attractions or desirable developments nearby, poor transit access). If folks here are honest I bet those who are so outraged by the Hammond site would be ok with a South Works site. I think what really bothers most people is the phycological factor of the stadium being outside of Chicago and then outside of the State. I get it... I want the Bears to stay in Chicago but I don't really care about the state lines. As long as they are in the metropolitan area its seems about the same to me. I actually like the Hammond option better than AH. I go to AH weekly and drive past the old racetrack area. That entire area is just a bland suburb that has no visual connection to the city. The Hammond site is directly on the city's border with views of the Lake and skyline and a weird combination of postindustrial mystique and natural beauty with Wolf Lake and other natural areas nearby. I just think the Hammond site has more potential to still intergrate with the city than AH.
As a resident close to the South Works site, I think South works would be completely impractical for a stadium. I’ve thought so since the idea was proposed. Very difficult intersections and no direct interstate access, and neighbors wouldn’t be too pleased about impaired drivers from events speeding through residential areas


That said, Arlington Heights is impractical and immensely expensive with no direct interstate access.

Hammond has the Skyway at least? It needs a lot of money and I’m skeptical about the year round entertainment factor, but if Indiana wants to pay, then they are welcome to try.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.