HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2015, 2:47 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,447
174 Glebe Ave | 14 m | 4 fl | U/C

The applicant is seeking to redevelop two (2) lots of record with a single low-rise apartment building. The current use on the lot consists of a large 3.5-storey detached dwelling. The existing building was created many years ago by joining two (2) separate detached dwellings that existed, side-by-side, on the two (2) lots of record. A small brick garage and a garbage enclosure are located along the rear lot line. The remainder of the rear yard is paved surface that extends along the east side of the building toward the existing driveway entrance on Glebe Ave. All buildings and structures currently on the lot will be demolished as part of the proposed development.

The new building will be four (4) storeys in height (13.78 m) and accommodate a total of 17 units. In addition, a mechanical room and outdoor rooftop terrace are located on the roof of the building. The terrace is limited to a small area in the western portion of the roof. A total of 19 underground parking spaces will be provided – 18 spaces for residents and one (1) visitor space. The underground parking area will be accessed from Glebe Avenue. The underground parking area will also include 13 storage lockers and nine (9) bicycle parking spaces.

Development application:
http://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans/appDetails.jsf?lang=en&appId=__8V9759

Streetview:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@45.40367,-75...3m4!1e1!3m2!1svrVAr-3qp6Ek6cGZeseveQ!2e0

Developer website:
http://174glebe.com

Siteplan:


Rendering:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2015, 2:48 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,447
Who will speak for historic buildings in the Glebe?

by Andrew Elliot
Glebe Report Issue: October 14, 2011




Before 1974 you might have recognized the two houses depicted above as belonging to the stretch of Glebe Avenue that lies between Lyon and Percy streets. For many decades, that block has boasted a wonderful combination of large architect-designed homes shaded by mature trees. In 1910, this section was just starting to be developed, and two fine houses from that time were built near the southeast corner of Carling (now Glebe Avenue) and Lyon streets. Featuring a combination of the Dutch Colonial revival and Queen Anne revival architectural styles, the attractive two-and-a-half storey houses featured detailed brick and stone work, large bay windows, front balconies, semi-circular window surrounds, large projecting semi-circular and triangular gables with inlaid fish-scale shingling, half-timbering and dormer windows. This was the work of local architect/builder William D. Hopper (1885-1937). He and his brother, James Harvey Hopper (Hopper brothers), designed and built fine houses on Linden Terrace, Monkland Street, Clemow Avenue, Powell Avenue, Island Park drive, and in the Rockcliffe area. Hopper lived at between 1910 and 1925.


Western section


Eastern section, with Dutch Colonial Revival gable and projecting corner bay.


Window detailing

The house at 174 Glebe Avenue belonged first to builder William D. Hopper and then to Matthew M. Pyke. The one immediately west at 176 belonged to Leslie Jarvis, a dental supplies businessman who operated a shop at 104 Sparks Street. Leslie belonged to a very prominent Canadian family; noteworthy relatives included Ernest Jarvis, Assistant Deputy Minister and Secretary of the Militia Council, A.L. Fitzgerald Jarvis, Assistant deputy Minister of Agriculture, and Samuel J. Jarvis, the famed Ottawa photographer, who owned a portrait studio at 117 Sparks Street.

Jumping ahead 60-odd years finds these two houses being used as a seniors' nursing home. From 1973-1975, in an effort to expand nursing home services, the owner sought approval from the city planning department to join the houses together to create what would effectively be a row house, and to build an elevator at the back of the structure. Though the Glebe community was opposed, and fought the plan all the way to the Ontario Municipal board, the owner won the right to make the changes. Today, you will find the buildings empty, partially gutted and awaiting a proposal for yet another transformation.

This leads us to the following questions: Why should historic buildings be demolished when they have survived a century? Why can't historic structures be rehabilitated and re-used? What should proposed infill look like? Perhaps it is time we take the lead on these questions. We ought to clearly define to ourselves and others what our community should look like, then tell city planners and developers what we mean about "good" and "bad" infill. We must protect the attractive features of the neighbourhood streetscape that lured us here in the first place, and make it so others can enjoy the area a century from now.

Despite its run-down appearance, and despite a section of the interior having been already gutted, the building is overall still in good shape. Many of the original historic components are intact, including a charming little coach house at the back of the property. The changes made in the 1970s to the front section blend in very well with the original features. But if the building is left vacant for much longer, it will quickly deteriorate.

This leads us to the following questions. Why must absentee landlords leave historic buildings vacant for months or even years? Why should historic buildings be demolished when they have survived a century? Why can't historic structures be rehabilitated and re-used? Why should all proposed infill be higher than three storeys, when it clearly does not conform to the historic pattern of most Glebe residential streetscapes? Perhaps it is time we take the lead on these questions. We ought to clearly define to ourselves and others what our community should look like, then tell city planners and developers what we mean about "good" and "bad" infill. Not all historic buildings need be designated as heritage, but this doesn't mean we shouldn't care for them. We must protect the attractive features of the neighbourhood streetscape that lured us here in the first place, and make it so others can enjoy the area a century from now.

Andrew Elliott is an archivist, writer and architectural historian.

http://www.glebeca.ca/committees/heritage/glebe_ave_article.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2015, 2:50 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,447
New on the street: Condos offer lots of elbow room in the Glebe

Patrick Langston, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 26, 2014, Last Updated: June 26, 2014 10:42 AM EDT


At 174 Glebe Avenue, size matters. A new condo project in the heart of the Glebe, the smallest unit sold so far is 1,900 square feet; it fetched a cool $1.21 million plus parking.

“I tried to look at what people coming from 3,000-square-foot homes with big basements would need,” says Mario Staltari of MODA Development Corporation. “What they want is somewhere where they’re not feeling like they have to squeeze everything in.”

While there are a couple of units under 800 square feet, the Art Deco-themed, three-storey-building (plus penthouses) that Staltari has planned for 174 Glebe Ave. is clearly targeting those seeking space, quality and location.

“People who are interested are coming from beautiful houses in The Glebe and Manotick and the west end,” says Staltari. “They want a nice unit that reflects their hard work.”

Staltari, a commercial real estate broker by day, is building the condo on the site of his former Glebe Retirement Residence between Percy and Lyon streets. The residence closed in 2010 after the City of Ottawa, which subsidized many of the residents, terminated its contract following an investigation of complaints from residents and staff at the home.

The new, red brick and precast concrete condominium was designed by CSV Architects. Its large balconies and ground-floor terraces are meant to engage with the leafy neighbourhood of mostly traditional homes.

Floor plans

The smallest unit is a 635-square-foot, one-bedroom for $450,000. The largest is three bedrooms with a den and two and a half baths; it’s 2,850 square feet and listed at $1.795 million. There are also some combined units starting at 1,700 square feet that could be split and sold as two separate condos.

Layouts in the two largest units, Clemow and Monk, can be completely designed by the buyer. For a limited time, layouts in the other suites can also be designed by buyers with the exception of the kitchen and bathrooms. Most units have two full baths, and some also have a powder room.

The building, slated for occupancy in the spring of 2016, includes an elevator, rooftop terrace overlooking Glebe Avenue and, in the rear, ground-level patio space, grass and interlock.

Staltari originally planned to have 18 units but reduced that to roughly 12 to accommodate the demand for larger units. Five units have been sold so far.

The models

There are two model suites on Bank Street, although they are meant to illustrate finishes and not the layout or sizes of actual suites.

There are some upgraded finishes in the models, but most of the elements that would be upgrades elsewhere are standard here, including oversized baseboards and door and window casings. “It’s the high-end market I’m going after,” says Staltari.

Unit entry doors are solid, stained wood with stainless-steel trim. Many of the interior panel doors are eight feet. Flooring is a mix of oak and maple hardwood, wool carpeting and ceramic tile.

The two models have finished kitchens by Deslaurier Custom Cabinets, the supplier for all units. One of the kitchens, sleek and modern, features stylishly grey, slab-style cabinet doors, while the backsplash blends small and larger Carrara marble tiles.

The other kitchen includes some upgrades. The base cabinetry is walnut stained while the uppers have classic white lift-up doors with etched glass. The backsplash is glass subway tile.

Countertops in both models are quartz. Standard kitchen features at 174 Glebe Avenue include quartz or granite countertops and full-height upper cabinets.

The two model units also have fully outfitted bathrooms with standard items such as rain shower heads and floor-to-ceiling ceramic tile for both shower and tub/shower walls.

In the area

One of Ottawa’s first suburbs, the Glebe numbers among the city’s most desirable neighbourhoods with an enviable mix of fine homes, greenery, shopping, restaurants and pretty much anything else a modern urbanite desires, including that legendary spring ritual, the Great Glebe Garage Sale.

It’s also within easy walking distance of the Rideau Canal and Lansdowne Park, which is undergoing redevelopment and is now home to the Canadian Football League’s Ottawa Redblacks.


174 Glebe Avenue

What: A 12-unit condo project
Builder: MODA Development Corporation
Prices: Starting from $450,000 for a one-bedroom, 635-square-foot unit to $1.795 million for 2,850 square feet, including three bedrooms plus den. Condo fees start at $279 per month. Parking is $40,000.
Sales centre: 761 Bank St. By appointment only.
Information: 613-230-1900; 174glebe.com

http://ottawacitizen.com/life/homes/cond...os-offer-lots-of-elbow-room-in-the-glebe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2015, 7:02 PM
TMA-1's Avatar
TMA-1 TMA-1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 298
"Precast Conctrete". Riiight. Not a chance, copy writer!

The old building (beside the red walls and awning) is now gone.



174 Glebe from the rear D814315
by southfacing, on Flickr



Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
New on the street: Condos offer lots of elbow room in the Glebe


The new, red brick and precast concrete condominium was designed by CSV Architects. Its large balconies and ground-floor terraces are meant to engage with the leafy neighbourhood of mostly traditional homes.



http://ottawacitizen.com/life/homes/cond...os-offer-lots-of-elbow-room-in-the-glebe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2015, 8:47 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,080
Was there a typo in the word "concrete" or are you questioning the use of pre-cast?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2015, 10:59 PM
TMA-1's Avatar
TMA-1 TMA-1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 298
Questioning pre-cast. There's none, it's standard non-combustible poured-concrete-and-steel stud. Terraces on the roof (which one of the articles refer to), 2 private and one public, are quite large, too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Was there a typo in the word "concrete" or are you questioning the use of pre-cast?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:50 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.