HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #281  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2020, 11:09 PM
svlt svlt is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
The ideological hate for cars
They literally teach this in planning school. Or at least the one I went to. It's almost baked into the modern profession.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #282  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 12:10 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
so in this toll the metro core and make peoples lives more unaffordable plan, what happens to the person who HAS to drive through downtown even though that isn't their destination?

it isn't THEIR fault that 50% of the crossings have to go through this toll area. but i am sure the government wont care, and will love the even more money they get from those people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #283  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 12:17 AM
CivicBlues CivicBlues is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 947
NDP provincial government needs to put the kibosh on this before it goes any further. They can't be elected on a platform of affordability when the largest city in the Province seems dead set on going to opposite way.

Perhaps we should all be writing to our MLAs on our thoughts on this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #284  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 12:20 AM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
so in this toll the metro core and make peoples lives more unaffordable plan, what happens to the person who HAS to drive through downtown even though that isn't their destination?

it isn't THEIR fault that 50% of the crossings have to go through this toll area. but i am sure the government wont care, and will love the even more money they get from those people.
They might see congestion easing due to a yet-determined congestion pricing scheme, which, like transit that they wouldn't use, results in their commute possibly being better because folks that might otherwise be driving a car take a bus from the North Shore. Those buses were jammed up till COVID. They pay for transit via taxes but don't use it but feel the daily affect to their benefit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #285  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 12:22 AM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicBlues View Post
NDP provincial government needs to put the kibosh on this before it goes any further. They can't be elected on a platform of affordability when the largest city in the Province seems dead set on going to opposite way.

Perhaps we should all be writing to our MLAs on our thoughts on this.
I don't think you need to worry as everyone will have their chance in 2022's civic election when the plan will be revealed by Staff, and last I read in the Council docs is that this needs Provincial approval via the Charter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #286  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 12:38 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I don't think you need to worry as everyone will have their chance in 2022's civic election when the plan will be revealed by Staff, and last I read in the Council docs is that this needs Provincial approval via the Charter.
Sadly, there's more than enough idiots in Vancouver to vote the airheads who supported this back in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #287  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 12:58 AM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Sadly, there's more than enough idiots in Vancouver to vote the airheads who supported this back in.
I do not disagree and I'd be curious to know if it's due to the roughly 50% of Vancouverites that supposedly do not drive in single occupancy cars to get to work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #288  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 5:08 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I do not disagree and I'd be curious to know if it's due to the roughly 50% of Vancouverites that supposedly do not drive in single occupancy cars to get to work.
Probably. Everybody loves a tax that they don't pay.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #289  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 5:57 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I do not disagree and I'd be curious to know if it's due to the roughly 50% of Vancouverites that supposedly do not drive in single occupancy cars to get to work.
Which of course highlights a very strong case for municipal amalgamation. The fact that CoV staff and many on council think making decisions that effect the whole Metro area should reside with those who govern one small part of it. 50% of $675k people, out of a metro population of 2.5 million?

Does everyone going from the North Shore to UBC have to pay this if they go through downtown? Then the unintended consequence will be more GHG emissions as they detour to the Ironworkers bridge and take a longer route. Ditto with those going to Whistler from the airport.

And while 50% of Vancouverites may not go downtown to work, they may go downtown to watch a game, see a show etc. This would make all that more expensive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #290  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 6:27 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Which of course highlights a very strong case for municipal amalgamation. The fact that CoV staff and many on council think making decisions that effect the whole Metro area should reside with those who govern one small part of it. 50% of $675k people, out of a metro population of 2.5 million?

Does everyone going from the North Shore to UBC have to pay this if they go through downtown? Then the unintended consequence will be more GHG emissions as they detour to the Ironworkers bridge and take a longer route. Ditto with those going to Whistler from the airport.

And while 50% of Vancouverites may not go downtown to work, they may go downtown to watch a game, see a show etc. This would make all that more expensive.
This will likely be implemented during rush hour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #291  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 7:03 PM
scottN scottN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Probably. Everybody loves a tax that they don't pay.
Exactly. Commuters from outside vancouver love that vancouver businesses, landlords and homeowners pay for the roads and street parking downtown. Those commuters don't get to vote in Vancouver municipal elections which is why we are seeing this shift from property taxes to a congestion charge (assuming the congestion fees go into general revenue rather than into a new program).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #292  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 9:03 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicBlues View Post
NDP provincial government needs to put the kibosh on this before it goes any further. They can't be elected on a platform of affordability when the largest city in the Province seems dead set on going to opposite way.

Perhaps we should all be writing to our MLAs on our thoughts on this.
NDP already put the kibosh on one mobility pricing scheme...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #293  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 9:40 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo604 View Post
NDP already put the kibosh on one mobility pricing scheme...
Apparently the City has turned a deaf ear.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #294  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 10:25 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
it isn't THEIR fault that 50% of the crossings have to go through this toll area. but i am sure the government wont care, and will love the even more money they get from those people.
A reminder that this isn't the NDP proposing and tabling this. The NDP have already been clear that this is the COV's idea exclusively and they do not endorse it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #295  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 10:59 PM
WBC WBC is offline
Transit User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Metrotown/Downtown
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I do not disagree and I'd be curious to know if it's due to the roughly 50% of Vancouverites that supposedly do not drive in single occupancy cars to get to work.

1) As far as I know that number (50%) was based on surveys not the actually observed numbers. I would be curious to know if there is a better way to determine this other then ask people what they supposedly do.

2) Eventually some form of regional mobility pricing will need to be done to replace gas tax. I would support this but as a replacement for Translink's revenue not as CoV's slush fund.

3) After pandemic are we sure that all these people will return to their downtown offices? Are we sure we need all these people physically at UBC to "study"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #296  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 11:38 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by WBC View Post
1) As far as I know that number (50%) was based on surveys not the actually observed numbers. I would be curious to know if there is a better way to determine this other then ask people what they supposedly do.
The 50% figure comes from the census - so a survey, but generally regarded as an accurate one. The 2016 census showed 45.4% of City of Vancouver residents driving to work, 3.6% as passengers, 29.7% taking transit, 13.7% walking and 6.1% riding a bicycle.

In the 10 years from 2006 to 2016, the City of Vancouver saw the greatest increase in walk and bike to work of all Canadian cities (with a population of 100,000 or more). It had the highest proportion of the population walking and biking - the next highest after Vancouver at 19.8% was the City of Montreal with 12.5%.

Given the increase in biking in the past few years, and the improved facilities for cyclists it seems likely that the 2021 data will show higher bike use.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #297  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 11:41 PM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by WBC View Post
1) As far as I know that number (50%) was based on surveys not the actually observed numbers. I would be curious to know if there is a better way to determine this other then ask people what they supposedly do.

2) Eventually some form of regional mobility pricing will need to be done to replace gas tax. I would support this but as a replacement for Translink's revenue not as CoV's slush fund.

3) After pandemic are we sure that all these people will return to their downtown offices? Are we sure we need all these people physically at UBC to "study"?
Oh jeez here we go. Questioning UBC student numbers post pandemic means you’re questioning the viability of the Broadway extension. Also questioning post pandemic office worker numbers means you’re hinting at less office tower construction. Great questions if you’re having a normal conversation with someone in reality, but here? People will crucify your for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #298  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 11:47 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,782
I think the census data was pretty close to that, and unfortunately the 2021 census is going to be effed. I was really looking forward to it for work. B-line upgrades and the evergreen line..

I think there was some Downtown traffic data resulting from the viaduct studies that showed car traffic in and out of the area was the same as the late 60s.

When the study comes out in 2021/2022 I think we'll have a better picture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #299  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2020, 11:49 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,892
It really does come off as a slap in the face to those supporting Vancouver’s economy from the outside.

I am sure my brother will love it as an elevator repair man (who lives in New West) who needs to drive a work van for all his equipment.

Please come fix our elevators! But you also need to pay us for the privilege of visiting our peninsula...

Although I am sure that extra cost will just be added to the customer’s bill
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #300  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2020, 12:09 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
It really does come off as a slap in the face to those supporting Vancouver’s economy from the outside.

I am sure my brother will love it as an elevator repair man (who lives in New West) who needs to drive a work van for all his equipment.

Please come fix our elevators! But you also need to pay us for the privilege of visiting our peninsula...

Although I am sure that extra cost will just be added to the customer’s bill
Exactly. It will just drive up the cost of doing business inside the rarified air of the sanctimonious green congestion bubble.

Imagine that you need medical care at VGH or the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver wants to ding you and everyone who visits you. Called to jury duty? The ivory tower eggheads want their pound of flesh for that to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:25 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.