HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5901  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 7:28 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Kind of a moot point, unless we're ready to raze Produce Way and the Expo Line (which we aren't). Not much point yelling over spilled milk.
The option to connect downtown to Highway 1 via the Grandview cut has long since set sail. I never implied that was a viable solution now. At this point if you want to make a connection now it would require a tunnel connection under Commercial, Victoria, Nanaimo and the likes up on the hill to reach Highway 1 on the other side. Untimately your options for extensions on the flats will require the redevelopment of parts of Strathcona and Produce Way regardless. The only thing really holding it back are a bunch of grey hairs who don't want to pay more in taxes.
If the viaducts come down it might be another 50 years before a proper replacement is built.

Last edited by MIPS; Oct 25, 2019 at 12:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5902  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:14 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I'd say most of the problem for buses is the population increase: more residents = more pedestrians = more traffic lights & higher dwell times at intersections. Since we don't want to discourage walking, that means we need to either add limits for drivers or reduce driver/pedestrian conflicts.



Consider that "the grass is greener on the other side" may be in play here?

LOL no. Wish it was though. Better yet, wish I could provide a long laundry list of attractions that the other city doesn't have, (in number or scope) that we do, but ya...can't so much. In fact in some ways the reverse is true.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5903  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:17 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Really? Retail Manager, Pacific Centre at Cadillac Fairview; Senior Vice President, Office and Industrial, BC; Quad Real Property Group; Proprietor; Donnelly Group; Regional Director - BC & North Regions; Business Development Bank of Canada; Vice President, Asset Management; GWL Realty Advisors (among others) on the Board, and Senior Manager, Security and Life Safety; Cadillac Fairview; Manager of Member Services and Communications: Alliance of Beverage Licensees; VP, Senior Policy Analyst; Urban Development Institute; and Director of Government Affairs and Communications; BOMA BC among the members of the Policy Advisory Committee.

All businesses that pay property tax are members of the BIA - large or small. The Board and Advisory Board are elected by the membership, and reflect that mix - both large and small businesses, including some of the biggest landowners and developers in the Downtown.
I said COMPANIES. Those are PEOPLE.

And if you consider Donnelly Group as a large company-yikes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5904  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:32 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Number of cars entering downtown are decreasing while number of people increase using the roughly same number of traffic lanes. I think 3 lanes were lost in total in 10 years?
What about the number of delivery vehicles, buses and others? Have they been decreasing too?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post


Really?

I'm FOR retaining the viaducts, and this is ridiculous. Not catering =/= space not given.
Is a 2-lane Prior Street catering to vehicles? Is there space given for the kind of traffic in the future?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5905  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:34 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
I said COMPANIES. Those are PEOPLE.

And if you consider Donnelly Group as a large company-yikes.
They're PEOPLE representing the COMPANIES they work for. And the Donnelly Group probably has more entertainment venues Downtown than any other business, so their involvement in the BIA is a positive thing.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5906  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:36 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
its what the people want, those places are always busy. I prefer robson after 9 pm when you can look in the windows, no need to shop in them

What does "excitement" mean in your world?
It's not what all the people want, obviously.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5907  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:48 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610


Thanks. Interesting piece, but again the context of the data needs to be taken into consideration. Some of those areas, such as th East Village and Polk Streets are tiny areas (home to smaller, neighbourhood businesses) of the much larger central core. That is the equivalent of studying only the consumer habits of Richards Street in Vancouver.

The viaducts (Vancouver) are supposed to be a major road into the downtown core and the concern is for all businesses, particularly larger-scale businesses that may depend on at least reasonable automobile access. The materials mentioned in the article do not do that.

Did you notice this nugget that is from our neck of the woods by chance?


Vancouver, Canada
This study of shops in downtown Vancouver did find a net decrease in sales after the implementation of a separated bike lane. But the analysis relied on business surveys, rather than actual sales data, which might have led to a response bias among the merchants who took the biggest hit. The little sales data that was received "indicated that the estimated loss in sales was not as high as reported in the surveys."


Again, keep in mind that the article is a little biased.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5908  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:48 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
What about the number of delivery vehicles, buses and others? Have they been decreasing too?
I'm fairly confident that the numbers were labelled as "vehicles", meaning all and any types, since 1996. I should use the same terminology and drop "cars".

If vehicle numbers have decreased I'm not sure why the other vehicle types you mention statistically matter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5909  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 11:52 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
Also in that report when the bike lanes were piloted:

Economic Context
The study focused on collecting basic business economic data on rents, sales, vacancy and lease rates
that would indicate the impact of the separated bike lanes, as well as data on the frequency of shopping
visits by downtown or Metro Vancouver customers after the implementation of the separated bike lanes.
This data was collected in the second quarter of 2011. Other policy changes at all levels of government
that have impacted the downtown retail environment include:
The 2008-2009 national economic downturn;
Increased parking rates due to the introduction of the harmonized sales tax (HST) in July 2010
and the 14% tax increase for off-street paid parking implemented by TransLink;
Road closures and access changes due to the 2010 Winter Olympics;
The opening of the Canada Line rapid transit system in August 2009;
The fuel tax increase of January 2010;
Downtown construction that has altered traffic patterns;
Filming activity in the downtown core;
The re-introduction of buses on Granville St.; and
Stricter impaired driving rules.

Sorry to digress.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5910  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 12:33 AM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
They're PEOPLE representing the COMPANIES they work for. And the Donnelly Group probably has more entertainment venues Downtown than any other business, so their involvement in the BIA is a positive thing.
They do? So the Security Manager for Pacific Centre/Cadillac Fairview is representing the interests of the parent company? And what exactly would those be? How to keep those damn skateboarders off of our courtyard?

And what large scale business proposals are these people bringing to the table? Donelly Group is not shaping any large scale city policies any time soon.

If you want that, the Vancouver Board of Trade is a far better organization to look at. They are comprised of senior managers and owners of some of the largest corporations in the city.

They don't concern themselves with graffiti and litter the way the DBI group does.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5911  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 3:17 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
LOL no. Wish it was though. Better yet, wish I could provide a long laundry list of attractions that the other city doesn't have, (in number or scope) that we do, but ya...can't so much. In fact in some ways the reverse is true.
Elaborate? We could use more museums and a decent zoo and an NBA team, sure, but we're mostly average for our tier. Not a lot of amenities come to North(west) America yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5912  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 4:57 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
It's not what all the people want, obviously.
well obviously

But Vancouver has plenty of areas full of cafes, Burnaby, Coquitlam, New West, Surrey, The starbucks, the tim hortons, the whatevers are always busy well into the evening. That crowd doesn't need to go owntown to do what they want.

Anyway no one will ever answer what people want. A ferris wheel? A merry go round? more soulless clubs? More Karaoke? what what do people want lay it out I'm on board with anything



Maybe Calgary is buzzing but why whats buzzing? Ive never been there so please share. Do they have bull riding? is that excitement?

Vancouver as in Greater Vancouver has a hugely successful nightmarket in Richmond in the summer, again no need to go downtown. English Bay is packed in the summer time at sunset. I think English Bay needs more places to hangout, everything seems to close so early except starbucks. Hopefully all these new developments on or just off Davie will bring some more hangouts.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5913  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 5:31 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
What about the number of delivery vehicles, buses and others? Have they been decreasing too?



Is a 2-lane Prior Street catering to vehicles? Is there space given for the kind of traffic in the future?
Yes. Because you kept the 4-lanes of space. 2 lanes are just now permanently parking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
Thanks. Interesting piece, but again the context of the data needs to be taken into consideration. Some of those areas, such as th East Village and Polk Streets are tiny areas (home to smaller, neighbourhood businesses) of the much larger central core. That is the equivalent of studying only the consumer habits of Richards Street in Vancouver.

The viaducts (Vancouver) are supposed to be a major road into the downtown core and the concern is for all businesses, particularly larger-scale businesses that may depend on at least reasonable automobile access. The materials mentioned in the article do not do that.

Did you notice this nugget that is from our neck of the woods by chance?


Vancouver, Canada
This study of shops in downtown Vancouver did find a net decrease in sales after the implementation of a separated bike lane. But the analysis relied on business surveys, rather than actual sales data, which might have led to a response bias among the merchants who took the biggest hit. The little sales data that was received "indicated that the estimated loss in sales was not as high as reported in the surveys."


Again, keep in mind that the article is a little biased.
...Did YOU notice this nugget?
Quote:
the analysis relied on business surveys, rather than actual sales data
The study was in 2011-2015, the period where most of the DT bike lanes were being put in, the fewest people were likely to use the lanes, and the most people were skeptical about their benefits because of being new.

also:
Quote:
Prepared by planning consultants McElhanney and pollster Mustel Group, the survey determined that cycling accounted for 7.3 per cent of all trips taken in Vancouver in 2018, compared to 4.4 per cent of trips in 2013. The share of bike trips by those commuting to work within the city nearly doubled from 6.6 per cent to 11.9 per cent over the same period.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news...-in-vancouver-life-goes-on-chaos-averted

If there was a fall in sales of a few percent, that's gone now for sure. There's a saying- Build it and they will come?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Right. Still pushing for further separation at the open houses.

Expo is useful in the current plan. Pacific would be two lanes westbound and four lanes eastbound, the former being mostly local traffic. Dunsmuir cuts off at Beatty and becomes a cycling/pedestrian path; Expo can't connect to it without having Stadium-Chinatown relocate.

Our bridge cloverleafs and on-ramps will demonstrate that merging two/three lanes into one is like pulling teeth sometimes. Better to have 100% continuous lanes.



Which goalposts, where? Admittedly could've phrased it better, but it's accurate to say that the viaducts are more of an obstacle than an access point when you're walking; NEFC is no longer a suburban area, and a suburban grid doesn't really make sense.
WRT Costco, it's not really about easier access more than easier understanding of access. Spent twenty minutes walking around BC Place on the first go. The stairs don't help much - they're practically hidden.

A second level between Rogers and the "ledge" on Beatty makes sense; beyond Rogers, it becomes less of a connection and more of a plateau. What would the south and east towers connect to? The east one doesn't even get a sidewalk! No, the stadium and its evacuation routes are independent of the viaducts, and for a good reason.



Six of one, half a dozen of another IMO. A day may come when we remove one lane too many, but it is not this day.



Many cities have ring roads instead of downtown freeways. Given our unique geography, the Trans-Canada is basically half a ring.

Convergent evolution then. Oakland, Midtown, Century City - seems that North American metros are too spread out for one single downtown.
Bad wording. Not that useful would be a better term.

Why would you relocate Stadium-Chinatown? Grade? I'm not 100% certain of the exact layout, but I'm fairly certain it's not built under the Dunsmuir Viaduct. I'm thinking of only a 2-lane connector to Expo, while Dunsmuir as a whole is 5 lanes wide. Plenty of Room for everything you'd want to put there.

And if there's 8 lanes, 2 head Westbound towards Expo, and 6 onto the existing planned Pacific Blvd- 4 Eastbound, 2 Westbound. Where's the merging? Expo is basically just a mini Pacific Blvd that goes 1 way here.

10 lanes may admittedly be too much to try to fit everything on without merging lanes.

You might even be able to implement something like that after the viaducts go away- though you'd have to cut through the Skateboard Park. I just don't want this to be another case of the classic Vancouver game of building without the future in mind- even if you don't need it in the next 30 years, the likelihood is that this network is going to be permanent. If you really never end up needing it (ie. you never end up building bus lanes), that's better than the alternative.


Costco isn't much more difficult to find than anything else in Downtown in my opinion (I spent 20 minutes trying to find the BCIT Downtown Campus), but .
Not sure how removing the viaducts makes Costco easier to get to either, since it's on Expo- unless a direct connection is built from Dunsmuir to Expo, like my proposed 8-lane plan.



A ring road that gets only as close as 5 km before even Gastown? The border of Vancouver City Center is ~3.5km from Trans-Canada- and we're not even built out to that point yet!

Oakland and Silicon Valley could be argued to be largely due to San Fran probably being the one city more development un-friendly than Vancouver...also, Oakland has anchors (like its port). Midtown is kind of more like Broadway than Surrey- and Century City had Fox to spearhead its development. Surrey has one advantage- it's a potential Skytrain Hub. But we haven't even built that out yet.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5914  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 6:42 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
Bad wording. Not that useful would be a better term.

Why would you relocate Stadium-Chinatown? Grade? I'm not 100% certain of the exact layout, but I'm fairly certain it's not built under the Dunsmuir Viaduct. I'm thinking of only a 2-lane connector to Expo, while Dunsmuir as a whole is 5 lanes wide. Plenty of Room for everything you'd want to put there.

And if there's 8 lanes, 2 head Westbound towards Expo, and 6 onto the existing planned Pacific Blvd- 4 Eastbound, 2 Westbound. Where's the merging? Expo is basically just a mini Pacific Blvd that goes 1 way here.

10 lanes may admittedly be too much to try to fit everything on without merging lanes.

You might even be able to implement something like that after the viaducts go away- though you'd have to cut through the Skateboard Park. I just don't want this to be another case of the classic Vancouver game of building without the future in mind- even if you don't need it in the next 30 years, the likelihood is that this network is going to be permanent. If you really never end up needing it (ie. you never end up building bus lanes), that's better than the alternative.


Costco isn't much more difficult to find than anything else in Downtown in my opinion (I spent 20 minutes trying to find the BCIT Downtown Campus), but .
Not sure how removing the viaducts makes Costco easier to get to either, since it's on Expo- unless a direct connection is built from Dunsmuir to Expo, like my proposed 8-lane plan.



A ring road that gets only as close as 5 km before even Gastown? The border of Vancouver City Center is ~3.5km from Trans-Canada- and we're not even built out to that point yet!

Oakland and Silicon Valley could be argued to be largely due to San Fran probably being the one city more development un-friendly than Vancouver...also, Oakland has anchors (like its port). Midtown is kind of more like Broadway than Surrey- and Century City had Fox to spearhead its development. Surrey has one advantage- it's a potential Skytrain Hub. But we haven't even built that out yet.

No, useful. Check again - it takes the Yaletown/Beach traffic, so that Pacific westbound west of Georgia only needs two lanes. That frees up four (three standard lanes plus median/turning lane) eastbound.
Pacific westbound east of Georgia has two right-turn lanes and a straight lane. A larger Pacific would either have 3+ right-turn lanes trying to merge into Georgia's 2 (not good, especially with Metro Van drivers) or two straight lanes, which is kind of redundant; Pacific westbound at Burrard only needs one.

With the SkyTrain guideway blocking any rise in height, the only options for an Expo-Dunsmuir road are a brand new viaduct, a relocated SkyTrain, or a 20-25% grade ramp that closes off Citadel Parade. Best to stick with Georgia IMO.

Yeah, nobody wants this underbuilt. But if downtown vehicle usage keeps going down and transit keeps going up, there shouldn't be a problem; if the opposite somehow happens, the viaducts are going to be useless anyway.

---

More find-able: just walk down the Georgia Ramp and around the Arena. I find squares easier to navigate than squiggles, the only problem is getting the right address.

---

That's the point of a ring road - loop around the suburbs, bypass the city proper. To use examples, Paris' is about equidistant to the TCH, but D.C.'s Beltway would be out at Coquitlam and Surrey!

Midtown is Joyce-Collingwood, distance-wise. As for Surrey, it's set to become 25% of the metro, and would be either the terminus or a stop for the HSR. I'd argue that a city centre south of the Fraser is preferable to a million new commuters headed to Metrotown or the CBD.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5915  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 8:19 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Elaborate? We could use more museums and a decent zoo and an NBA team, sure, but we're mostly average for our tier. Not a lot of amenities come to North(west) America yet.
Agreed. Although I'd put us on the lower end of average.

But why must we settle for that? Why not be above average? Or higher?

We were once upon a time, but then things went sideways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5916  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 8:38 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
Agreed. Although I'd put us on the lower end of average.

But why must we settle for that? Why not be above average? Or higher?

We were once upon a time, but then things went sideways.
Still ranked among the top tourist destinations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5917  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 8:45 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
Yes. Because you kept the 4-lanes of space. 2 lanes are just now permanently parking.



...Did YOU notice this nugget?

The study was in 2011-2015, the period where most of the DT bike lanes were being put in, the fewest people were likely to use the lanes, and the most people were skeptical about their benefits because of being new.

also:
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news...-in-vancouver-life-goes-on-chaos-averted

If there was a fall in sales of a few percent, that's gone now for sure. There's a saying- Build it and they will come?

You can't say that surveys are unreliable source for data, then in practically the next line use surveys to use a base to say an initiative was a success. Can'y have it both ways.
Using surveys for a quantitative study is a slippery slope to begin with.

Also, an article quoting chief nimby Gordy Price, and Mayor Moonbeam's staffer? No agenda there or anything. Not to mention, the article is a puff piece in the first place. Even then, did you notice the trends of how many trips across each pathway? Not exactly earth shattering either way, but you could bet if those figures were true of cars you'd hear some hear stating "car usage is dropping like a stone, nobody is driving anymore" etc etc etc. By the articles own figures, trip rates have fallen (in some cases quite considerably) since 2016 (EXCEPT on the VIADUCTS-love the irony!). Don't see anyone calling for the demolition of the bike lane infrastructure.

#DoubleStandardMuch?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5918  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 8:46 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Still ranked among the top tourist destinations.
Amongst who exactly?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5919  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 9:06 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
Amongst who exactly?
Saw something earlier this week, I can't remember. Trip Advisor maybe? One of those things you see and ignore.

I really think you suffer from "grass is greener" syndrome.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5920  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 9:19 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
Amongst who exactly?
Probly this list...

Quote:
Welcoming around 4.56 million international visitors, Vancouver just ranked as one of the top destinations for North American travellers this year, according to Mastercard’s 2019 Global Destination Cities Index.

The annual list found that Vancouver was the 46th most visited city in the world and the 7th most visited city in North America.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/vancouver-most-visited-city-north-america

Vancouver is ranked 7th in North America and finished ahead of Montreal, San Francisco, and Washington DC. Baltimore and Minneapolis are ranked at 236th and 264th place respectively.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.