HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #19501  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 7:28 AM
WestCoastEcho WestCoastEcho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waders View Post
Some points mentioned by Michelle Babiuk, a Project Manager with TransLink, in a news article about the RFP for the 203 new skytrain cars.



Source

Anyone know what other companies also produce LIM trains? May be this is just a tactic to try to get a lower bid from Bombardier?
Kawasaki, Hitachi and Kinki Sharyo produces trainsets with LIM's. The Japanese trainsets use a overhead power line for power, but there's an installation of the Japanese-developed LIM trains for the Guangzhou Metro which uses third rail for power.
     
     
  #19502  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 8:49 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
there would be maintenance benefits for keeping the fleet all from the some company for training, parts, etc. i hope they take that into consideration for the RFP and they don't just go with the cheapest today leading to more costs tomorrow.
     
     
  #19503  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 8:51 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,013
a train stalled at nanaimo causing chaos in the morning commute. Anyone get stuck in it?
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #19504  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 12:22 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waders View Post
Anyone know what other companies also produce LIM trains?
https://blog.daryldelacruz.com/2013/09/06/list-of-linear-induction-motor-rapid-transit-systems/
     
     
  #19505  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 1:41 AM
Xerx Xerx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastEcho View Post
Kawasaki, Hitachi and Kinki Sharyo produces trainsets with LIM's. The Japanese trainsets use a overhead power line for power, but there's an installation of the Japanese-developed LIM trains for the Guangzhou Metro which uses third rail for power.
CRRC (the Chinese rolling stock manufacturer) probably got some technology transfer from Bombardier and the Japanese firms so they can also produce trainsets with LIMs if they want to. So, we can count on Bombardier, most of the Japanese firms (Hitachi, Kawasaki, J-TREC, and Kinki Sharyo) and CRRC as potential bidders on a Skytrain order.
     
     
  #19506  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:19 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,423
I only want to see Bombardier, as it will provide conssitancy and not confuse people. and if repairs or warranty needs to happen it has to be shipped back to china etc (there goes 3-6 months).
     
     
  #19507  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:40 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Getting anything from China would be terrible. may as well sell them for scrap within the first year.
     
     
  #19508  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:52 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
Getting anything from China would be terrible. may as well sell them for scrap within the first year.
Typical gwai-lo ignorance - they'll last three years at the very least.
     
     
  #19509  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 6:57 AM
Meraki Meraki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Write View Post
I only want to see Bombardier, as it will provide conssitancy and not confuse people. and if repairs or warranty needs to happen it has to be shipped back to china etc (there goes 3-6 months).
Given the vast differences between the MkIs and the MkII/III I don't think confusing people is something to worry about. People will get on a train that indicates it's going to the right place.

I wouldn't expect China, but I hope that the Japanese manufacturers put up a good game and make Bombardier step up and compete. Their MkIII design for Vancouver feels lazy and cheap compared to the MkII if you ignore the larger windows.
     
     
  #19510  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 7:17 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,587
Metro Vancouver bus stop named 'North America's worst' is getting its fix

Quote:
A bus stop in Metro Vancouver that earned an award for being the worst bus stop in North America last year is getting a much-needed retrofit this week.

The problematic bus stop is located on Lougheed Highway, at the intersection of Lougheed and Old Dewdney Trunk Road, in Pitt Meadows — just east of the Pitt River Bridge. It was a top-four finalist in StreetBlog’s “Sorry Bus Stops” contest before being awarded the top ‘prize’ in a landslide vote against another sketchy stop in Cincinnati.

...

In an email, the BC Ministry of Transportation told Daily Hive retrofits on the bus stop are now well underway, with concrete poured for a raised pedestrian refuge area so that pedestrians are positioned outside of the vehicle travel lane.

There is also new railing at the back of the area to provide a barrier between the pedestrians and the ditch behind.

When the weather cooperates, crews will add line marking and stencilling to separate transit passengers and multi-use path users.


The problematic bus stop on Lougheed Highway just east of the Pitt River Bridge. (Google Maps)


Renovation of the problematic bus stop on Lougheed Highway in Pitt Meadows. Taken January 17, 2019. (BC Ministry of Transportation)
     
     
  #19511  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:22 AM
WestCoastEcho WestCoastEcho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
Given the vast differences between the MkIs and the MkII/III I don't think confusing people is something to worry about. People will get on a train that indicates it's going to the right place.

I wouldn't expect China, but I hope that the Japanese manufacturers put up a good game and make Bombardier step up and compete. Their MkIII design for Vancouver feels lazy and cheap compared to the MkII if you ignore the larger windows.
I would imagine with an order of 200+ units, other manufacturers would find it worthwhile to invest money into adapting their existing designs for Translink.

I'm not exactly certain what's the difference between the Bombardier developed LIM's and the Japanese LIM's, but I would expect that since Translink says they were looking at other manufacturers, they had done their due diligence on compatibility.
     
     
  #19512  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:34 AM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
Given the vast differences between the MkIs and the MkII/III I don't think confusing people is something to worry about. People will get on a train that indicates it's going to the right place.

I wouldn't expect China, but I hope that the Japanese manufacturers put up a good game and make Bombardier step up and compete. Their MkIII design for Vancouver feels lazy and cheap compared to the MkII if you ignore the larger windows.
The thing is that MKII went though quite a few iterations itself.

Really, MKIII should have been MKII-C or something. I'm not sure what more they would add to improve it, though, enough to justify a new model.
     
     
  #19513  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:42 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,553
… and the new trains should have the same livery.
     
     
  #19514  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:52 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,780
Aha, public shaming works!
     
     
  #19515  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 10:14 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
I wouldn't expect China, but I hope that the Japanese manufacturers put up a good game and make Bombardier step up and compete. Their MkIII design for Vancouver feels lazy and cheap compared to the MkII if you ignore the larger windows.
I don't think Japan would give you an asthetically pleasing train unless you specified. They will however give you a damn good use of internal space.
     
     
  #19516  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 10:44 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,553
Autonomous Vehicles to be tested in Olympic Village and Surrey:
https://www.thestar.com/vancouver/2019/0...-driverless-shuttles-on-the-streets.html

https://www.ridewithela.ca/book-ride/

Maximum speed for test: 12 km/h (capable of up to 40km/h)
Will be separated from traffic (?!?) and operate in the westbound lane of West 1st Ave. (i.e. lane closure)
     
     
  #19517  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2019, 12:21 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Autonomous Vehicles to be tested in Olympic Village and Surrey:
https://www.thestar.com/vancouver/2019/0...-driverless-shuttles-on-the-streets.html

https://www.ridewithela.ca/book-ride/

Maximum speed for test: 12 km/h (capable of up to 40km/h)
Will be separated from traffic (?!?) and operate in the westbound lane of West 1st Ave. (i.e. lane closure)
Adcock said the Vancouver corridor would likely run from Science World to Granville Island and would be separated from traffic.

In Surrey, the corridor would link four sites, Simpson said: Surrey Memorial Hospital, Jim Pattison Outpatient Care and Surgery Centre, the SkyTrain station and the RCMP E-Division Headquarters.

...

Locations where the shuttles will be tested include Surrey Civic Plaza, Olympic Village SkyTrain station and the northwest corner of Manitoba and West 1st Ave.
     
     
  #19518  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2019, 8:38 AM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Autonomous Vehicles to be tested in Olympic Village and Surrey:
https://www.thestar.com/vancouver/2019/0...-driverless-shuttles-on-the-streets.html

https://www.ridewithela.ca/book-ride/

Maximum speed for test: 12 km/h (capable of up to 40km/h)
Will be separated from traffic (?!?) and operate in the westbound lane of West 1st Ave. (i.e. lane closure)
Probably traffic separation is like the Surrey LRT traffic separation.
     
     
  #19519  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2019, 10:29 AM
Xerx Xerx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
Given the vast differences between the MkIs and the MkII/III I don't think confusing people is something to worry about. People will get on a train that indicates it's going to the right place.

I wouldn't expect China, but I hope that the Japanese manufacturers put up a good game and make Bombardier step up and compete. Their MkIII design for Vancouver feels lazy and cheap compared to the MkII if you ignore the larger windows.
I wouldn’t count the Chinese out, in the past decade they’ve been making a push into the North American market. They’ve already gotten a few orders in the States. I think they tried to make a bid in Montreal but their lack of experience with rubber-tyre metros disqualified them.
     
     
  #19520  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2019, 11:19 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
Does Translink have more 40 ft novas that New Flyers, The city of Vancouver your rarely see a regular new Flyer? and the #7 Nanaimo Stn\Dunbar is a Diesel route for th next few months.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.