HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2018, 5:45 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
The thing to note is that Strathcona as a neighbourhood is that it doesn't have a missing middle. There are row houses, and townhouses, and a few small walkup apartments, There's quite a few small co-ops or multifamily units that aren't tall, but have most of their site occupied.
In 2016 Strathcona was made up of 4.9% row houses and 6.3% detached duplexes, which would probably be considered the "missing middle", for a total of 11.2%. Compared to the entire city of Vancouver, this is low - 3.5% and 18.7%, respectively, for a total of 22.2%.

Strathcona does have a much higher proportion of apartments though, at 81.2%, compared to 61.5% across the entire city.

This would imply that Strathcona isn't the best location to create new missing middle as there isn't very much to make denser. There are much better locations that have a higher proportion of single-family houses that can be densified better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.