HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1681  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2017, 5:18 PM
rickvug rickvug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
"Tight" spot? It's massive. They could fit way more than one tower in there
From http://www.burnabynow.com/business/too-soon-to-tell-impact-of-sears-metrotown-sale-1.1897378:

Quote:
In 2013 Sears unveiled a vision for its Metrotown property that included a new flagship store, five mixed-use, high-density residential towers and two office towers on top of podiums containing retail and commercial space.
Way more indeed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1682  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2017, 7:17 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
deleted / transferred as correspondance
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1683  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2017, 7:46 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilmoreStation View Post
It's too late now for Metrotown to redevelop itself. It's too costly to demolish Sears and the underground parking underneath to buiild a condo in that tight spot.

If anything, maybe start from Target, but that's not currently owned by Concord.

Given the housing market/prices in the area, it's probably more costly for them right now to have a Sears that's most likely not doing as great sales-wise, and a parking lot which, while used fairly often, is still losing you considerable revenue from what would be (30-40-50 storey towers worth of) units and retail podiums and office space rental.

But it's Concord we're talking about here, so they're not exactly hurting for more streams of revenue, and can probably afford to sit on the project for a while, as all the 'right-of-way' and easement issues get hammered out and sorted in the courts.

And it's not a tight spot by any stretch of imagination.
It's roughly the same size (overall area-wise) as the lot across the street (Bennett) in the lot between Benett and Imperial and Nelson and Marlborough where you currently 3 towers with 4 more under construction and/or planning stages for a total of 7 towers.
Which is what their own proposal is for.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1684  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2017, 7:48 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post

But it's Concord we're talking about here, so they're not exactly hurting for more streams of revenue, and can probably afford to sit on the project for a while, as all the right-of-way and easement issues get hammered out and sorted in the courts.
They've already stated publicly that they are waiting to develop the bulk of their Brentwood site before starting on Metrowtown. Probably a smart move now that Metrotown has been boosted in density/height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1685  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2017, 10:55 PM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,484
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1686  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2017, 4:55 AM
Tetsuo Tetsuo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,382
^^^ And then in 20 years the school will be repainted in bland white.

Seriously the BSB41 saves a lot of money on paint by making every building white with either blue or red or green lines. Burnaby South is a case example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1687  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2017, 2:42 AM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1688  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2017, 3:15 AM
Sheba Sheba is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilmoreStation View Post
Dated Mar 4, 2017 - we talked about this months ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1689  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2017, 10:13 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Yeah, don't expect that to be resolved any time soon.

Beaucoup dollars at stake for all parties involved....

(including the City of Burnaby itself which isn't even a party to the case in question, but who nonetheless have a lot at stake given the fact that its draft Metrotown "Downtown plan" is largely contingent on what happens there.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1690  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2017, 10:51 PM
VanK VanK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Yeah, don't expect that to be resolved any time soon.

Beaucoup dollars at stake for all parties involved....

(including the City of Burnaby itself which isn't even a party to the case in question, but who nonetheless have a lot at stake given the fact that its draft Metrotown "Downtown plan" is largely contingent on what happens there.)
Its no longer a draft Metrotown plan. the plan has been adopted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1691  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2017, 11:17 PM
Sheba Sheba is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Yeah, don't expect that to be resolved any time soon.

Beaucoup dollars at stake for all parties involved....

(including the City of Burnaby itself which isn't even a party to the case in question, but who nonetheless have a lot at stake given the fact that its draft Metrotown "Downtown plan" is largely contingent on what happens there.)
If anyone needs a refresher then check out Page 72, where we talked about this in depth. One bit that sums a lot of it up:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
I get a kick out of Concords argument about not believing they need to adhere to a stipulation they didn't sign to. When you purchase something with preexisting conditions those conditions are part of the purchase. Perhaps they are so used to getting their way that they didn't think they would be held to them. I agree for the best of site as a whole it's important that Ivanhoe gets to steer things, if Concord can't make the numbers work then they should've done their due diligence beforehand, or let Ivanhoe pick it up for it's actual worth.
I'm optimistic that they will work things out...but given what transpired with Concord and the Porteau Cove deal I wouldn't be surprised either way.
Has anyone managed to find anything on the first lawsuit? All I've seen is along the lines of 'this is the second lawsuit, the first one is making it's way through the courts'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1692  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2017, 10:03 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,472
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1693  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2017, 6:45 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,968
it's quite visible from the highway now. How much more does it have to go?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1694  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2017, 6:46 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
it's quite visible from the highway now. How much more does it have to go?
I think this one was pretty short, but a double from here for sure.

30 something floors would be my guess?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1695  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2017, 9:01 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,472
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1696  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2017, 9:51 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
It's very noticeable due to it's lonely location - for now. It is shaping up nicely with no complains from me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1697  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2017, 6:10 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,963
Milano as seen from the Sears rooftop parking at Brentwood.



Aug.12 '17, my pic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1698  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2017, 6:56 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
We have to start somewhere. I like the pioneering location of this lone tower south of Lougheed Highway, in an area which will soon be filled with towers, and Milano won't be so lonely anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1699  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2017, 10:28 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,472
Hensley
by Cressey near Lougheed Town Centre

Any other renderings out there?
Looks interesting.


http://urbanyvr.com/hensley-by-cressey-lougheed-town-centre-presales
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1700  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2017, 10:43 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,472
Follow-up on the expected sale of the gold Metro Vancouver office towers on Kingsway:

Room for more towers?
Sale of Metro Van offices paves the way for potential development
http://www.burnabynow.com/news/room-for-more-towers-1.21936746
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:52 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.