HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4581  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2016, 10:47 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,778
The Slow progress continues on the Camsell redevelopment.

[IMG]Camsel by Tim Taylor-Smith, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
     
     
  #4582  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:55 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
     
     
  #4583  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 2:29 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,008
^While I've never stepped foot in that building from the outside it's not looking so good.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #4584  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 3:37 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,005
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #4585  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 3:44 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,005
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #4586  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 4:00 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,005
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #4587  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 4:11 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,893
An announcement for Edmonton is forthcoming, I hear.
     
     
  #4588  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 4:42 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Yup...its officially official again.


This NDP Govt is stupid.
     
     
  #4589  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 8:10 AM
Kokkei Mizu's Avatar
Kokkei Mizu Kokkei Mizu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
What is $3 million going to get you anyway? Maybe a few brochures or social marketing campaigns?
     
     
  #4590  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:26 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
If I had to guess, I'd say this would be spent targeting companies in Vancouver who might consider moving elsewhere due to the insane rise in housing costs there

IMO Edmonton just can't compete on the same level as Calgary for the HQ market.. startups and smaller firms may be a different story though.. lower cost of living might give Edmonton the edge with them. But EEDC spending too much going after big HQs would be like giving money to Calgary to study moving the legislature.. just not going to happen

For those who disagree.. my question is, what do you think the city has done since the mass corporate HQ exodus of the 80s/90s to make the city a more appealing place for companies to do business and their executives to live?
     
     
  #4591  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:30 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
the fine print probably limits these funds to windmill companies, unicorn and rainbow manufactures, and social agencies.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #4592  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:36 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Too late to park and rethink/rename this one? not against any social housing component, but feel like anything done there right now will paint some more corners on what could be a much bigger, and better project.

A complete redo of the kennedale / industrial heights area would open up a blatchford sized plot of land for redevelopment within the city, and provide opportunity to put in proper more direct freeway routings for yellowhead and gretzky/manning, and allow for a new LRT station and TOD area between northlands and belvedere

Then at belvedere, drop the 'e' from point, collocate the Via and Greyhound stations there and that TOD can be true to it's name
     
     
  #4593  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:43 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
The three buildings I see best suited for res conversions would be CN, Sunlife and 9888. Not sure how likely the latter 2 are, but the exterior seems well suited for making inset balconies

locations are good too, the eastern front of Edmonton's redevelopment war is going pretty slow, having some more people close by will make new quarters developments seem less risky
     
     
  #4594  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:46 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,005
9888 is nearly full up and just fully renovated.

CN has a very challenging floorplate to work with, Strategic has tried many options and nothing 'works'.

Sunlife ain't going anywhere, anytime soon.

Enbridge has been looked at for hotel, apartment etc... but nothing sticking.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #4595  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:47 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
No loss on that old beast.. the interior is as bad or worse than it looks outside. an interesting space, but not worth saving

this one, is the real loss... cleaned up and it would have been a real asset to the neighborhood

     
     
  #4596  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:48 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,005
^bingo all day long. It is awful that we are taking this thing down for LRT staging. The last thing we need in that area is another vacant lot.

When will we get it?
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #4597  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:49 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post


That was some pretty ballsy descriptions of Abbottsfield. I don't disagree...I used to joke about needing to take a tire iron with me to the old mcdonalds next to the mall.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #4598  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:54 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
9888 is nearly full up and just fully renovated.

CN has a very challenging floorplate to work with, Strategic has tried many options and nothing 'works'.

Sunlife ain't going anywhere, anytime soon.

Enbridge has been looked at for hotel, apartment etc... but nothing sticking.
I always thought CN floors were just too small and low for modern office use, is there something else about the building that would impede a residential conversion?

Enbridge still has a decent look to it IMO, sort of our Nexen.. I'd say it has a good look for a tech company, but failing that.. heard rumblings about a few GoA moves, and don't think there's time, or the budgetary appetite for a new build. could be a good fit for them
     
     
  #4599  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 1:57 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,005
Conversions need to create 80-85% efficiency for rentable/saleable space for the numbers to work it seems and CN was in the 70s.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #4600  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 2:27 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
Wonder if they were trying to squeeze too many units in? seems like the two-fold win on office conversions would be making larger family sized suites

It would lower costs for the conversion, especially in plumbing. A 4 br suite doesn't need 4 kitchens and 4 bathrooms. Convert to all 1 br units and the pipes are everywhere...

And it's a lot easier to use an awkward part of a floor plan as an extra bedroom/office/den than try to figure out how to shoehorn a whole unit in
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.