HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > London Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2015, 2:41 AM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaradthescot View Post
Fair enough, then, I suppose you are the exception. To be honest, in my experiences with Targets they seemed quite disorganized, but I never went to the Masonville location. I am surprised they are pulling the plug on the entire operation. I assume at least a couple dozen stores must be profitable.
I know nothing about the inner workings of Target other than what has been reported in the news. However, I doubt any of the outlets were profitable up to this point, mainly due to the massive inventory issues. They likely had tons of overhead but low sales due to the inventory problems.

It's likely that some locations would have performed better than others, but the problem with closing many but not all locations is that they still would have had the overhead of distribution centers and distribution, and with far fewer stores to allocate the fixed costs across, the profit per store would likely have been worse if the number of stores was decreased.

They never should have opened nationwide so fast. That was ultimately what killed them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > London Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:16 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.