Quote:
Originally Posted by m0nkyman
When I was 22 I would have agreed with you. My 86 year old mother and 8 1/2 month pregnant wife think you need a bit more life experience. I'm going to side with them instead of 22 yr old me.
|
What's that supposed to mean? That I need more life experience before realizing that I shouldn't walk in rain or snow, and instead should taxi? Age is irrelevant to this discussion. I don't think it's right that you try to reduce my views to my age, claiming that at the age of 22 I don't have enough life experience to make such statements about people doing one of the most fundamental human acts - walking - as a means of locomotion.
If you have low mobility, then it's understandable that walking or cycling might be difficult for you and you'd use some other means of transportation. But if you are perfectly ambulatory and your destination isn't that far then why waste money or burn fossil fuels?
Considering how much people in this forum talk about and believe in making cities more walkable, by improving infrastructure not just for pedestrians, but also for cyclists and public transportation commuters as we need to get people out of the cars, living in denser, urban (as opposed to suburban) areas as traffic and cars cause a lot more problems to our health, our safety, the environment and our cities (among many more things), I'd appreciate it if you could explain how I'm wrong due to a lack of "life experience".