HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2026, 11:04 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougvdh View Post
It's a horrible idea unless you're going to cap the donation amount at something that is too low to possibly be a quid pro quo or even convey the impression that it could be a quid pro quo. Not accepting donations from corporations is a thinly veiled mask to buying influence, but it will end up just like Ottawa's municipal elections where the top people in orgs will all *individual* make donations.

If they want to do donations, they should set the limit to something like $1000 and you get your name on a wall or a paving stone somewhere.
I'd be fine if they limited the amount that could be donated, although $1,000 seems low, but I would limit recognition to a transparent list of donors. If they want to limit eligibiltiy to individuals and exclude corporations, I'd be fine with that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2026, 11:07 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,161
By the way, should this thread be moved to the Canada forum rather than the Ottawa forum?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2026, 11:31 PM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
By the way, should this thread be moved to the Canada forum rather than the Ottawa forum?
Probably room for a local discussion here as well as whatever people want to talk about on the Canada Politics thread imo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2026, 2:06 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
By the way, should this thread be moved to the Canada forum rather than the Ottawa forum?
No. While this latest aspect of it has national implications, this is still an Ottawa project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2026, 3:47 AM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
How does this not turn into Canada's version of Trump's ballroom?

We're finally spending more on defence and infrastructure. And the residence of the PM is actually a strategic asset. Not just a heritage property. Create a committee that determines design guidelines and recommends a budget. Pick one and go ahead with it. The Opposition will always complain. Ignore them.
Yes 100%. Feels like there is the poilitical capital and on brand to just make the right decision. Especially a total rebuild that means he never is close to moving in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #586  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2026, 4:01 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,540
Finally someone has the courage to fix 24 Sussex
The solution is imperfect, but if this is how we are going to get decent housing for our prime ministers, so be it.

By Mohammed Adam, Ottawa Citizen
Published Jul 01, 2026 | Last updated 3 days ago


At last.

After more than a decade of futility, Prime Minister Mark Carney has finally mustered the courage to lay out a plan to renovate, and possibly expand the crumbling 24 Sussex, which will restore some semblance of a decent home befitting the leader of our country.

Carney’s announcement that an international design competition would be held under the auspices of the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada is also welcome.

But in truth, it is a decade too late. We did not need to wait 10 years to make a simple decision on whether to fix the dilapidated home of our prime ministers. But this is where we are, and we will take Carney’s offer.

The stickiest issue with 24 Sussex has always been how to fund a new building, with some arguing that the federal government can’t spend millions of dollars on a home for politicians when the country is facing an affordability crisis, and homelessness blights our cities.

Ever the populist, Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre latched onto this, slamming any spending to fix 24 Sussex. “When I see homelessness on our streets and I see young people who are desperate to start families but can’t get a house to do it, I just think that the last thing on our minds should be 24 Sussex,” he told reporters.

This, from a politician who lives rent-free in the taxpayer-funded Stornoway, the official residence of the Opposition Leader.

Remember that in 2020, before then Conservative and Opposition Leader Erin O’Toole moved in, the National Capital Commission spent about $170,000 in repairs and renovations at Stornoway, including painting and replacing rotting floors. Poilievre has lived at Stornoway since he became Opposition Leader, and perhaps, if he cared so much about the homeless, he would have given up subsidized government housing. Or, invite a few of the homeless to share his 19-room mansion. Then we will take him seriously.

Just because we have homeless people, that does not mean we should make our prime minsters homeless as well. We can certainly take care of the homeless, as we should, and still build a decent residence for prime ministers.

In any case, Carney got around the issue when he announced that funds for the renovation would be generated through a fundraising campaign led by the non-partisan charity, The Rideau Hall Foundation. The solution is clearly imperfect, and perhaps a bit tacky. The idea of the government going out hat in hand, begging for donations from Canadians, most likely the wealthiest among us, is a bit tasteless.

As Carney said, 24 Sussex “is more than a residence.” It is a national building of historic significance that belongs to Canadians, not politicians. The building reflects our democracy and defines who we are – and if it is going to be rebuilt or renovated, it must be done with public funds. It is likely that the people who will end up paying the millions needed for the renovations are the ones with deep pockets, who, despite promises of transparency, will eventually get a return on their contributions. We may never know how this happens, because these things are done behind closed doors. After all, he who pays the piper calls the tune.

All that said, Carney is moving the country in the right direction on this issue. Building a new 24 Sussex, or renovating the current eyesore, restores some of our pride and dignity. Whatever it costs, it will be money well spent.

Canadians like to think of themselves as a modest people – and we are. But not fixing a rundown 24 Sussex actually makes us look cheap, not modest. There is no pride in your prime minister’s residence becoming a home for rodents. Now that Carney has given us a plan to fix the building, let’s all rally behind it.


Mohammed Adam is an Ottawa journalist and commentator. Reach him at [email protected]

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/fix-24-sussex
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #587  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2026, 2:02 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,540
Ottawa sets Aug. 15 deadline for companies to indicate interest in renovating 24 Sussex

Ian Bailey, The Globe and Mail
July 8, 2026 | Published 1 hour ago


The federal government has set a tight timeline for companies to register their interest in renovating 24 Sussex Dr., the official residence of Canada’s prime minister that has been closed for 11 years because of its physical decline.

In a statement Wednesday, Public Services and Procurement Canada announced an Aug. 15 deadline and said it will soon be setting up the rules for the competition. A winner is expected to be announced by Canada Day next year.

PSPC spokesperson Jean-Francois Létourneau said in the statement that additional details about the competition process will be released this fall.

In late June, Prime Minister Mark Carney launched the competition to pick a Canadian company to renovate 24 Sussex Dr., which was first built in 1868, and was home for prime ministers between 1951 and 2015.

Former prime ministers Jean Chrétien and Stephen Harper, a Liberal and Conservative, are expected to work together to help raise money for the project, the Rideau Hall Foundation has said. The charity is aiming to raise $50-million toward the renovation.

The Royal Architecture Institute of Canada is administering the competition, with a jury of architects, and the leadership of noted architect Moshe Safdie.

The public services department will establish the design and building requirements and qualified proponents will then develop and submit integrated proposals for the residence that housed nine Canadian prime ministers before it fell into such disrepair that Justin Trudeau was not allowed to live there when he became prime minister in 2015.

By Wednesday afternoon, there were 13 companies on a list of businesses interested in partnering for the project posted on the federal department’s website.

They were a mix of architecture, painting, building and millwork operations looking to team up for the competition, which calls for both designing the renovation and carrying out the required construction work. Prospective builders will have to submit commitments for their project budget and schedule.

Tara Castator of Toronto-based Househouse Architects Inc., represents one of the companies that has indicated its interest in the project. Househouse, which specializes in full-service home renovations, said partnership will be necessary for competitors because architects can’t be general contractors and general contractors can’t be architects.

“You have to work together to get the job done,” she said in response to e-mailed questions from The Globe.

Ms. Castator said she is 100-per-cent certain she will not end up working on the actual project because her company isn’t qualified enough on paper. “But I will probably still work on a design anyway for the fun of it,” she said.

“The dining room alone needs to be a work of art for the guests it will inevitably host.”

Mary Ellen Lynch, of the Toronto company Lynch+Comisso: Architecture + Light, said her company, which has also expressed interest, can lead or participate in the planning and design, but expertise is required for the construction.

“The project will require a large number of specialized sub-consultants on the team to create the design and a competent constructor and subcontractors to deliver it,” she said.

“If they are all on the same team, costs can be managed progressively throughout the planning and construction stages.”

“As architects who are routinely involved in renovation, restoration and adaptive re-use projects, we have followed the saga of this residence for decades,” said Ms. Lynch, whose company has worked on various heritage home renovations.

Although not listed among the companies, Canadian hardware giant RONA Inc. has indicated its interest in the project.

In a statement to The Globe and Mail, RONA’s media relations desk said the company would be willing to provide products, expertise and service required for the 24 Sussex Dr. restoration.

Stephanie Cadieux, Canada’s Chief Accessibility Officer, said she hopes that accessibility is factored into the eventual redesign of the residence.

Ms. Cadieux noted that a prime minister, their family, staff or visitors may live with a disability.

“When it comes to building and renovation projects, accessibility should be factored in from the very start so as to avoid costly future retrofits,” Ms. Cadieux said in a statement.

She said that the Accessible Canada Act, which outlines a commitment to create a barrier-free country by New Year’s Day in 2040, applies to all federally regulated buildings, and that includes 24 Sussex Dr.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-carney-24-sussex-drive-renovation-deadline/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2026, 11:57 AM
Ottawacurious Ottawacurious is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 558
So you can get a tax receipt.
And all donor names are public.
Max 5 million dollar donation. Total raised to date is 460k.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.