I initially posted this on the AB Highway Construction thread, but I thought it might get more attention here.
I was looking at
Alberta’s Economic Corridors and came across something interesting. While most corridors are the usual suspects, one unexpected inclusion was Hwy 11 between Red Deer and the Icefields Parkway (Hwy 93) at Saskatchewan River Crossing. While the section between Red Deer and Rocky Mountain House might make some sense considering the province want to twin that section, the portion to the west as it’s currently constructed does not as commercial traffic is prohibited on the Icefields Parkway, so from a commercial corridor perspective it’s a dead-end as there are no population centers west of Rocky Mountain House.
Source: https://www.alberta.ca/system/files/tec-economic-corridors-map.pdf
What makes it intriguing is on the
Fact Sheet, published August 2024, states:
A conceptual route to extend Highway 11 to British Columbia’s Highway 1 would reduce travel distance to Vancouver by 95 km, resulting in lower vehicle operating costs and reduced vehicle emissions. Additionally, this potential extension could alleviate traffic congestion and accidents within current National Park routes.
- On February 21, 2023, Transportation and Economic Corridors confirmed to the Central Alberta Economic Partnership (CAEP), that it has approved up to a maximum of $150,000 in funding to update its economic pre-feasibility study to extend Highway 11 to British Columbia’s Highway 1 (Trans-Canada Highway).
Its map also includes a dashed line from Saskatchewan River Crossing, through Howse Pass, to Hwy 1 north of Golden.
Source: https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/fd8e3023...eer-saskatchewan-river-crossing-2024.pdf
The issue is the connection falls entirely outside of Alberta provincial jurisdiction, with the proposed highway either being built in Banff National Park (in Alberta, but under federal jurisdiction) or British Columbia, the latter has expressed
no interest in the project. With relatively few British Columbians set to benefit from the project, I wonder it would even get approval if, hypothetically, the Alberta government offered to pay 100% of the construction costs. Has there been precedent?
None the less, it’s interesting to see an official document alluding to the proposal, the first time in decades.