Posted Jun 23, 2026, 11:47 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,591
|
|
I don’t think that reducing the frequency was the first choice of actions. However, in order to keep week-day frequency something had to give.
I believe that this is a staffing issue. I suspect that, previously, they had been using a lot of overtime to hide the problem, but the new GM realizes that that is not a sustainable plan. Yes, workers are probably willing to take extra hours, with elevated pay, but eventually that leads to burn-out – and the total loss of that worker.
As unfortunate as it is, I feel that this was the right call to protect the workers.
It would be interesting to see some graphs of rider numbers for Line 4: By hour and direction; by day of the week; and by week of the year.
|