Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12
That has been your entire argument.
|
Nice try! My argument is based on a project that was well documented, planned in detail for four years, and unarguably in motion.
Just admit that canceling the bridge was wrong, and now we are in a much worse situation regarding the tunnel replacement, and there is literally a 0.00001% chance that the original project would have opened later and at a higher cost than this new 11 to 12 billion dollar boondoggle.
Also would be great if you addressed all my other points / information regarding comparative costs between bridges and tunnels, and how even if the original project doubled in cost and was years delayed it would still have ended up less than half the price with far more built (true rapid bus, 30m of upgrades, etc...) then what we have now.
Threaded Mode