HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3461  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2026, 2:03 PM
MastClimberPro MastClimberPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 76
Also, barriers up around this lot and its neighbour on Gottingen with further excavation activity.

https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.6615453,-..._ep=EgoyMDI2MDYwMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3462  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2026, 10:59 PM
markbeaver markbeaver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by MastClimberPro View Post
Also, barriers up around this lot and its neighbour on Gottingen with further excavation activity.

https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.6615453,-..._ep=EgoyMDI2MDYwMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
The 5513 Russell Street lot and the vacant one next door have been amalgamated into one lot and there’s a development agreement for a 7-storey building - guess it’s about to start excavation.

The three lots on Sullivan were discussed earlier in this thread, probably land banking by Steve Tsimiklis, very sad to tear down decent residential properties and leave them as vacant lots for who knows how many years…
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3463  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 11:01 AM
Summerville Summerville is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by MastClimberPro View Post
These three houses on Sullivan are down. Are they going to be bundled with the vacant lot on Kaye for a larger development?

https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.6615549,-..._ep=EgoyMDI2MDYwMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Yep. Same personality as in the other land assemblies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3464  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 5:25 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,192
IMHO it’s kind of shameful that this is allowed to continue, but not surprising. Too bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3465  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 7:53 PM
ArchAficionado ArchAficionado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 96
Many available solutions to this issue ...

(1) Disallow demolitions for redevelopment purposes when land banking until an active permit is held for the new construction

(2) Disallow "re-zoning" for tax purposes ... I.E. institute some form of land value tax or vacant lot tax in light of the fact that this is housing that's demolished

(3) Punitive fines for undeveloped land that was formerly developed if a new development is not started within a certain timeframe - I.E. ding Tsmikilis specifically for his BS on Young Ave, Robie, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3466  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 7:58 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,756
I wonder why some of these properties are still undeveloped after being emptied/demo'ed for several years. You would think in this market that they would be of interest to developers.

Last edited by Keith P.; Jun 9, 2026 at 9:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3467  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 11:28 PM
HalifaxRetales HalifaxRetales is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Halifax
Posts: 438
Does anyone know what is going on beside Irving at 599 Prospect?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3468  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:37 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The policies in these areas seem to have been driven by height limits for a long time but I don't think the outcome from that has been very good. It would be better for the area for Dalhousie to have a smaller footprint with taller buildings. Nothing crazy, but maybe 8-12 floors instead of 4-6. I think it's similar around that southern Barrington area. Narrow towers that could fit on the footprint of a small apartment block would be much more attractive than squat boxes. It is way better to have a 12 storey point tower for a neighbour than a squat 6 storey box.
I learned a lot from this CBC article about the new Dalhousie residence project on Henry St.:

First, I discovered that former HRM CAO Cathie O’Toole landed on her feet after her tiff with Mayor Andy and is now V-P Finance for Dal, one of the few parachute destinations that would result in a raise and maybe even some added pension benefits, who knows. Who says there isn’t an old girl’s network?

Anyway, the article reveals that construction of the residence was somehow tied to a Provincial operating grant of an additional $20.7 million that would otherwise have been lost, so build we must. Here’s an artist’s rendition:



Of course, the head of the faculty association is against it, presumably believing the money should have been shared with them. Ah well, what can you do?

The article also has this somewhat sad image of the Henry St victims on their way to oblivion:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3469  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:44 PM
ArchAficionado ArchAficionado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
I learned a lot from this CBC article about the new Dalhousie residence project on Henry St.:

First, I discovered that former HRM CAO Cathie O’Toole landed on her feet after her tiff with Mayor Andy and is now V-P Finance for Dal, one of the few parachute destinations that would result in a raise and maybe even some added pension benefits, who knows. Who says there isn’t an old girl’s network?

Anyway, the article reveals that construction of the residence was somehow tied to a Provincial operating grant of an additional $20.7 million that would otherwise have been lost, so build we must. Here’s an artist’s rendition:



Of course, the head of the faculty association is against it, presumably believing the money should have been shared with them. Ah well, what can you do?

The article also has this somewhat sad image of the Henry St victims on their way to oblivion:

Shame to see more century homes meet the wrecking ball. I know this is the nature of development but it would have been nice to see this residence places somewhere a bit less destructive to the existing fine-fabric of this street (e.g. in/around the parking lots on campus).
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.