Quote:
Originally Posted by IanWatson
Keith, you're one of the forum members who complains the loudest about the bureaucracy of HRM, but then out the other side of your mouth you're saying HRM should be "ashamed" for allowing an ugly development.
Properly regulating taste takes A LOT of bureaucracy. We should not go down that route.
|
It's not a matter of regulating taste. HRM Planning used to review designs and not automatically approve anything that meets just functional/dimensional requirements. There once were subjective statements of things like finishes and materials and compatibility with the neighborhood that had to be satisfied. Those are now all out the window apparently.
Threaded Mode