HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #22741  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2026, 1:29 PM
sguil1 sguil1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 844
https://www.fox8live.com/2026/04/18/amtr...-nearing-100000-passengers-since-august/

Amtrak’s Mardi Gras line exceeds expectations, nearing 100,000 passengers since August

NEW ORLEANS (WVUE) - Amtrak is soon to welcome its 100,000th passenger on the Mardi Gras Service line, surpassing initial expectations set when the Gulf Coast light rail service first launched last August.

Tourism leaders had projected the line would move 75,000 people across the Gulf Coast in a year. Eight months into service, the line already has exceeded that goal.

“It’s blown every expectation out of the water,” said Alice Glenn, executive vice president of New Orleans and Company.

Glenn said the numbers prove the investment is paying off and that more people are opting for train travel than anticipated.

Angela Lowe, a passenger from Pensacola, took her first ride on the Mardi Gras line from Mobile to New Orleans for $15. The trip took 3½ hours.

“But it went really fast,” Lowe said.

Before the first whistle blew, Lowe said she knew the line was different.

“As soon as you got in line, everybody was just talking about where they were going, what to go see, and their favorite places,” she said.

For Lowe, the stop in New Orleans was part of a longer journey that includes an overnight train to Michigan. She planned to spend a couple of hours exploring the city.

“I’ve got a couple of hours to kill, so I’m fixing to head over to Jackson Square and walk through the (French Quarter) Festival to check everything out,” she said.

Regional travel demand confirmed
Glenn said the service provides an alternative for regional travelers in the South and Gulf Coast.

“You don’t have to worry about parking or drinking and driving. You just get dropped off right in the downtown corridor and New Orleans is there at your feet,” she said.

“If we’re talking about proof of concept for whether or not there’s demand here across the Gulf Coast for rail service, we have proven that.”

Expansion plans in the works
The regional tourism industry is hoping to grow the line with stops in Baton Rouge and Pensacola and, possibly, running north to Jackson.

For Lowe, expansion would be welcome news.

“Not having this line meant I had to go down through Chicago to Virginia to Birmingham and it was a lot of changing,” she said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22742  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2026, 2:01 AM
York1 York1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 242
The first five months of Amtrak’s fiscal year (October 1 - February 28, 2026) the Mardi Gras train carried 60,400 riders. It had an operating loss of $5.9 million. $900,000 was paid by the federal taxpayers. $5 million was paid by taxpayers in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. The average subsidy per rider was $97.68. The average load rate was 61.5%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22743  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2026, 2:39 AM
sguil1 sguil1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by York1 View Post
The first five months of Amtrak’s fiscal year (October 1 - February 28, 2026) the Mardi Gras train carried 60,400 riders. It had an operating loss of $5.9 million. $900,000 was paid by the federal taxpayers. $5 million was paid by taxpayers in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. The average subsidy per rider was $97.68. The average load rate was 61.5%.
Sounds like ridership is well ahead of what was projected in the business model and currently at 100,000 for the fiscal year. I don't know the ins/outs but seems pretty positive for the region to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22744  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2026, 1:52 PM
York1 York1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by sguil1 View Post
Sounds like ridership is well ahead of what was projected in the business model and currently at 100,000 for the fiscal year. I don't know the ins/outs but seems pretty positive for the region to me.
Agreed. When it was first being discussed, I didn't believe the ridership would ever be what was predicted. It's great to see the trains are doing much better than they thought. Now if they could get the train to the airport and to Baton Rouge, it would be even better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22745  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2026, 4:55 PM
broadmoor broadmoor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 355
Quote:
Originally Posted by York1 View Post
Agreed. When it was first being discussed, I didn't believe the ridership would ever be what was predicted. It's great to see the trains are doing much better than they thought. Now if they could get the train to the airport and to Baton Rouge, it would be even better.
Sounds like the success so far is making a good case for the extension to Baton Rouge. I've seen it mentioned in at least a few articles covering the current route's high ridership numbers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22746  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2026, 8:26 PM
Chris from N.O.'s Avatar
Chris from N.O. Chris from N.O. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 760
I think I remember reading a few months ago that Amtrak at least was on track to make a profit for the first time ever in the next few years. So it's kind of surprising the extent of the subsidies per rider. I'd imagine that most of their profits have got to come from routes in the Northeast because there's no way people would be paying $115 to wipe out that subsidy on this route. maybe just repeating myself here but when it's really a good alternative to go from like Boston to DC on the train I think people are willing to pay more than they are for something that's more of a leisure route like this one is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22747  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2026, 10:04 PM
NOLAslimm NOLAslimm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris from N.O. View Post
I think I remember reading a few months ago that Amtrak at least was on track to make a profit for the first time ever in the next few years. So it's kind of surprising the extent of the subsidies per rider. I'd imagine that most of their profits have got to come from routes in the Northeast because there's no way people would be paying $115 to wipe out that subsidy on this route. maybe just repeating myself here but when it's really a good alternative to go from like Boston to DC on the train I think people are willing to pay more than they are for something that's more of a leisure route like this one is.

you are correct on Amtraks Northeast corridor, thats their bread and butter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22748  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:15 PM
broadmoor broadmoor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 355
Has anyone confirmed that those quoted operating costs are ongoing operating costs? Do they not include funds spent launching the service, or just related to it being a new service?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22749  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 9:36 PM
York1 York1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 242
When Amtrak says it turns a profit, it means only above the rail. Amtrak uses very little track that it actually owns and maintains. If the New Orleans - Mobile train had to pay for track and maintenance, the losses would be substantial.

The Northeast Corridor is the only place Amtrak 'shows a profit'. That profit is offset by huge losses on long distance trains.

This raises the problem Amtrak faces. Should the U.S. use tax money to subsidize the trains? Some say yes, since highways and airports are subsidized.

If Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama feel the money spent on the train is worthwhile, then there's no problem with them funding it. The problem happens when people living in Louisiana are asked to pay for a train connecting Milwaukee to Chicago, or people in Wyoming are asked to pay for a train connecting New Orleans to Mobile.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22750  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2026, 9:36 PM
Chris from N.O.'s Avatar
Chris from N.O. Chris from N.O. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadmoor View Post
Has anyone confirmed that those quoted operating costs are ongoing operating costs? Do they not include funds spent launching the service, or just related to it being a new service?
I can't answer that but I went back and looked it up and the service started in August and this is for the fiscal year starting in October so maybe that gives a hint? still kind of digesting what York said right above me
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22751  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2026, 2:16 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by York1 View Post
If Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama feel the money spent on the train is worthwhile, then there's no problem with them funding it. The problem happens when people living in Louisiana are asked to pay for a train connecting Milwaukee to Chicago, or people in Wyoming are asked to pay for a train connecting New Orleans to Mobile.
Any train routes shorter than 750 miles have to be supported by state funding as matter of law. As a Louisianian you are not paying for the Hiawatha route.

Long-distance routes (longer than 750 miles) are a service provided in the national interest, so everybody pays for them.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22752  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2026, 3:30 PM
York1 York1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Any train routes shorter than 750 miles have to be supported by state funding as matter of law. As a Louisianian you are not paying for the Hiawatha route.
Mostly right. Nearly $180 million dollars of federal money was used to upgrade and launch the New Orleans - Mobile train. It also uses $7 million in yearly subsidies from the federal budget. The Hiawatha route has so far received $73 million federal dollars to expand and update that route. So people from all over the U.S. are helping pay for the Hiawatha.

That wasn't my point, and I'm in favor of these trains.

The real answer isn't Amtrak in its present form. If the U.S. truly wants a train system that works, then they would have to have a major shift in the system, which is unlikely to happen.

In most European systems, the government owns the tracks and provides maintenance, while railroad companies run the trains.

In the U.S., Amtrak mostly runs on privately owned and maintained track (outside of some Northeast Corridor track). Amtrak is at the mercy of the railroad companies, which causes delays and other issues. Supposedly Amtrak gets preference in timing and routes, but that seldom is the case.

I didn't mean to derail this site's reporting on Louisiana building and business progress. Sorry about that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22753  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2026, 2:05 AM
sguil1 sguil1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by York1 View Post
Mostly right. Nearly $180 million dollars of federal money was used to upgrade and launch the New Orleans - Mobile train. It also uses $7 million in yearly subsidies from the federal budget. The Hiawatha route has so far received $73 million federal dollars to expand and update that route. So people from all over the U.S. are helping pay for the Hiawatha.

That wasn't my point, and I'm in favor of these trains.

The real answer isn't Amtrak in its present form. If the U.S. truly wants a train system that works, then they would have to have a major shift in the system, which is unlikely to happen.

In most European systems, the government owns the tracks and provides maintenance, while railroad companies run the trains.

In the U.S., Amtrak mostly runs on privately owned and maintained track (outside of some Northeast Corridor track). Amtrak is at the mercy of the railroad companies, which causes delays and other issues. Supposedly Amtrak gets preference in timing and routes, but that seldom is the case.

I didn't mean to derail this site's reporting on Louisiana building and business progress. Sorry about that.
Pun intended or no?

All good, this is great info thanks for sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22754  
Old Posted May 1, 2026, 3:44 PM
sguil1 sguil1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 844
Lawmakers pass incentives to bring aerospace business to Louisiana

https://neworleanscitybusiness.com/blog/2026/04/28/louisiana-aerospace-tax-breaks-space-projects/

In an effort to attract a large space flight project to Louisiana, state lawmakers are pushing through a package of bills to give special legal protections and tax breaks to aerospace companies, though details about what projects might be coming remain confidential.

The full Louisiana Legislature on Monday unanimously approved House Bills 1088 and 1179, both sponsored by Rep. Tony Bacala, R-Prairieville, to create new state tax breaks and shore up existing ones for aerospace companies. They both head to the governor’s desk. The first measure will take effect on July 1, while the second will take effect immediately after he signs it.

Both pieces of legislation were filed right before the deadline to submit bills last month and are some of the first bills to make it all the way through the legislative process during the session that started March 9.


House Bill 1088 would provide a sales tax rebate on the purchase or rental of items, equipment and materials used in aerospace facilities by companies that create at least 200 direct full-time jobs and spend at least $1 billion in capital before July 1, 2031.

Bacala’s other bill would ensure that aerospace manufacturers can claim the state’s Industrial Tax Exemption Program, which provides lucrative tax breaks on parish property taxes.

Bacala, in an interview, said aerospace manufacturers already qualified for ITEP under existing law and are reaffirmed in House Bill 1179.

There are several potential space flight projects that Louisiana is competing for, but the details are confidential. A few state officials, including legislators, are privy to more information about the potential project but have signed nondisclosure agreements and aren’t allowed to discuss them publicly.

“It’s always the way business has been done,” Bacala said. “It’s always the way it will be, and it’s probably best that way.”

Another proposal in the aerospace package, House Bill 1099, sponsored by Rep. Jack McFarland, R-Jonesboro, rapidly cleared the House Committee on Civil Law & Procedure Monday without debate or objection from any of the committee members.

The bill would protect aerospace companies from temporary restraining orders for claims of noise pollution and similar public nuisance lawsuits by creating what’s called a “special motion to strike,” which would require a plaintiff to show the court early on that they’re likely to win their lawsuit.

Joe Donahue, deputy executive counsel for Gov. Jeff Landry, attended the committee hearing in support of the bill but did not testify. He said in a later interview that a special motion to strike lets the defendant challenge the lawsuit at the earliest stage of litigation before having to file a response to the pleading.

Under current law, a special motion to strike is reserved for protecting a person’s freedom of speech by giving them a method to quickly defeat meritless defamation claims, Donahue explained. It is known in some states as an anti-SLAPP, or Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.

“It is an existing procedure for the anti-SLAPP lawsuits, and the only difference is this would be an anti-SLAPP, Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Purposes,” Donahue said, changing the last word of the acronym. “It means it’s for public projects.”

McFarland, a House leader who chairs the Appropriations Committee, told the committee he was asked to sponsor the bill in an effort to compete with neighboring states on a recent trend of aerospace industry investments across the Southeast.

“This legislation makes us more attractive, puts us in a unique position to be competitive economically, especially in light of the fact that this is not something new but something that we’ve already been participating in,” he said, referring to NASA’s Michoud facility in New Orleans.

In a later interview, McFarland said he is also restricted by a non-disclosure agreement from discussing any details about the companies or projects that are considering Louisiana as a potential investment site.

Louisiana Economic Development, the state agency that negotiates with large companies to get them to build facilities in Louisiana, is currently involved in discussions on potential aerospace projects.

“I wouldn’t go so far as to say ‘negotiations’ just yet, but there are talks happening,” LED spokeswoman Emma Watson said in a phone call Monday.

McFarland is also sponsoring a measure that would make a large swath of aerospace records confidential and exempt from the Louisiana Public Records Law.

House Bill 1071, would apply to records related to blueprints, plans, designs, technical data, operations, security, flights, and other aerospace activity if the company holds a contract with the Department of Defense or maintains information about U.S. defense weapons or capabilities.

That bill, as of Monday, had already passed the House and was pending consideration in the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee.

The aerospace legislation package is reminiscent of a law enacted in 2024 that created generous tax breaks for data center facilities. At the time, there were no publicly known data center projects under consideration in Louisiana, but months later, state officials announced Meta’s $20 billion facility in Richland Parish. Negotiations had been held in private with a small group of lawmakers and state officials as that legislation made its way through the 2024 session, according to reporting from WWNO.

Watson, the Louisiana Economic Development spokeswoman, said it would “absolutely” be accurate to compare the current aerospace legislation to the bill adopted for the Meta data center in 2024.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22755  
Old Posted May 1, 2026, 10:10 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by York1 View Post
The problem happens when people living in Louisiana are asked to pay for a train connecting Milwaukee to Chicago, or people in Wyoming are asked to pay for a train connecting New Orleans to Mobile.
Isn't that how taxes work?

I mean, if that's the logic, Amtrak should only fund the NE Corridor and we should keep all the money we generate in this corridor and reinvest it to get true high speed rail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22756  
Old Posted May 1, 2026, 11:12 PM
Chris from N.O.'s Avatar
Chris from N.O. Chris from N.O. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd&Brown View Post
Isn't that how taxes work?

I mean, if that's the logic, Amtrak should only fund the NE Corridor and we should keep all the money we generate in this corridor and reinvest it to get true high speed rail.
okay now at this point I think we really are getting past the scope of this thread
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22757  
Old Posted May 2, 2026, 3:33 AM
NOLAslimm NOLAslimm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris from N.O. View Post
okay now at this point I think we really are getting past the scope of this thread
yep, but to add, and without their own track as mentioned, they own very little track, we will never have any true high speed rail
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22758  
Old Posted May 5, 2026, 6:05 PM
sguil1 sguil1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 844
Domino Sugar Chalmette Refinery begins $785M upgrade

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22759  
Old Posted May 9, 2026, 1:42 PM
sguil1 sguil1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 844
Music museum planned for New Orleans River District inks lease with Convention Center

Organizers of the Louisiana Music & Heritage Experience, a museum intended to tell the story of the state’s musical genres, have finalized a lease with the Convention Center to locate the long-planned attraction in the heart of the River District in New Orleans.

https://www.nola.com/news/music-museum-p...41e6286ac.html#tncms-source=featured-top

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22760  
Old Posted May 9, 2026, 2:14 PM
BlueDot's Avatar
BlueDot BlueDot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by sguil1 View Post
Organizers of the Louisiana Music & Heritage Experience, a museum intended to tell the story of the state’s musical genres, have finalized a lease with the Convention Center to locate the long-planned attraction in the heart of the River District in New Orleans.

https://www.nola.com/news/music-museum-p...41e6286ac.html#tncms-source=featured-top

I love this - this will only enhance the River District.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:56 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.