HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 2:27 PM
AuxTown's Avatar
AuxTown AuxTown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,588
You had me at red brick. So appropriate for the neighbourhood and all my favourite projects the last few years have had podiums that DID NOT include grey/charcoal podia!


https://cdn.realtor.ca/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2025, 2:27 AM
ponyboycurtis's Avatar
ponyboycurtis ponyboycurtis is offline
Cigritbutt enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Blahttawa
Posts: 1,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL123 View Post
I much preferred the old Hobin design as well! I'm surprised because i usually find linebox to be a breath of fresh air in their design
The design on Sketchup?

Sketchup can take a long walk off a short pier. So effing tired off seeing those garbage can renders on a projects that will cost dozens? hundreds? of million dollars to build.
__________________
I don't understand how communism works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2026, 7:06 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,276
Agreement aims to keep artists working in Gladstone high-rise development

Capital Currents
By Matthew Garwolinski , February 5, 2026



A high-rise development appears set to proceed on Gladstone Avenue west of Preston Street, a project that will see the renovation of the historic Standard Bread Company building while maintaining a place for the artists who work there.

The building, constructed in 1924 and designated as a heritage property in 2020, is home to the Enriched Bread Artists collective of sculptors and painters that has operated a studio in the building for more than 30 years.

Some councillors were gratified that the development includes a plan for the artists, who might otherwise find it difficult to find affordable space.

“Our city is becoming more and more expensive. It’s very hard to find accessible and affordable studio space,” said Somerset Coun. Ariel Troster.

“They have been there for decades, and every year they do an open studio event. They’re some of the most talented working artists in the city, and they can do that because they are able to access affordable studio space,” she said.

Under the terms of the development agreement with the city, artists will be relocated during construction and then provided with an affordable lease longer term.

“A relocation strategy for existing artists has been submitted as a condition of site plan approval,” said Eric Forhan, one of the city planners.

“Also, confirmation of a secured affordable unit rent for the artist tenants within the Standard Bread Building for a period of 15 years.”

Troster credited the work of Kitchissippi Coun. Jeff Lieper for negotiating the agreement.

“Jeff Leiper worked really hard to negotiate the terms to maintain those protections for the artists, and I’m very supportive,” she said.

“I think we have to be very careful and think about the displacement that can happen with redevelopment,” she said. “Whether it’s an artist, grocery store worker or bus driver, we need housing for people of all income levels in our city.”

The development, led by Trinity Development Group, required city approval to increase the maximum permitted building heights.

The site, at 951 Gladstone Ave. and 145 Loretta Ave. N., will have three towers, 34, 38 and 40 storeys high with mixed-use office and retail space along with roughly 930 residential units, 496 residential parking spaces and 762 bicycle parking spaces.

The site is next to the Corso Italia O-Train station, which fits the city’s plan to encourage more density along transit corridors.

While the project was approved by the planning committee, it will need to be considered at a forthcoming city council meeting.

https://capitalcurrent.ca/agreement-aims...king-in-gladstone-high-rise-development/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2026, 9:55 PM
SL123 SL123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,915
I hope this means we are one step closer to shovels in the ground
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2026, 9:10 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,276
At Council, Applicant and City a greed to defer item to February 25.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2026, 1:08 AM
SL123 SL123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
At Council, Applicant and City a greed to defer item to February 25.
Any idea why?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2026, 5:35 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL123 View Post
Any idea why?
Nope. They approved it at Planning, and at Council they just punted it saying "both Parties want to punt it". Probably some sort of ongoing negotiation between the City and developer, or finalizing the deal with the artists. Who knows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2026, 8:45 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,424
Highrise development on Gladstone could be in jeopardy due to policy change, developer says

Mia Jensen, OBJ
March 10, 2026


A local developer is waiting on a decision from city staff that could affect its ability to go ahead with a multi-tower proposal near the Corso Italia LRT station.

CLV Group plans to build three mixed-use highrises on a one-hectare property at 951 Gladstone Ave. and 145 Loretta Ave. N., steps from Preston Street and the Little Italy neighbourhood.

The towers, ranging from 24 to 40 storeys, would contain a total of 930 residential units.

The official plan and zoning bylaw amendment application for the project is nearing the finish line, but the development has found itself in an awkward position due to a provincial policy change.

Andrew McCreight, manager of central development review for the city, told OBJ in a statement that permissions for the project were approved under section 37 of the Planning Act, which has since been replaced by the Community Benefits Charge (CBC) bylaw.

The provincial levy, which funds services and supports capital projects, applies to high-density residential developments of at least five storeys and 10 residential units.

Oz Drewniak, president of CLV Group, said that while the change will ultimately benefit developers by reducing the amounts they must pay, it creates challenges for the Gladstone proposal, which was assessed under the previous formula. “We were caught in a funny time between section 37 and the CBC,” he told OBJ last week. “We were caught in a situation where the benefits that were provided to the community were multiple times more (than revised calculations under the new policy). We’re not just talking about double. We’re talking about multiple times, tens of times more than what a developer would be paying today.” As a result, Drewniak said it may not be feasible to go ahead with the project if CLV cannot benefit from some sort of reduced levy. "If (this issue) doesn't get resolved, the development may not be able to proceed in today's environment. It may be delayed or may be completely stopped for a bit. Who knows?” said Drewniak. “We’re overburdened beyond, multiple times, what a normal developer would be. We’re just trying to get the city to work with us to get that little bit more right-sized.” According to Drewniak, the old policy calculated contributions based on the density of the project, while the CBC changed that regulation to a flat contribution rate based on four per cent of the land value.

“The city, to its credit, has been working diligently,” he said. “They do recognize that this is a unique situation and they recognize that they have to do something to make this work, because it is not equitable.” According to the application summary for the project, the 34-storey tower would be devoted to residential units, while the other two highrises would include residential units plus a five-storey podium with more than 140,000 square feet of office space and 21,000 square feet of retail space along Gladstone Avenue.

Currently located on the site is a four-storey artist studio, the Standard Bread Building, which is a designated heritage property and will be integrated into the redevelopment.

Drewniak said it’s one of the community contributions that CLV should get credit for. “We’re providing benefits in different ways and one is with the artists,” he said. “We’re totally committed to the artists and we want to continue to ensure they have a place to return to that is an affordable place, an active place, something that is a community draw.” Other contributions being made by CLV include providing monetary support to the Laurel Street pedestrian bridge, as well as affordable housing.

“In our design, in our suite mix, we’re already going to be having affordable housing options that are considered affordable under the CBC definition,” Drewniak said. “So we’re going to have affordable housing, but even beyond that, they’re asking for additional monetary contributions.” The site is currently occupied by the Gladstone Centre and two two-storey mixed-use buildings, which would be demolished to make way for the project.

Also proposed is an underground parking garage with 496 residential parking spaces and 762 spots for bicycles.

In an email statement to OBJ, McCreight said city staff are reviewing the monetary contribution related to the project and will present updated recommendations or revisions to the staff report to the housing and planning committee if needed.

“Staff are assessing the property owner’s request within the framework of the Community Benefits By-law and the existing exemption,” McCreight said in his statement.

“Under the current zoning, the site plan has been approved and the developer is actively working towards building permit issuance to start the first phase of development. The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments that were referred back to Committee do not impact the project proceeding under the approved permissions.” Drewniak said an update from the city is expected by April.

The Gladstone development was first submitted by CLV Group in 2018.

Originally spearheaded by Trinity Development Group in partnership with CLV and PBC Real Estate Advisors, the proposal initially called for highrises of 41, 35 and 30 storeys. In 2019, the proposed buildings were downsized to 35, 33 and 30 storeys. The project was then slated to include 745 residential units, before it was changed again.

CLV purchased Trinity’s share of the project in 2020 and is now the lead developer of the site.

While the company is best-known for developing and managing rental properties, it is proposing a mix of rental and condo units for the three-tower Gladstone project. CLV has been involved in a few condo projects in the past, but Drewniak said in 2021 that the Gladstone development, if approved, will likely be its biggest foray into the segment in Ottawa to date.

With files from David Sali

https://obj.ca/highrise-development-gladstone-jeopardy-policy-developer/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2026, 7:40 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,276
CLV Group’s Gladstone development to proceed after agreement reached with city over fees

By Mia Jensen, OBJ
April 10, 2026


A multi-tower development in Little Italy that was potentially going to be scuttled due to provincial bylaw changes is back on track after a decision from city council earlier this week.

Ottawa developer CLV Group is planning to build three mixed-use highrises on a one-hectare property at 951 Gladstone Ave. and 145 Loretta Ave. N., near Preston Street and the Little Italy neighbourhood.

The towers, ranging from 34 to 40 storeys, would contain a total of 930 residential units.

Earlier this year, a provincial policy change put the development at risk. Permissions for the project had been approved at the city level under section 37 of the Planning Act, which has since been replaced by the Community Benefits Charge (CBC) bylaw.

The provincial levy, which funds services and supports capital projects, applies to high-density residential developments of at least five storeys and 10 residential units.

As a result of the change, CLV raised concerns that it would be paying more in fees than it would under the new regulations. On Wednesday, city council addressed those concerns by approving a motion to reduce the development’s CBC costs.

Jenn Morrison, vice-president of planning and land development for CLV Group, told OBJ on Thursday that the developer is “relieved” by the city’s decision, adding that she hadn’t seen a situation quite like it in her 26 years in the industry.

“Most people haven’t seen this in their career,” she said. “This is probably the most unusual time we’ve worked through. But I think (the city) is recognizing that we need to work together as partners to help get these developments (built). We’re very encouraged to see the mindset shifting. For many years, it was very us versus them. But times have changed in the economic climate we have, and they’ve really stepped up.”

Oz Drewniak, president of CLV Group, told OBJ in March that the main challenge of the bylaw change was that the development’s fees were significantly higher than they could have been under new regulations.

“We were caught in a funny time between section 37 and the CBC,” he said at the time. “We were caught in a situation where the benefits that were provided to the community were multiple times more (than revised calculations under the new policy). We’re not just talking about double. We’re talking about multiple times, tens of times more than what a developer would be paying today.”

Morrison said the city’s decision allows the projects “to get in the ground.”

“Now we can start moving towards development,” she said. “We are starting demolition this month of the building and getting things moving, hopefully, for a late summer excavation. We’re still working on a few things with the city that could potentially delay things, but the city has been very helpful in trying to push departments to get the information reviewed.”

The cost reductions approved by the city total $2 million in savings for the developer. Morrison said the motion included the removal of a $1-million contribution for the affordable housing fund and another $1 million for the Laurel Street pedestrian bridge project.

She said the decision comes with the caveat that the developer must acquire a building permit within a year.

“So if we don’t go ahead with this development, we lose that benefit,” she said. “To me, that’s logical. We’re asking for help getting this off the ground. If we continue to sit on it and wait until times are better, that doesn’t really make sense. That’s why they made that caveat.”

Not all city councillors were on board with the decision.

The planning and housing committee passed the motion on April 1, with Kitchissippi Coun. Jeff Leiper and West Carleton-March Coun. Clarke Kelly dissenting. Other councillors expressed concerns but ultimately gave their approval.

Riley Brockington, councillor for River Ward, said he was concerned about what kind of precedent the decision would set.

“All developers, I think, can make a legitimate claim that it’s difficult to get projects built and I’m concerned that there will be future attempts to eliminate needed funds,” he said. “They’re still making a lot of money in this city when they develop housing.”

Somerset Coun. Ariel Troster said she was reassured by the time limit and stipulations that the fee relief wouldn’t apply unless construction went ahead. But she added that the situation was “deeply frustrating” for the communities involved.

“I understand the financial environment, I understand that we’re providing some financial incentives and some fee relief. But it is frustrating to see the clock turned back on agreements that were negotiated in good faith with the community,” she said.

According to the application summary for the project, the 34-storey tower would be devoted to residential units, while the other two highrises would include residential units plus a five-storey podium with more than 140,000 square feet of office space and 21,000 square feet of retail space along Gladstone Avenue.

Currently located on the site is a four-storey artist studio, the Standard Bread Building, which is a designated heritage property and will be integrated into the redevelopment.

The site is currently occupied by the Gladstone Centre and two two-storey mixed-use buildings, which would be demolished to make way for the project.

Also proposed is an underground parking garage with 496 residential parking spaces and 762 spots for bicycles.

The Gladstone development was first submitted by CLV Group in 2018.

Originally spearheaded by Trinity Development Group in partnership with CLV and PBC Real Estate Advisors, the proposal initially called for highrises of 41, 35 and 30 storeys. In 2019, the proposed buildings were downsized to 35, 33 and 30 storeys. The project was then slated to include 745 residential units, before it was changed again.

CLV purchased Trinity’s share of the project in 2020 and is now the lead developer of the site.

While CLV is best-known for developing and managing rental properties, it is proposing a mix of rental and condo units for the three-tower Gladstone project. CLV has been involved in a few condo projects in the past, but Drewniak said in 2021 that the Gladstone development, if approved, would likely be its biggest foray into the segment in Ottawa to date.

With files from David Sali

https://obj.ca/clv-group-gladstone-proceed-agreement-with-city-over-fees/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2026, 8:40 PM
SL123 SL123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,915
^Great News!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2026, 6:24 PM
Skipper Skipper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 105
While this is good news, hopefully this does not delay their project at Richmond Road and Churchill for too long!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2026, 3:38 PM
ponyboycurtis's Avatar
ponyboycurtis ponyboycurtis is offline
Cigritbutt enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Blahttawa
Posts: 1,576
Great news. Now lets get it rockin.
__________________
I don't understand how communism works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2026, 4:40 PM
golfguy9 golfguy9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2025
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skipper View Post
While this is good news, hopefully this does not delay their project at Richmond Road and Churchill for too long!
I stare at that "permanent" chain link fence every day on my walk to the gym. I'm not optimistic they start on this one soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted May 3, 2026, 1:39 PM
qprcanada qprcanada is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 142
Fencing for a presumed demolition has gone up at 145 Loretta Ave N.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.