HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2026, 11:57 AM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
That ballpark would be positioned with a view of The Loop from home plate, placing the right field wall adjacent with the river. The right field area would have little to no seating because of the tight dimensions of the site, potentially allowing well-hit baseballs to find a new home in the Chicago River.

This seems to indicate to me that the stadium would sit on the west side of the river, on the existing rail yard
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2026, 9:11 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,738
So much for using primarily "private" capital

Quote:
Facing the specter of losing the Chicago Bears to Indiana, the Illinois House unveiled a new version of property tax legislation that the team says is a prerequisite for building a new domed stadium in suburban Arlington Heights.
....
The legislation would also expand the tiers of projects aiming to redevelop rail yards. Potential projects that could be eligible for this incentive include the One Central development near Solider Field and Amtrak’s 14th Street rail yard in Chicago, which is being eyed by billionaire Justin Ishbia for a redevelopment that could include a future White Sox ballpark.
https://blockclubchicago.org/2026/04/22/...-new-version-of-bears-megaprojects-bill/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2026, 6:33 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,893
It's been clear for years that these sites need some kind of assistance in order to make them viable. Private capital can't fund all the necessary infrastructure for downtown levels of density. You've gotta build a street grid, utilities, replace seawalls, major structures like bridges and overpasses, etc. Or if a private project is viable, it will be along a suburban development model that is not appropriate for a near-downtown location.

Notably, Ishbia doesn't have a TIF for the Amtrak site (except a small corner at the south end is in the Pilsen TIF) and the City will tell him to pound sand if he asks for a TIF deal.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2026, 1:48 AM
Bonsai Tree's Avatar
Bonsai Tree Bonsai Tree is offline
Small but Mighty
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
They are already moving on this- pending soil testing permits were just filed for both yards north and south of Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2026, 4:25 AM
MorganChi's Avatar
MorganChi MorganChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree View Post
They are already moving on this- pending soil testing permits were just filed for both yards north and south of Roosevelt
The deal was done when the fire had the shovel dig on their stadium more than a couple weeks ago. I’m hearing we start the moving process fall of this year , what facility we be moving too? obs ( on boarding services ) the department I work will be at a temporary location in union station , conductors and other yard personal will be sharing facilities with Metra and Union Pacific
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2026, 5:36 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,206
This will never happen because we live in a very stupid world where we can't have nice things, but I love so freaking much of what these guys are calling for.

Old Comsikey was 100% pure fucking baseball magic!

It's such a damn shame that money always trumps magic these days.


Quote:
A Modest Proposal for a Better Ballpark
Three ballpark enthusiasts imagine a new White Sox stadium that brings seats closer to the action, corrects past mistakes, and democratizes the fan experience.

By Travis Sawchik
Renderings by Jack Stamm
April 28, 2026, 9:20 am


We have lost something in our experience as fans at the ballpark.

Yes, we are thankful to be beyond the multi-purpose, donut-shaped era of stadium design. Each of the 22 stadiums built since Camden Yards — which opened in 1992 and ushered in the retro era — feature different dimensions, unobstructed views, and pleasant vistas beyond the outfield seats. They have wide concourses and great amenities.

But there is one great flaw that is present in almost every ballpark of the retro era: They’ve pushed us farther away from the game.

Full article: https://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/a-modest-proposal-for-a-better-ballpark/
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2026, 10:24 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 220
^ v creative and informative article. The cantilever thing explains the hard-to-pinpoint difference between the baseball I experienced as a kid, and games at Wrigley.

I grew up going to Comerica Park-- a solid stadium, but the cheap seats have you sitting so high up and far back that you need binoculars to see the players, pretty similar to Comiskular Rate Field Park... both stadiums are so tall and open that it almost feels like you're spying down onto the field from an adjacent highrise. Meanwhile the lower deck seats are totally open to the elements, with no chance of shade, so you get absolutely annihilated by the sun.





The openness gives Comerica one of the best views in sports, but it also lets out all the noise and energy. Sox park is similar, though less flat.
Meanwhile Wrigley feels enclosed, cozy, intimate and loud as hell.





Either way, I really hope the Sox build a new stadium in the 78 and orient it northeast, just because it would instantly become the best skyline in baseball and give Sox games a unique selling point that the Cubs can't replicate.
__________________
Chi freelance designer / game dev / alley rat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2026, 11:45 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloudbod View Post
Either way, I really hope the Sox build a new stadium in the 78 and orient it northeast, just because it would instantly become the best skyline in baseball and give Sox games a unique selling point that the Cubs can't replicate.
Rebuilding new Comiskey and having it face southeast was one of the most boneheaded decisions in Chicago stadium history. Right behind tearing down the OG park. No need to move to the South Loop for views; the skylines views from the current stadium are pretty impressive ... from the north facing exit ramps.

I know the old park was is very bad shape towards the end, but retaining parts/all of the exterior would have been a worthy investment and a great way to tie in the franchise's long and storied history.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2026, 12:18 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post

I know the old park was is very bad shape towards the end, but retaining parts/all of the exterior would have been a worthy investment and a great way to tie in the franchise's long and storied history.
I was only a kid (13 when it closed), but my memories of going to games at old Comiskey do not at all jibe with the notion that it was in very bad shape.

Rough around the edges? Of course.

In need of some reno TLC? Well yeah.

But none of it had gotten to any kind of "beyond saving" level of deterioration. That was all just JR lies (and made worse by very intentional deferred maintenance on his part). He was a myopic anti-visionary who was like a decade or two behind his time. Zero imagination. He couldn't see anything other than "I want a brand new ballpark, and I want it now!!".

Stupid people do stupid things.

It sucks when they're also rich and powerful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2026, 10:35 AM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago to London
Posts: 1,104
Yeah...Wrigley Field was rough before the renovation. Really rough. It just takes the will and the $$ to do it and with Comiskey, it wasn't there. Plus, that wasn't the design trend then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2026, 3:42 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
I was only a kid (13 when it closed), but my memories of going to games at old Comiskey do not at all jibe with the notion that it was in very bad shape.

Rough around the edges? Of course.

In need of some reno TLC? Well yeah.

But none of it had gotten to any kind of "beyond saving" level of deterioration. That was all just JR lies (and made worse by very intentional deferred maintenance on his part). He was a myopic anti-visionary who was like a decade or two behind his time. Zero imagination. He couldn't see anything other than "I want a brand new ballpark, and I want it now!!".

Stupid people do stupid things.

It sucks when they're also rich and powerful.
I think we are roughly the same age (born in '77). It's subjective, of course, but I remember that before its closure, Comisky was terribly dirty and a dark dungeon in the concourses. The outside brick also lacked pretty much any refinement or graceful design to my young eye. Maybe if they hadn't painted it white, it would have retained a more historic and less dirty aesthetic. I also will never understand why they would put those ugly railings around the seat sections every five or six rows. Removing those would have been an easy fix, but I never could have figured out why they were put in the first place. Maybe after disco demolition night and crowd control efforts?

Pretty much any space can be spruced up enough if enough money is thrown in, but I'd argue the sightlines, obstructed views, and dingy corridors made the idea of renovation a fool's errand.

It would have been interesting to see the team tear down the outfield decks, though. The air circulation could have been much improved. On hot summer days, the air often felt like it was trapped and lingered, whereas Wrigley's relatively open style would allow breezes to provide a bit of cooling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2026, 5:33 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
I'd argue the sightlines, obstructed views, and dingy corridors made the idea of renovation a fool's errand.
HARD disagree.

Old Comiskey was a fucking spectacular jewel box diamond.

With a comprehensive renovation, we coulda had a southside Wrigley.



source: https://www.horschgallery.com/chicago-white-sox/old-comiskey-park-panorama


That ship obviously sailed decades ago, but I do think it'd be fantastic if some daring MLB owner would build a new stadium with a more classic jewel box upper deck.

But it probably won't happen
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2026, 8:36 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
With a comprehensive renovation, we coulda had a southside Wrigley.
Preach!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2026, 3:33 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
That ship obviously sailed decades ago, but I do think it'd be fantastic if some daring MLB owner would build a new stadium with a more classic jewel box upper deck.

But it probably won't happen
Parts of Petco or Target Field do come close to the experience of old Tiger Stadium or Polo Grounds. Here's hoping the tight railyard site in South Loop will force the Sox into similar, creative decisions.

I think the speculative design in the Chicago Mag article is a great starting point. Hopefully Ishbia is paying attention and doesn't shrug it off like Jerry did to the Armour Field plan 35 years ago.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Apr 30, 2026 at 4:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2026, 4:13 PM
Cress3803 Cress3803 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Posts: 68
the lore is Jerry rejected the HOK plan that essentially went on to be used for Jacobs Field in Cleveland

he'd probably be trying to get out of that by now anyway
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.