Posted Jan 22, 2026, 7:24 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,078
|
|
Also, this is a good article when read in the context of the news above. It's not specifically about Portland, but does mention some of the author's work here (including related to a proposed Sneaker Museum--something I've heard mentioned a few times, but don't yet know much about).
Quote:
Yes, Downtowns must reinvent themselves — as visitor destinations

Yes, Downtowns do need to reinvent themselves in the post-pandemic era — but not only, or even primarily, as residential neighborhoods. They must also create new reasons to visit, for people who do not already live or work there. After all, it is such “destination-driven” traffic — whether from other city neighborhoods, from farther-flung suburbs or from beyond the region — which has always fueled consumer spending in so many of our Downtowns, and which remains today an essential ingredient to sustaining their sizeable retail footprints.
This might require stakeholders to take some “big swings” — high-risk/high-reward efforts to develop large-scale attractions that can raise a Downtown’s profile, extend its reach and drive higher footfall.
I realize that such forays have an uneven history, in many cases promising far more than they ultimately delivered. If you build it, they do not necessarily come. I have also long argued that at least with retail-focused projects, trying to realize long-term (or, as I call them, “end-state”) aspirations in one fell swoop often backfire.
I would like to think, though, that we have learned a thing or two from the mistakes of the past. With this in mind, I have been proposing an approach which does not put all of the proverbial eggs in one basket but rather, like a diversified investment portfolio, couples the long plays on potential game-changers with more practical initiatives designated to yield near-term results. We can work and chew gum at the same time.
|
...continues here.
|