Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj
I'm dubious until there's shovels in the ground, but everyone I know who golfs is resolute that the city could sustain another course. Gotta wonder about landfill proximity causing unpleasant aromas.
In this area, it would be great to see twinning as far as the Colonel Nase exit and a reconfiguration of the 7/177/Crane Mountain interchange, especially if some of Acamac Backland is going to get upgraded. I don't think there's a place in the province where 'RIGHT LANE ENDS' means so little to so many, as Route 7 northbound, and beyond Colonel Nase, there's not really a need for full twinning. This section does get congested more than people would realize.
You'd only need two new overpasses (over Route 177 and Henderson Lake Road) and the land is all DTI property. Less than three miles total. Make the northern terminus right-lane-exit onto Colonel Nase.
I can't see this being excessively expensive.
|
Bringing this up from a couple pages back as I'm here for the first time in years, but -
Living in Westfield, I've never understood why they didn't do the same thing with the existing Grand Bay interchange and simply have the right lane exit. The narrowing just before an exit causes all kinds of traffic headaches as nervous or incompetent drivers slow down in the only through-traffic lane well in advance of the off ramp.
Personally I'd love to see the twinning of the highway carried all the way through to the Welsford bypass, so we'd have a contiguous four-lane highway from Route 1 to the other side of Welsford where there is a much better engineered transition to two lanes. That would be more than sufficient, as there is really no need for Route 7 to be fully twinned. At most it could maybe do with another passing lane here and there, but it already has quite a few.