Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme
The next paragraph in the story - touching on affordability - is far more relevant to the discussion about Vancouver's future, but that's not what was highlighted. Does anyone really believe that people will turn away from this city in droves if the natural aspects (sea, mountains, nature) are still there, just harder to see for a select few?
|
Yes, that's why I said the article could fit in many threads. He's not wrong though when he said Vancouver without the views is just another mid-tier city in the Americas.
Threaded Mode