Housing costs are dramatically lower than Seattle, SD, LA, or SF.
Some questions: While Oregon is great at reducing sprawl, does it do enough to encourage infill? Are enough places zoned for 6-8-story woodframes to make land costs reasonable on a per-new-unit basis? Are cities required to accept growth? Are fees out of hand? Can NIMBYs stop projects?
PS, isn't the entire forum about real estate? If this thread is about residential real estate it would help to call it that.
__________________
"Alot" has never been a word.
|
Threaded Mode