Posted Dec 24, 2024, 4:57 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,674
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
Class 8 doesn't just cover recreational property. It also includes land used by non-profit organizations. All places of worship, and meeting halls owned by fraternal organizations fall within Class 8, and pay taxes based on the Class 8 tax rate.
If there were two separate classes, it might allow the City to have a higher tax rate on the recreational properties, although I think there are also some privately owned recreational properties that pay taxes based on Class 8, and a higher tax rate would be an issue for those too.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou
Unless you can give me a compelling argument for all the class 8 land that we need to protect with tax incentives, you're out of luck here kid. Where are all the class 8 sites we want to give tax breaks to? Don't tell me you think the parks board pays property tax to the city.
|
I have to assume that your compelling argument is that you want to give tax breaks to churches and the freemasons. Great argument.
|