HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2024, 9:22 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Yes and no - Germany put all their money on solar and onshore wind in the 2010s, and they ended up with brownouts (and subsequent increased dependency on coal and gas). They're decent for peak load, but we'll need more baseload generation too; Site E, offshore wind, run-of-river dams and SMRs seem to be the way forward.
The nice thing about hydroelectric dams is that water can be banked up like a battery and released on demand to match electricity needs. The great thing about solar and onshore wind is that at least sometimes they increase the electricity supply meaning the dams can reduce generation and hold back water during those times. Then when solar and onshore wind aren't generating as much, we can pass more water through the dam than we otherwise would have. Solar and onshore wind actually do increase our baseload capacity because of this, specifically due to our hydroelectricity dominant system.

Hooray for hydroelectricity!
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:23 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.