HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5901  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2023, 10:47 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave2 View Post
Flyover ramps!
Basket weaves!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5902  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2023, 1:13 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 885
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5903  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2023, 2:21 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
From the article:
Quote:
As part of the Township of Langley’s Transportation Master Plan, the road upgrades which began in October 2022, include two additional lanes, curb and gutter improvements, streetlights and multi-use pathways.

The multi-use pathways are separated from regular road traffic because they are geared for other modes of transportation such as cycling or walking.
We're going to see a lot more road upgrades that include nearby multi-use pathways. Since 2020 I've been seeing a lot more micro mobility and it's about time something was done to make space for them and everyone else who isn't a car driver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5904  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2023, 2:37 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
Yikes those building block retaining walls are ugly. That’s why I asked if they were temporary in another thread involving the steveston highway interchange in Richmond. These unfortunately seem to be permanent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5905  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2023, 11:01 PM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 885
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5906  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 12:05 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,582
"Fraser Valley chambers push for highway widening as far as Chilliwack"

There's this thing known as a headline... Also the Fraser Valley isn't part of Metro Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5907  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 12:17 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
Question how wide

If Highway One were expanded and widened to Chilliwack, how many lanes wide would it be? Six? 3 in each direction? Any express lanes? Other features?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5908  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2023, 3:07 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,393
Good that they are pushing for widening, as traffic today already warrants 3+3 lanes all the way to Chilliwack, not to mention with the planned 47% growth in population. Our region is going to be so screwed in terms of mobility no matter where you live.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5909  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2023, 1:46 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Good that they are pushing for widening, as traffic today already warrants 3+3 lanes all the way to Chilliwack, not to mention with the planned 47% growth in population. Our region is going to be so screwed in terms of mobility no matter where you live.
You are probably right, but is there a remedy? More expressways? Widening of existing roads/upgrading to expressway status? More rail transit? What do you suggest?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5910  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2023, 6:22 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 885
https://www.pittmeadows.ca/our-community...YL3QbK75HwvvfsmyqcGTI8OggtJT9yHd8AoM8sGo

Once again these governments all they do is waste our money. Plus they're all talk about so called climate change . Why waste money destroying 2 perfectly good round abouts and installing more expensive, arguably more maintenance heavy lighted intersection. Plus of course now you're gonna have cars sitting there waiting for 1 car or no car to go thru. It boggles the mind how we can sit there and let them waste money like that .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5911  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2023, 4:39 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
https://www.pittmeadows.ca/our-community...YL3QbK75HwvvfsmyqcGTI8OggtJT9yHd8AoM8sGo

Once again these governments all they do is waste our money. Plus they're all talk about so called climate change . Why waste money destroying 2 perfectly good round abouts and installing more expensive, arguably more maintenance heavy lighted intersection. Plus of course now you're gonna have cars sitting there waiting for 1 car or no car to go thru. It boggles the mind how we can sit there and let them waste money like that .
I understand your concerns about waste, but in this case is it really applicable? The changes you've linked to appear to include more than just the removal of two roundabouts, as the municipality appears to be significantly upgrading Airport Way between the Golden Ears Connector and the airport. From the press release:
  • Fully signalized intersections at Airport Way/Bonson Road and Airport Way/Harris Road with pedestrian crossings and curb letdowns for accessibility;
  • Widening of Airport Way between Baynes Road and Southgate Rd to two lanes in each direction;
  • Widening of Fraser Way and Lasser Road;
  • Addition of sidewalks and crosswalks along the Harris Road corridor;
  • Development of many multi-use path connections to enhance walkability, accessibility and create more active transportation opportunities;
  • Addition of berms along Fraser Way, Lasser Road and south of Fieldstone Walk to provide sound and visual buffers.

It also seems to relate to the Golden Ears Business Park: https://www.pittmeadows.ca/homes-development/property-development/golden-ears-business-park-gebp
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5912  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2023, 8:52 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
https://www.pittmeadows.ca/our-community...YL3QbK75HwvvfsmyqcGTI8OggtJT9yHd8AoM8sGo

Once again these governments all they do is waste our money. Plus they're all talk about so called climate change . Why waste money destroying 2 perfectly good round abouts and installing more expensive, arguably more maintenance heavy lighted intersection. Plus of course now you're gonna have cars sitting there waiting for 1 car or no car to go thru. It boggles the mind how we can sit there and let them waste money like that .

So called? What are you, five?
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5913  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2023, 12:17 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
So called? What are you, five?
I think the deniers tend toward the older end of the spectrum. Most of the young'uns get it 'cause they're the ones who will have to live with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5914  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2023, 7:57 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 885
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5915  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2023, 6:06 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
https://www.pittmeadows.ca/our-community...YL3QbK75HwvvfsmyqcGTI8OggtJT9yHd8AoM8sGo

Once again these governments all they do is waste our money. Plus they're all talk about so called climate change . Why waste money destroying 2 perfectly good round abouts and installing more expensive, arguably more maintenance heavy lighted intersection. Plus of course now you're gonna have cars sitting there waiting for 1 car or no car to go thru. It boggles the mind how we can sit there and let them waste money like that .
🤦♂️🤦♂️ gtfoh
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5916  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2023, 8:50 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,031
If the concern is traffic flow or pedestrian safety, shouldn't the answer be bigger roundabouts? Four-way traffic lights are worse in both regards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5917  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2023, 9:35 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
If the concern is traffic flow or pedestrian safety, shouldn't the answer be bigger roundabouts? Four-way traffic lights are worse in both regards.
If the pedestrians are trying to cross the road, roundabouts can be worse (unless the context is a slow, traffic calmed residential street). The research seems to suggest they're safer overall for drivers (because they have to slow down).

Drivers are concentrating on merging, and then on accelerating away from the roundabout once they reach their exit. They don't see pedestrians or cyclists, and even with marked crosswalks on the edges of the roundabout, they sometimes don't stop. If they do stop unexpectedly if they see a pedestrian on the crossing, it's quite likely they can get rear ended as the car behind isn't anticipating them stopping. If the crosswalk is moved away from the roundabout it becomes very inconvenient for pedestrians, who then tend to short-cut rather than diverting to the crosswalk.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Changing City; Aug 12, 2023 at 10:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5918  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2023, 3:29 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,527
All I can say is transportation through the Abbotsford-Hope corridor is a circus and completely inadequate.

I'd love to see a train or something, but in the mean time, more lanes are required. Or even an alternate parallel route, but that's not really feasible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5919  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2023, 11:35 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
If the pedestrians are trying to cross the road, roundabouts can be worse (unless the context is a slow, traffic calmed residential street).
According ICBC's "Learn to Drive Smart" guide, the circular concrete planters used in residential neighborhoods, typically where you'd often see a 4-way stop, are "Traffic Circles", while the larger lane-controlled circular intersections are "Roundabouts".

It's important to distinguish between the two, because the rules are different. When there's a traffic conflict, you have to yield to the person on the right in a traffic circle (just like at an uncontrolled intersection), while in a roundabout you have to yield to the person on your left (i.e., "traffic already in the circle")
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5920  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2023, 12:23 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
According ICBC's "Learn to Drive Smart" guide, the circular concrete planters used in residential neighborhoods, typically where you'd often see a 4-way stop, are "Traffic Circles", while the larger lane-controlled circular intersections are "Roundabouts".

It's important to distinguish between the two, because the rules are different. When there's a traffic conflict, you have to yield to the person on the right in a traffic circle (just like at an uncontrolled intersection), while in a roundabout you have to yield to the person on your left (i.e., "traffic already in the circle")
That's not quite how the rules are interpreted in the City of Vancouver (or how I was taught to drive). You have to yield to someone already on the traffic circle, just as on a roundabout. (Maybe that's why a lot of drivers seem not to know how to drive round traffic circles?)

"There are three rules to remember when navigating a traffic circle:

1. Keep to the right and travel through the intersection in a counter clockwise direction around the island.
2. Give right-of-way to any vehicle already in the intersection.
3. If you enter a traffic circle at the same time as another driver, the vehicle to the right has right-of-way.
"

Actually - that's what the ICBC Guide says too. "Yield to any traffic in the traffic circle. If another vehicle arrives at the traffic circle at the same time as you do, yield to the vehicle on your right".

My point was rather that pedestrians should be safer crossing residential streets where there are traffic circles - traffic should be moving slowly, and the distances to cross are normal street width and the route to cross pretty much follows the street itself. It's very different at roundabouts on major roads where traffic may be trying to 'flow' and not concentrating on pedestrians who may be trying to cross. Even some traffic circles have been removed when they don't work as intended.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.