Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse
Yes it's quite consistent that denser urban areas generate more tax revenue relative to the spending required to support them and therefore subsidize their low density surroundings. But I'm sure suburban areas still "feel" deprived since very costly things such as requiring far more road surface per resident are kind of invisible to people while lower cost things like cycle infrastructure are conspicuous due to being different.
|
It's crazy that on an urbanism forum this has to be explained.
Threaded Mode