HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1821  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2023, 5:59 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Updated Active Transportation Project List and Network Maps now posted

Crosstown Bikeways Network
Active Transportation Major Structures
Rural Active Transportation Networks
Links are broken. Try posting original links, not the ones that were replaced with cached versions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1822  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2023, 6:09 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post
Links are broken. Try posting original links, not the ones that were replaced with cached versions.
Fixed:

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Updated Active Transportation Project List and Network Maps now posted

Main Link - https://engage.ottawa.ca/transportat...aps-now-posted

Crosstown Bikeways Network - https://engage.ottawa.ca/11511/widge...cuments/100586
Active Transportation Major Structures - https://engage.ottawa.ca/11511/widge...cuments/100584
Rural Active Transportation Networks - https://engage.ottawa.ca/11511/widge...cuments/100588

Last edited by rocketphish; Mar 15, 2023 at 12:49 AM. Reason: Fixed broken links
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1823  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2023, 1:15 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,496
Ottawa aims to close cycling 'missing links' in new transportation plan
Cycling routes to grow by 50 per cent by 2046 under proposed plan

Laura Glowacki · CBC News
Posted: Apr 17, 2023 10:47 PM EDT | Last Updated: 3 hours ago




Ottawa's transportation committee approved the first part of the city's new transportation master plan on Monday, laying out a vision that aims to see fewer people relying on cars to get around the city over the coming decades.

"This is just going to set the path for the next 25 years — that we want safer cycling. We want safer walking," transportation committee chair Coun. Tim Tierney said.

"Overall I was very happy with the outcome today."

According to the staff report, Ottawa's transportation master plan is the blueprint for planning, developing and operating the city's walking, cycling, transit and car networks until 2046.

The plan had to be divided into two parts, because COVID-19 had such a profound effect on travel patterns it delayed city staff's ability to collect the necessary data, program manager with the city Jennifer Armstrong told the committee Monday.

As a result, Monday's plan only covers transportation policies, frameworks to decide how to prioritize future projects and a priority list of active transportation projects.

Ten of the transportation committee's 12 members voted in favour of the first part of the plan. The two dissenters both represent wards in Ottawa's east end — Orléans East-Cumberland Coun. Matthew Luloff and Orléans South-Navan Coun. Catherine Kitts.

The opposing councillors raised concerns about a lack of sidewalks and cycling routes in east Ottawa, and underlined how fast their communities are growing.

"I often talk about the lack of transit, the lack of cycling, the lack of walkability in Orléans South-Navan, and I was really hoping that the TMP [transportation master plan] would be an opportunity to correct some of that," Kitts said. "Unfortunately, I wasn't seeing it reflected in the document."

During the committee meeting, Luloff said suburban Ottawans will chose to take their car if no other alternative is available to them.

Kitts said she's optimistic she will be able to support the plan once it reaches council later this month.

She said she would like assurances from staff that the major infrastructure projects she wants to come to fruition in Orléans, such as bus rapid transit, will be included in the second part of the plan due in 2025.

According to Tierney, who served as a councillor when the last transportation master plan was approved in 2013, the biggest departure in the new version is a greater emphasis on active transportation and safer streets.

The document is also designed, he said, to be re-examined every five years to ensure it takes into account future new technologies and city needs.

Much has changed since the 2013 plan, including the addition of e-scooters, ride hailing apps and the introduction of the new official plan last year. The official plan sets the goal of ensuring the majority of trips made in Ottawa will be done using low-carbon modes of transportation, such as walking, transit, carpooling or cycling.

The city plans to increase cycling routes by 50 per cent by 2046, which will add dozens of routes across the city.

The focus will be on addressing "critical missing links," the plan said, which means adding or upgrading roads, sidewalks and paths to ensure cyclists aren't left stranded trying to connect between routes.

Some of the missing links set to be bridged include a stretch south of Fitzgerald Road, Main Street southbound, Crestway Drive and sections of Campeau Drive and Kanata Avenue.

Among the dozens of new bike routes proposed, staff want to create an expanded cross-town bikeway network and a paved shoulder network to connect small communities like North Gower, Richmond, Kars and Manotick.

City council is set to vote on the first part of the new transportation master plan at its meeting scheduled April 26.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...plan-1.6813592
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1824  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2023, 3:48 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,094
The rural map stresses to me the need to expropriate the living crap out of Constance Bay beach.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1825  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2023, 3:55 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,094
Where is that 2023 green map from the CBC article to be found in the wild?
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1826  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2023, 7:10 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Where is that 2023 green map from the CBC article to be found in the wild?
Looks like this (though it's a different colour):
https://pub-ottawa.escribemeetings.c...umentId=117412

from: https://pub-ottawa.escribemeetings.c...ab=attachments
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1827  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2023, 2:43 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,496
Got a bike lane or sidewalk you dream about? Committee endorses list of planned active transportation projects
If approved by council, the projects would take more than two decades to implement at existing funding levels, with an estimated price tag of $350 million

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Citizen
Published Apr 18, 2023 • Last updated 5 hours ago • 5 minute read


From new sidewalks to additional bike lanes, a list of nearly 250 projects that could bulk up Ottawa’s active transportation network has been endorsed by a city hall committee.

If approved by council, the projects would take more than two decades to implement at existing funding levels, with an estimated price tag of $350 million. Staff aren’t asking for any more money at this point, but say they’ll be looking for additional funding to speed up the progress through the list, including from other levels of government.

It’s just one element of a massive strategic undertaking at city hall called the transportation master plan (TMP), which is being updated in two parts from the version approved back in 2013.

Over the past decade, the city has seen massive changes to the ways residents move around – from the introduction of light rail, then the shift to working from home amid the pandemic – as well as a new policy focus at city hall on climate change and active transportation. The city’s development-focused official plan, which the TMP supports, is now aiming for half of all trips by 2046 to be made by walking, cycling, transit or via carpool, bundled together as “sustainable” transportation modes.

“I think it’s hard to say whether or not we’ll reach that, but I think the policies that in front of us set us certainly in the right direction,” Stittsville Coun. Glen Gower remarked at transportation committee Monday. “And if we want it to happen faster, then it’s up to us to fund it.”

The active transportation projects on the committee-backed list are misfits, of sorts, that aren’t planned for delivery through other mechanisms, like larger road-building or resurfacing projects. On the biking side, those other delivery avenues account for the bulk of the city’s planned cycling facilities through to 2046, adding 420 kilometres on top of the 1,080 kms that exist today. This list of standalone active transportation projects would add another 130 kms, mostly through small-scale projects with budgets between $500,000 and $3 million.

They came together through public engagement on “missing links” in the active transportation network – more than 1,000 residents dropped virtual pins on a map to indicate these – as well as through councillor input on highest-priority projects in their wards, and a city-wide review with consultants of walking and cycling networks. Connectivity to key destinations was a guiding factor as staff compiled the list, published in final form five weeks ago, but they also considered the potential to improve safety and comfort from what exists today, the availability of alternative routes, and project cost.

A draft project list was shared with the public for a final consultation round in late 2021 and early 2022, generating roughly 3,500 individual responses to a survey. The most participation came from postal codes K2H (Nepean neighbourhoods west of Greenbank Road, including Bells Corners and Crystal Bay), K2S (Stittsville) and K1S (the Glebe/Old Ottawa South and East).

Asked to indicate the proposed projects most important to them, the top choices on the pedestrian side were a pathway along Slidell Street (at Bayview Yards) from the Ottawa River Pathway to Bayview Station, and a pedestrian crossing on the Queen Elizabeth Driveway at Argyle Avenue. On the cycling side, the big winner was a separated cycling facilities project along Wellington Street from Sussex Drive to the Portage Bridge, followed by improvements along Moodie Drive in Bells Corners. All remained on the list presented to committee Monday.

Many of the 244 projects that made the cut are ready to move to planning and design, but roughly 50 are just feasibility studies described by staff as having “a high degree of risk or unknown.” Funding and implementation are by no means guaranteed, but this category of project “will assess solutions to important but challenging missing links,” staff wrote in their report to the committee. The most popular of these, for the 2022 survey participants, was a study of adding cycling facilities on Gladstone Avenue from the O-Train Pathway to Percy Street.

Some councillors were pleased with what’s in the long-term works for their respective constituencies. Knoxdale-Merivale’s Sean Devine said the listed projects are “word-for-word what I’m hearing from residents today,” about needed improvements in his ward.

But others saw gaps. Matthew Luloff (Orléans East – Cumberland) and Catherine Kitts (Orléans South-Navan) reported just six and five of the 244 listed projects in their own wards, respectively. Both dissented during the final committee vote on the TMP.

“You’re not going to see the kind of walking activity that you see anywhere else if we don’t provide the facilities for them to walk,” said Luloff. “You’re not going to see that kind of demand for active transportation in an area where infrastructure doesn’t exist.”

An update to the TMP, once finalized, is expected within 10 years. That will present a formal opportunity to add new active transportation projects to the list that council will be asked to sign off on, later this month, but won’t be the only chance for councillors or staff to do so.

“It’s dynamic. It’s a living document,” director of transportation planning Vivi Chi told reporters after the committee meeting. “This is kind of the framework that we’re working around. And if something flares up that we hadn’t seen or something comes up that’s really, really needed, of course, we will be flexible and react to that and add it.”

The city’s GeoOttawa tool offers an interactive map, for those equipped to navigate its layers, showing the 244 projects on the TMP list. It also has a layer showing “in-process active transportation facilities,” which are projects in the planning phase that are expected to be delivered through other city programs by 2031.

As for when the projects on the TMP list actually roll out, staff explained that they’ll bring forward those for implementation in 2024 and 2025 through the annual budget process.

A five-year project list will then come forward with the second half of the Transportation Master Plan – a process that will include a review of the entire capital budget for transportation. Zlatko Krstulic, program manager of active transportation planning, described it as an opportunity “to consider how much of that bigger pie should be spent on our active transportation.”

The second phase of the TMP work, scheduled for completion in 2025, will involve looking at the projects and investments needed to hit the city’s own targets for greenhouse gas reductions, and for seeing half of all trips involve sustainable modes of transportation with 25 years.

The projects list and the remainder of the Phase 1 TMP work will proceed to city council for a final vote on April 26.

The latest draft of the list is available here, though some ward numbers associated with projects will be corrected before arriving at council.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...ation-projects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1828  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2023, 4:06 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is online now
Unapologetic Occidental
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 68,271
Kudos to Gatineau for getting the sweepers out earlier than usual this year on the paved cycling lanes of major boulevards.

I started biking a few weeks ago and at least in my areas the roadsides had already been swept.
__________________
The Last Word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1829  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2023, 5:18 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 1,768
Meanwhile NCC still insisting it's winter and won't clear the ice storm debris for who knows how long

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1830  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 1:12 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 1,768


This is do dumb.
They could've just dedicated one lane on one side for a bi-directional bike lane that e-scooters could use too, separating it with curbs or flexiposts. This would preserve a full lane on another side for tour buses, parking, unloading and whatnot, making everyone happy.
Instead, they painted bike lanes on both sides taking away two full lanes while keeping it dangerous for bikes and confusing for drivers and tour buses. Yes, tour buses are expected to park in the bike lane, while bikes are required to take the car lane to pass them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1831  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 1:26 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post

This is do dumb.
They could've just dedicated one lane on one side for a bi-directional bike lane that e-scooters could use too, separating it with curbs or flexiposts. This would preserve a full lane on another side for tour buses, parking, unloading and whatnot, making everyone happy.
Instead, they painted bike lanes on both sides taking away two full lanes while keeping it dangerous for bikes and confusing for drivers and tour buses. Yes, tour buses are expected to park in the bike lane, while bikes are required to take the car lane to pass them.
Surely this can't be true that tour busses will park in the bike lane? I can't imagine that will last.

Totally agree this is an ideal spot for a single bike path going in both directions next to Parliament with the bonus of no real streets to cross.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1832  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 1:43 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,259
Quite a ridiculous layout. The bike lanes on Rideau are bi-directional on the north side. No reason why they couldn't connect to those. There are plenty of parking lots on the Hill where tour buses can move.

This is an epic failure on the City's part. The Feds gave them an opportunity for discussions and a better stop-gap solution, but the City refuses to negotiate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1833  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 2:55 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 1,957
Can we PLEASE start firing people at the City who are not up to doing a proper job, and/or are actively doing what they can to delay (or even sabotage) Council's wishes?

Wellington has five (5!) lanes of width. There are MUCH better layouts that could have been designed, but the goal of staff seems to be to close off Wellington.

Council claims that Wellington is a critical piece of the transportation network. It was, prior to the occupation, carrying two lanes of traffic in each direction, with central turn lanes. Outside of peak periods, tour buses could stop (not park) in the north lane so that tourists could have a view of the Parliament Buildings, with a fast description. (This would sometimes lead to tourists returning on their own for a tour inside the buildings.) West-bound traffic could still get around the stopped buses in the other lane.

Wellington was a main component of the downtown road network. It provided a direct (without many turns to parallel streets) connection between the east and the west and north. The connection with the Sir JAM Parkway and the Portage Bridge was designed with Wellington being the corridor through downtown. This was included in the NCC’s Confederation Boulevard concept, which joined several main attractions on one loop.

Sure, people can weave through the core to get around Wellington, but that inconvenience was wasteful (of fuel and time), and added danger (since more collisions happen at intersections than along straight roads).

When the roadway was TEMPORARILY closed, City staff took it upon themselves to remove the traffic signals. When directed by Council to open the road up again, they have dragged their feet. Now, they have taken it upon themselves to redesign the roadway so that it provides the worst experience for everyone, and cuts the capacity of the road significantly. There appears to be no thought towards enabling the functionality that had been there.

To me, this looks as if staff is deliberately trying to make Wellington fail as a transportation corridor, so that it can be closed and transferred to the Feds. Yup, that is a harsh opinion, but I am struggling to find any other reasoning for how staff have acted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1834  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 3:11 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
To me, this looks as if staff is deliberately trying to make Wellington fail as a transportation corridor, so that it can be closed and transferred to the Feds. Yup, that is a harsh opinion, but I am struggling to find any other reasoning for how staff have acted.
Don't think so. They are just a disinterested bunch, taking no pride in their job and counting days to their pension. I bet they haven't even visited the street once, applying the same principles across the board that they were taught back in the 80s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1835  
Old Posted May 1, 2023, 9:05 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post
Not to mention connect to the bi-directional bike lanes to the west into Portage Bridge. If the NCC wanted to make "Confederation Boulevard" work better for cyclists, the inner side of the ring route should have bi-directional bike tracks
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Didn't even think about that. Gatineau also needs to get its act together and build bike lanes along Laurier instead of forcing everyone down to the NCC's Voyageur Pathway.
While we're waiting for the tram loop, this seems like an easy project.

It seems Gatineau often scores high on cycling, but I don't understand why. Seems much of the cycling routes are NCC and the City itself hasn't done that much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1836  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 11:41 AM
acottawa acottawa is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
Can we PLEASE start firing people at the City who are not up to doing a proper job, and/or are actively doing what they can to delay (or even sabotage) Council's wishes?

Wellington has five (5!) lanes of width. There are MUCH better layouts that could have been designed, but the goal of staff seems to be to close off Wellington.

Council claims that Wellington is a critical piece of the transportation network. It was, prior to the occupation, carrying two lanes of traffic in each direction, with central turn lanes. Outside of peak periods, tour buses could stop (not park) in the north lane so that tourists could have a view of the Parliament Buildings, with a fast description. (This would sometimes lead to tourists returning on their own for a tour inside the buildings.) West-bound traffic could still get around the stopped buses in the other lane.

Wellington was a main component of the downtown road network. It provided a direct (without many turns to parallel streets) connection between the east and the west and north. The connection with the Sir JAM Parkway and the Portage Bridge was designed with Wellington being the corridor through downtown. This was included in the NCC’s Confederation Boulevard concept, which joined several main attractions on one loop.

Sure, people can weave through the core to get around Wellington, but that inconvenience was wasteful (of fuel and time), and added danger (since more collisions happen at intersections than along straight roads).

When the roadway was TEMPORARILY closed, City staff took it upon themselves to remove the traffic signals. When directed by Council to open the road up again, they have dragged their feet. Now, they have taken it upon themselves to redesign the roadway so that it provides the worst experience for everyone, and cuts the capacity of the road significantly. There appears to be no thought towards enabling the functionality that had been there.

To me, this looks as if staff is deliberately trying to make Wellington fail as a transportation corridor, so that it can be closed and transferred to the Feds. Yup, that is a harsh opinion, but I am struggling to find any other reasoning for how staff have acted.
I think this was dictated by council. From the citizen on Jan 26

The motion that ultimately passed Thursday includes language directing staff to explore options for temporary Wellington Street closures this summer for special events or for residents’ wellbeing and to include a temporary protected bike lane with flex posts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1837  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 1:56 PM
OTownandDown OTownandDown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,366
Meanwhile there are lots of super-wide, under used roads ON parliament campus (I'm looking at you, Vittoria Street) where buses could line up all day long.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1838  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 2:05 PM
LRTeverywhere LRTeverywhere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 231
From my understanding, city staff would be very hesitant to create a bi-directional cycleway with only flex posts separating from the street, so given a probably pretty tight budget for materials they likely couldn't make it work.

Not to say I am at all happy with the work they did and the "compromises" that the lanes have are pretty unacceptable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1839  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 4:42 PM
OTownandDown OTownandDown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,366
Surely this photo is just an 'exit' for bicycles turning left on O'Connor or Bank? I can't see a bus parking in a 20ft long area of missing flexiposts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post


This is do dumb.
They could've just dedicated one lane on one side for a bi-directional bike lane that e-scooters could use too, separating it with curbs or flexiposts. This would preserve a full lane on another side for tour buses, parking, unloading and whatnot, making everyone happy.
Instead, they painted bike lanes on both sides taking away two full lanes while keeping it dangerous for bikes and confusing for drivers and tour buses. Yes, tour buses are expected to park in the bike lane, while bikes are required to take the car lane to pass them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1840  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 4:50 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown View Post
Surely this photo is just an 'exit' for bicycles turning left on O'Connor or Bank? I can't see a bus parking in a 20ft long area of missing flexiposts.
I think that break is for bikes to switch lanes for a left turn.
This is the break for idling buses:

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.