HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 4:50 PM
megadude megadude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: N. York/Bram/Mark/Sauga/Burl/Oak/DT
Posts: 3,111
By the way, would you say this condo complex in Barrie, ON is representative of AB and BC style and colour?

https://www.google.com/maps/@44.3548...7i13312!8i6656
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 5:20 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 23,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by megadude View Post
By the way, would you say this condo complex in Barrie, ON is representative of AB and BC style and colour?

https://www.google.com/maps/@44.3548...7i13312!8i6656
Maybe for higher end multifamily. Unfortunately most housing is greige vinyl or stucco with some wood shingles on the front that fade and never get re-stained. Calgary's inner city condos have really stepped up their game of late, but the suburban stuff is mostly still shit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 5:30 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 23,699
I wonder would many of the 'historic' homes we see today have been considered ugly back when they were built? Most are bastardized versions of classical architecture. Or is it modern renovations that make them look worse? Here are a couple examples from Medicine Hat that clearly look like ripoffs of Victorian homes from the early 20th century:

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.0400...7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.0385...7i13312!8i6656
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 5:34 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 23,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
I wonder would many of the 'historic' homes we see today have been considered ugly back when they were built? Most are bastardized versions of classical architecture. Or is it modern renovations that make them look worse? Here are a couple examples from Medicine Hat that clearly look like ripoffs of Victorian homes from the early 20th century:

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.0400...7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.0385...7i13312!8i6656
Most would have appealed to the tastes of the time, one assumes, or they would not have been built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 5:36 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 23,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Most would have appealed to the tastes of the time, one assumes, or they would not have been built.
Well most suburban architecture today appeals to 'the tastes of the time' so does that make it not ugly? I mean would architects or people from actual Victorian era cities have viewed it as a clumsy imitation?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 5:41 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 23,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Well most suburban architecture today appeals to 'the tastes of the time' so does that make it not ugly? I mean would architects or people from actual Victorian era cities have viewed it as a clumsy imitation?
No idea, but I assume that only a small minority of people purchase homes that they consider to be "ugly". I know I wouldn't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.