HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 7:11 PM
Investing In Chicago Investing In Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post

I'm not here to say Chicago is not cold - because it is. But I also find the coldness overplayed because people will make others believe that it's always in the negatives when it's not or that Chicago gets a ton of snow but it only gets a moderate amount of snow (Boston for example gets more snow than Chicago). Statistically, you have about a 5% chance based on the last handful of years that temperatures will ever reach in the negatives and maybe a 30% or 35% chance total that either temperatures will be in the negatives or that wind chills will be in the negatives at any point in the day (even if just for 30 minutes).
I'm not sure who you are hanging out with, but does anyone actually believe "Chicago is always in the negatives"? That is just plain stupid.

I"m not sure if the cold is exaggerated or not, but from in my opinion Chicago probably has the 2nd worst winters in the US, after Minneapolis. For me I can handle the snow, but the cold, no thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2002  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 8:05 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Investing In Chicago View Post
I'm not sure who you are hanging out with, but does anyone actually believe "Chicago is always in the negatives"? That is just plain stupid.

I"m not sure if the cold is exaggerated or not, but from in my opinion Chicago probably has the 2nd worst winters in the US, after Minneapolis. For me I can handle the snow, but the cold, no thanks.
Who I was hanging out with? Everyone I worked with acted like this, numerous of my neighbors. people I didnt know who would randomly strike up conversations in public complaining, etc. Chicago is cold, but people act like theres literally nowhere worse in terms of populated places in the lower 48. It's so sad its laughable. If you get multiple days over the last handful of winters in the 50s, it's not even close to the worst. Sorry.

That is also your opinion about who has "worse winters." I've lived in multiple places of the midwest and Chicago is definitely not 2nd worst. There are worse places that are sizable in population for one reason or another. I would take Chicago winters over Cleveland or anywhere in upstate NY. In fact, I'd even take them over Boston. In terms of large cities, you could probably say top 5 worst but in terms of populated places, its definitely not as bad as some. Even when I lived near Des Moines, Iowa it was worse.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2003  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 10:34 PM
Investing In Chicago Investing In Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Who I was hanging out with? Everyone I worked with acted like this, numerous of my neighbors. people I didnt know who would randomly strike up conversations in public complaining, etc. Chicago is cold, but people act like theres literally nowhere worse in terms of populated places in the lower 48. It's so sad its laughable. If you get multiple days over the last handful of winters in the 50s, it's not even close to the worst. Sorry.

That is also your opinion about who has "worse winters." I've lived in multiple places of the midwest and Chicago is definitely not 2nd worst. There are worse places that are sizable in population for one reason or another. I would take Chicago winters over Cleveland or anywhere in upstate NY. In fact, I'd even take them over Boston. In terms of large cities, you could probably say top 5 worst but in terms of populated places, its definitely not as bad as some. Even when I lived near Des Moines, Iowa it was worse.
If the people you intwract think Chicago is “always below zero degrees” they should all be slept in the face for their stupidity.

I also meant 2nd worse of major cities, that’s probably why the reputation. Cleveland and upstate NY are worse in my opinion. I think Boston has slightly more tolerable winters than Chicago, but it’s splitting hairs. Depends if you like cold or snow better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2004  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 11:38 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Investing In Chicago View Post
If the people you intwract think Chicago is “always below zero degrees” they should all be slept in the face for their stupidity.

I also meant 2nd worse of major cities, that’s probably why the reputation. Cleveland and upstate NY are worse in my opinion. I think Boston has slightly more tolerable winters than Chicago, but it’s splitting hairs. Depends if you like cold or snow better.

Agree.. though for me it was so many people. I dont know why but strangers like to randomly tell me their problems in real life even when I dont say a word to them. Random strangers everywhere always had this type of attitude regarding the weather. So many people I interacted with thought Chicago was even worse than places like Minneapolis. I'd show my coworkers the weather in Minneapolis and they'd always have this dumbfounded look as if no place should be worse than Chicago.

Funniest thing I saw related to this was right after the blizzard in 2010 or 2011. The news was out in my neighborhood and a couple was out walking. Guy stops them on tv and asks how they're doing and if they've experienced anything like it before. The guy says something like "Actually we are visiting from Maine. We have this all the time and it's normal for us." and leaves without the guy on TV being able to get a word in. The look on his face was priceless iirc.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2005  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2019, 3:29 PM
Handro Handro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Agree.. though for me it was so many people. I dont know why but strangers like to randomly tell me their problems in real life even when I dont say a word to them. Random strangers everywhere always had this type of attitude regarding the weather. So many people I interacted with thought Chicago was even worse than places like Minneapolis. I'd show my coworkers the weather in Minneapolis and they'd always have this dumbfounded look as if no place should be worse than Chicago.

Funniest thing I saw related to this was right after the blizzard in 2010 or 2011. The news was out in my neighborhood and a couple was out walking. Guy stops them on tv and asks how they're doing and if they've experienced anything like it before. The guy says something like "Actually we are visiting from Maine. We have this all the time and it's normal for us." and leaves without the guy on TV being able to get a word in. The look on his face was priceless iirc.
Also it's not just Chicagoans. It's not uncommon for people from outside Chicago to think winters here are Siberia-level cold and snow. That's probably not in small part to our penchant for exaggeration.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2006  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2019, 12:49 AM
gandalf612 gandalf612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Andersonville, Chicago
Posts: 250
December 25

Made this one its own post since y'all usually want the Adler view larger. Full is linked to my Flickr

December 25, 2019 by Tomasz Wojtasik, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2007  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2019, 1:28 PM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,115
Beautiful. Just aching for a supertall in between trump and legacy. C'mon Thompson Center.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2008  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2019, 2:45 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,245
How perfect would of been if the skyneedle came to fruition...the exclamation point of all exclamations points for the skyline!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2009  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2019, 3:32 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Handro View Post
Also it's not just Chicagoans. It's not uncommon for people from outside Chicago to think winters here are Siberia-level cold and snow. That's probably not in small part to our penchant for exaggeration.
That's been my experience as well. A few factors I think:

1) Whenever it's really cold or it snows a lot in Chicago, it's on some of the news making some believe that it's more normal than it really is.

2) Some people in Chicago exaggerate making others believe that really cold temperatures occur much more frequently than they actually do in reality. Also, there are some people who completely have selective memories when it comes to temperatures. I guarantee that when Chicago gets pretty cold again next month, that many people will selectively forget that it was recently 20+ degrees above average for multiple days.


3) Many people visit Chicago during winter and they sometimes visit when it's really cold for a few days. I have multiple friends and co-workers who have visited during times like this and they believe that's how Chicago *always* is. Even though they only went for a few days, when you tell them their days there were not normal, they don't listen. I have 2 co-workers specifically like this. No amount of telling them how many winters you lived in Chicago will make them believe you over the 3 really cold days they experienced once.


And the sad part is that these things also prevent some people from moving to Chicago. I have multiple friends and co-workers who love Chicago and nearly all of them have said "I would totally move there if it wasn't so cold." And when I ask them how cold they think it is, routinely they think the average high in winter is 15 degrees F or even lower based on them once visiting in January during a cold spell or seeing the news. It's fun showing monthly temperatures and they sometimes realize it's not as cold on average as they thought and not much colder than where they currently are.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2010  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2019, 4:55 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Having fun with some data here. Here are a bunch of cities (and growing) and the number and percentage of days they failed to reach above 15 degrees for either the morning low or the afternoon high.

The data is for months January, February, March, and December of years 2016 thru 2019. 481 total days. The data is from accuweather.com

1. Winnipeg: 339 days | 70.48%
2. Edmonton: 282 days | 58.63%
3. Calgary: 251 days | 52.18%
4. Anchorage: 246 days | 51.14%
5. Montreal: 219 days | 45.53%
6. Minneapolis: 199 days | 41.37%
7T. Des Moines: 140 days | 29.11%
7T. Omaha: 140 days | 29.11%
9. Milwaukee: 111 days | 23.08%
10. Buffalo: 110 days | 22.87%
11T. Detroit: 92 days | 19.13%
11T. Toronto: 92 days | 19.13%
13. Chicago: 89 days | 18.5%
14. Pittsburgh: 74 days | 15.39%
15. Indianapolis: 72 days: 14.97%
16. Columbus, OH: 70 days | 14.55%
17. Denver: 62 days | 12.89%
18. Cleveland: 60 days | 12.47%
19. St. Louis: 54 days | 11.23%
20. Boise: 52 days | 10.81%
21T. Kansas City: 51 days | 10.6%
21T. Providence: 51 days | 10.6%
23. Boston: 44 days | 9.15%
24. Salt Lake City: 30 days | 6.24%
25. Philadelphia: 24 days | 4.99%
26. NYC: 23 days | 4.78%
27. Washington DC: 12 days | 2.49%
28. Baltimore | 11 days | 2.29%
29. Seattle | 1 day | 0.21%
30. Vancouver | 0 days | 0%
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing

Last edited by marothisu; Dec 28, 2019 at 8:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2011  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2019, 10:50 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Now back to some new statistics about the community areas of the city for 2018 based on the new ACS data. These are for various groups in the city born anywhere in the world. Only showing community areas with 100+ of a population.

The 4 areas that make up greater downtown now have close to 28,000 Asian Indians, Chinese, and Korean.

2018 Chinese alone population
1. Bridgeport: 12,188 people
2. Armour Square: 9521 people
3. Near West Side: 3787 people
4. McKinley Park: 3673 people
5. Brighton Park: 3511 people
6. Near North Side: 3079 people
7. The Loop: 2330 people
8. Hyde Park: 1883 people
9. Lake View: 1763 people
10. Lincoln Park: 1619 people
11. Douglas: 1371 people
12. Near South Side: 1279 people
13. Edgewater: 1002 people
14. Uptown: 793 people
15. Kenwood: 686 people
16. West Ridge: 670 people
17. West Town: 628 people
18. New City: 598 people
19. Archer Heights: 574 people
20. Woodlawn: 490 people
21. Rogers Park: 465 people
22. Lincoln Square: 415 people
23. West Elsdon: 407 people
24. Albany Park: 382 people
25. Logan Square: 340 people

The 4 areas that make up greater downtown area have 10,475 Chinese now. If you include Chinatown and all the adjacent areas along I-55 then it's over 40,000 Chinese people.

2018 Asian Indian alone population
1. West Ridge: 5298 people
2. Near West Side: 4719 people
3. Near North Side: 4687 people
4. The Loop: 2629 people
5. Lake View: 2031 people
6. Edgewater: 2017 people
7. Near South Side: 1974 people
8. Lincoln Park: 1503 people
9. Albany Park: 1489 people
10. Douglas: 1256 people
11. West Town: 1105 people
12. North Park: 1017 people
13. O'Hare: 1007 people
14. Uptown: 950 people
15. Lincoln Square: 782 people
16. Rogers Park: 710 people
17. Irving Park: 684 people
18. Logan Square: 613 people
19. Hyde Park: 538 people
20. North Center: 495 people
21. Forest Glen: 417 people
22. Avondale: 336 people
23. Bridgeport: 266 people
24. Jefferson Park: 242 people
25. Norwood Park: 216 people

The 4 areas that make up greater downtown now have over 14,000 Asian Indians.

2018 Filipino alone population
1. Albany Park: 2900 people
2. Portage Park: 2292 people
3. Irving Park: 2262 people
4. West Ridge: 2217 people
5. Dunning: 1834 people
6. Lincoln Square: 1379 people
7. Belmont Cragin: 1242 people
8. Lake View: 1201 people
9. Jefferson Park: 1187 people
10. Edgewater: 1138 people
11. Near South Side: 1043 people
12. North Park: 943 people
13. Near West Side: 931 people
14. West Town: 913 people
15. Near North Side: 912 people
16. Uptown: 744 people
17. Logan Square: 742 people
18. North Center: 588 people
19. O'Hare: 575 people
20. The Loop: 566 people
21. Norwood Park: 541 people
22. Forest Glen: 530 people
23. Avondale: 519 people
24. Rogers Park: 467 people
25. Lincoln Park: 354 people

2018 Korean alone population
1. Near North Side: 1178 people
2. Near West Side: 1081 people
3. West Town: 788 people
4. Lake View: 677 people
5. Albany Park: 674 people
6. Lincoln Park: 615 people
7. North Park: 560 people
8. West Ridge: 547 people
9. Uptown: 537 people
10. The Loop: 506 people
11. Logan Square: 499 people
12. Lincoln Square: 367 people
13. Near South Side: 356 people
14. Edgewater: 355 people
15. Hyde Park: 350 people
16. Portage Park: 243 people
17. Bridgeport: 239 people
18. Forest Glen: 237 people
19. Irving Park: 224 people
20. Rogers Park: 209 people
21. North Center: 184 people
22. Montclare: 178 people
23. Norwood Park: 175 people
24. Douglas: 171 people
25. Lower West Side: 163 people

2018 Vietnamese alone population
1. West Ridge: 2290 people
2. Uptown: 1184 people
3. Jefferson Park: 871 people
4. Albany Park: 824 people
5. North Park: 718 people
6. Edgewater: 399 people
7. Forest Glen: 358 people
8. Lincoln Square: 337 people
9. Near West Side: 271 people
10. Irving Park: 245 people
11. West Town: 200 people
12. Rogers Park: 197 people
13. Near North Side: 162 people
14. Avondale: 130 people
15. Lake View: 123 people
16. Lincoln Park: 121 people
17. Norwood Park: 116 people
18. Portage Park: 108 people

2018 Pakistani alone population
1. West Ridge: 3788 people
2. Edgewater: 525 people
3. North Park: 501 people
4. Uptown: 434 people
5. Lincoln Park: 339 people
6. Near West Side: 294 people
7. Lake View: 259 people
8. Chatham: 152 people
9. West Town: 148 people
10. Rogers Park: 129 people
11. Forest Glen: 124 people
12. Near North Side: 117 people
13. Near South Side: 117 people
14. The Loop: 107 people

2018 Japanese alone population
1. Near North Side: 633 people
2. Edgewater: 541 people
3. The Loop: 253 people
4. Lake View: 247 people
5. Irving Park: 223 people
6. West Ridge: 203 people
7. Lincoln Park: 198 people
8. Uptown: 190 people
9. Kenwood: 180 people
10. Albany Park: 174 people
11. Near West Side: 155 people
12. West Town: 148 people
13. Hyde Park: 140 people
14. North Park: 104 people
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2012  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2019, 11:32 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Now for the changes from 2010 to 2018 for these groups

Chinese alone population, change from 2010 to 2018
1. Near West Side: +2054 people
2. Bridgeport: +1709 people
3. Brighton Park: +1600 people
4. Near North Side: +1500 people
5. The Loop: +1341 people
6. McKinley Park: +1195 people
7. Douglas: +856 people
8. Lincoln Park: +838 people
9. Armour Square: +822 people
10. Hyde Park: +640 people
11. Near South Side: +640 people
12. Archer heights: +574 people
13. Lake View: +389 people
14. Woodlawn: +388 people
15. West Elsdon: +367 people
16. Kenwood: +333 people
17. Lower West Side: +245 people
18. West Town: +213 people
19. Garfield Ridge: +198 people
20. New City: +162 people
21. Albany Park: +120 people
22. Logan Square: +116 people
23. Irving Park: +102 people

The 4 areas that make up greater downtown area grew by about 5500 Chinese people during this time. If you include Chinatown plus all the adjacent areas along I55 then it's an increase of over 12,000 Chinese people from 2010 to 2018.

Indian alone population, change from 2010 to 2018
1. Near North Side: +2356 people
2. Near West Side: +1904 people
3. The Loop: +1336 people
4. Near South Side: +1313 people
5. Douglas: +731 people
6. Lake View: +609 people
7. Edgewater: +453 people
8T. Rogers Park: +450 people
8T. West Town: +450 people
10. North Park: +396 people
11. West Ridge: +389 people
12. Lincoln Park: +335 people
13. North Center: +205 people
14. Logan Square: +166 people
15. Lower West Side: +163 people
16. Avondale: +159 people
17. Woodlawn: +147 people
18. Hyde Park: +105 people
19. Austin: +103 people
20. O'Hare: +101 people

The 4 areas that make up greater downtown area grew by about 7000 Asian Indian people during this time.

Filipino alone population, change from 2010 to 2018
1. Dunning: +676 people
2. Jefferson Park: +558 people
3. Near South Side: +497 people
4. Belmont Cragin: +370 people
5. O'Hare: +331 people
6. The Loop: +304 people
7. Mount Greenwood: +242 people
8. West Town: +200 people
9. Lower West Side: +197 people
10. Portage Park: +182 people
11. Ashburn: +147 people
12. Hermosa: +144 people
13T. Albany Park: +103 people
13T. Armour Square: +103 people

Korean alone population, change from 2010 to 2018
1. West Town: +348 people
2. Near South Side: +211 people
3. The Loop: +197 people
4. Montclare: +178 people
5. Bridgeport: +166 people
6. Near North Side: +161 people
7. Lower West Side: +142 people
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2013  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 3:23 AM
Rooted Arborial Rooted Arborial is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 109
Looking at the fantastic image from Gandolf612 and thinking in terms of the possibility

of Chicago continuing to grow (which I am not assuming) and thinking that the city

needs to avoid the dulling density of some larger cities, I think it might be wise for

city planners to encourage the spread of taller structures in the south. They could have

better views of the skyline and the north-south priority could follow the river and keep

Chicago from feeling too dense. At this point, anything which might be taller than the

Sears tower would feel better to me if it was, at least as far south as the area along

the river between Harrison and Roosevelt. The near North side is becoming too densely

walled and this can end up feeling more impersonal and brutal. Spreading more of

the density which is found in the Loop will not make the city a better place to live.

The higher highs need the contrast of variable heights (and greenery) around them

to help the city breathe and have better access to natural light.

Also, the idea of the Sears tower becoming a supportive structural foil for a taller

building is setting the bar (of architectural presence) higher than any other city has had

to reach.

Last edited by Rooted Arborial; Dec 29, 2019 at 4:26 AM. Reason: clarity
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2014  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 7:26 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
The weather has been so warm lately that the snowpack to the north of us is going to be diminished quite a bit because they are getting rain like us instead of snow.

If a polar vortex even happened in the next few weeks it does not mean heavy snow. Usually deep cold produces little snow at all.




Thus far its been a mild winter. I don't think anyone would disagree with that statement.


But you never know what's going to happen in two weeks from now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2015  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 2:34 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 944
In the above photo, Vista and Sears complement each other wonderfully. In fact they look a little bit alike, with both buildings having a couple of setbacks, and from this distance their heights look fairly comparable. In this view, these two tallest buildings of Chicago (by roof height) look like the guardians of the city.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooted Arborial View Post
I think it might be wise for city planners to encourage the spread of taller structures in the south. They could have
better views of the skyline and the north-south priority could follow the river and keep Chicago from feeling too dense...The higher highs need the contrast of variable heights (and greenery) around them to help the city breathe and have better access to natural light.
I completely agree about the importance of avoiding overcrowding. Every time I am in Chicago I enjoy the breathing room, something that's sorely missing in a certain high-density city on the East Coast. On the other hand, we don't want Chicago's future supertalls to be too far apart. A case in point is Atlanta, whose tallest skyscrapers are too spread out IMO -- see for example this aerial video https://www.axiomimages.com/aerial-s.../view/AX38_030 . I was in Atlanta last month and the extreme sparseness of skyscrapers looked much worse than this video suggests.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2016  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 3:38 PM
Rooted Arborial Rooted Arborial is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 109
From Pianowizard,

A case in point is Atlanta, whose tallest skyscrapers are too spread out IMO -- see for example this aerial video https://www.axiomimages.com/aerial-s.../view/AX38_030 . I was in Atlanta last month and the extreme sparseness of skyscrapers looked much worse than this video
suggests.[/QUOTE]
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

You make a good point. There are a number of problems affecting Atlanta which relate to the density of buildings and the way the city works which are

possibly less in Chicago's much greater density. The chief being automobile pollution and the frustrations of sitting in traffic for longer periods of time.

Atlanta is a poorly designed hub and it exemplifies why better planning is needed. It boomed with the worship of the automobile and now it has worse

air pollution than Chicago. For Atlanta, the distance between the buildings might alleviate some of the congestion while Chicago might benefit from

wider spacing because it is already so much larger. We may be comparing an apple (pun) to a peach and assuming that the cultural needs of one is

the same as the other.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2017  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 5:04 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Here's some 2018 numbers by community area by certain Hispanic alone populations. This does not count people who indicate they're more than just one ancestry/ethnicity.

2018 Mexican alone population
1. South Lawndale: 57,709 people
2. Belmont Cragin: 44,553 people
3. Brighton Park: 35,486 people
4. Gage Park: 33,879 people
5. West Lawn: 24,898 people
6. Chicago Lawn: 23,766 people
7. New City: 22,351 people
8. Lower West Side: 22,005 people
9. East Side: 18,118 people
10. Humboldt Park: 17,223 people
11. Garfield Ridge: 16,301 people
12. Logan Square: 15,761 people
13. Ashburn: 15,638 people
14. Albany Park: 14,834 people
15. West Elsdon: 14,738 people
16. Avondale: 14,307 people
17. Portage Park: 14,189 people
18. Irving Park: 12,949 people
19. Clearing: 12,329 people
20. Hermosa: 11,317 people
21. West Ridge: 10,569 people
22. West Town: 10,212 people
23. Archer Heights: 9355 people
24. Rogers Park: 8621 people
25. McKinley Park: 8145 people
26. Dunning: 7767 people
27. Austin: 6962 people
28. Bridgeport: 6665 people
29. Uptown: 5573 people
30. Edgewater: 5473 people
31. South Chicago: 4988 people
32. Montclare: 4916 people
33. South Deering: 4476 people
34. Hegewisch: 4190 people
35. Near West Side: 4094 people
36. Lincoln Square: 4032 people
37. Lake View: 3868 people
38. O'Hare: 3154 people
39. Jefferson Park: 3094 people
40. Norwood Park: 2654 people

2018 Puerto Rican alone population
1. Belmont Cragin: 12,351 people
2. Humboldt Park: 10,433 people
3. Logan Square: 9209 people
4. West Town: 6567 people
5. Portage Park: 5960 people
6. Hermosa: 5363 people
7. Austin: 3840 people
8T. Avondale: 3568 people
8T. Irving Park: 3568 people
10. Dunning: 3140 people
11. Montclare: 2333 people
12. South Lawndale: 2108 people
13. Jefferson Park: 2099 people
14. Clearing: 1946 people
15. Norwood Park: 1825 people
16. Albany Park: 1494 people
17. Chicago Lawn: 1327 people
18. West Ridge: 1301 people
19. Lincoln Square: 1276 people
20. Garfield Ridge: 1267 people
21. East Side: 1176 people
22. Lower West Side: 1115 people
23. Lake View: 1016 people
24. Ashburn: 945 people
25. Uptown: 929 people

2018 Ecuadorian alone population
1. Albany Park: 2481 people
2. Belmont Cragin: 2431 people
3. Irving Park: 1745 people
4. Portage Park: 1458 people
5. Austin: 1401 people
6. Avondale: 1324 people
7. Humboldt Park: 1141 people
8. Logan Square: 1003 people
9. Hermosa: 759 people
10. Uptown: 593 people

2018 Salvadoran alone population
1. Avondale: 825 people
2. Belmont Cragin: 657 people
3. Portage Park: 471 people
4. Hermosa: 366 people
5. Logan Square: 290 people
6. South Lawndale: 289 people
7. Irving Park: 253 people
8. Lincoln Square: 240 people
9. West Lawn: 229 people
10. Jefferson Park: 187 people

2018 Peruvian alone population
1. Portage Park: 824 people
2. Dunning: 614 people
3. Irving Park: 518 people
4. Belmont Cragin: 397 people
5. Albany Park: 279 people
6. Near North Side: 209 people
7. Jefferson Park: 184 people
8. Logan Square: 167 people
9. Lincoln Square: 162 people
10. Hermosa: 145 people

2018 Colombian alone population
1. Belmont Cragin: 772 people
2. Portage Park: 756 people
3. Lake View: 594 people
4. West Ridge: 517 people
5. Albany Park: 424 people
6. Edgewater: 406 people
7. Logan Square: 397 people
8. West Town: 295 people
9. Austin: 285 people
10. Lincoln Square: 280 people

2018 Cuban alone population
1. Belmont Cragin: 700 people
2. Logan Square: 659 people
3. Lake View: 589 people
4. Portage Park: 482 people
5. Irving Park: 426 people
6. The Loop: 412 people
7. Edgewater: 392 people
8. Dunning: 325 people
9. Near North Side: 321 people
10. West Town: 306 people

2018 Honduran alone population
1. Belmont Cragin: 675 people
2. Albany Park: 514 people
3. South Lawndale: 342 people
4. Humboldt Park: 333 people
5. Jefferson Park: 321 people
6. Chicago Lawn: 307 people
7. Logan Square: 298 people
8T. New City: 290 people
8T. Portage Park: 290 people
10. Gage Park: 257 people
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2018  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 7:24 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Mexican alone population, change from 2010 to 2018
1. Garfield Ridge: +5037 people
2. Chicago Lawn: +4931 people
3. Belmont Cragin: +4630 people
4. Ashburn: +3817 people
5. Humboldt Park: +3274 people
6. Austin: +3093 people
7. Dunning: +2562 people
8. Clearing: +2230 people
9. West Lawn: +2197 people
10. West Elsdon: +2185 people
11. South Lawndale: +2040 people
12. Brighton Park: +1994 people
13. West Englewood: +1571 people
14. Near West Side: +1403 people
15. Portage Park: +1306 people
16. Gage Park: +1253 people
17. New City: +1214 people
18. Montclare: +978 people
19. Morgan Park: +894 people
20. The Loop: +860 people
21. Englewood: +755 people
22. North Lawndale: +714 people
23. Edgewater: +636 people
24. South Shore: +617 people
25. Archer heights: +584 people

Areas of town that went from not having many Mexican people in 2010 to having something more sizable in 2018include:

West Englewood: from 427 people to 1998 people
Englewood: from 51 people to 806 people
The Loop: from 511 people to 1371 people
South Shore: from 233 people to 850 people
Woodlawn: from 244 people to 606 people


Let's also do that same thing for Chinese population:
Archer Heights: from 0 people to 574 people
West Elsdon: from 40 people to 407 people
Woodlawn: from 102 people to 490 people
Douglas: from 515 people to 1371 people
Lincoln Park: from 781 people to 1619 people
The Loop: from 989 people to 2330 people
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2019  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 3:50 PM
Handro Handro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,270
I'm hoping someone can help me: I remember coming across a site a while back that allowed you to browse historical street imagery on a map (similar to google maps). Probably posted somewhere on this forum but I'm not sure if that's where I was originally introduced to it. I specifically remember looking around Garfield Park but the entire map of Chicago was available (although there weren't images for every street, of course). The images were high def as well, which was amazing.

Any clues?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2020  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 5:04 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
^^^

https://www.historicaerials.com/

That's the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.