HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #19601  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 4:00 AM
sukwoo sukwoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can leave buildings like this at will in old neighborhoods. There is a pestilence upon this land, nothing is sacred.


Perhaps the building would look better with some shrubbery?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19602  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 4:01 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can leave buildings like this at will in old neighborhoods. There is a pestilence upon this land, nothing is sacred.
Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19603  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 5:32 AM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
Mr. Downtown, what are you referring to?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19604  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 11:22 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
^1601 West Division, where someone has mistaken novelty for creativity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19605  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 1:11 PM
k1052 k1052 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
^1601 West Division, where someone has mistaken novelty for creativity.
The single story drive through bank that was originally going to be plopped here was certainly much more creative....

I'm not totally in love with how the design turned out but the overall package of the development fits exactly in the envelope of how land around mass transit should be used.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19606  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 2:38 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
^1601 West Division, where someone has mistaken novelty for creativity.
Golly, here I was just thinking it's both novel 'and' creative...
__________________
To have ambition was my ambition - Gang of Four
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19607  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 3:37 PM
sukwoo sukwoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can leave buildings like this at will in old neighborhoods. There is a pestilence upon this land, nothing is sacred.
Did anyone else get the Monty Python reference?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19608  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 4:40 PM
thewaterman11 thewaterman11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Morningside Heights, NY
Posts: 81
Delusions of grandeur: Union Station redevelopment

Stumbled upon a WBEZ article this morning about Union Station and some of its unused and underdeveloped areas.

http://www.wbez.org/blogs/lee-bey/20...evealed-108035

The Metropolitan Planning Council also has some photos of spaces like the old Women's Lounge, the roof, and tons of potential retail and restaurant space.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/metropl...th/9246715189/

With a good planner, I could see Union Station becoming a larger tourist attraction than it is now, with perhaps a flagship Apple store in the Women's Lounge and a couple good retail outlets... maybe even a restaurant off the Canal Street arcade. It would be nice to see Union Station be more than just an entry and exit point for commuters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19609  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 4:40 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
This page doesn't have any pictures on it, so..

GEMS school LSE has reached "pile of dirt" phase.


Click to embiggen.

Last week there were pile drivers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19610  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 5:32 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 939
^^ off topic, but what a cheapo addition SwissHotel tacked on. Deadly dull at street level and crap from above. I know that there are higher costs with building out a green roof, but honestly it looks like crap and it makes me think poorly of the hotel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19611  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 6:15 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I like it and definitely welcome more avant-garde, daring architecture, but am I the only one that thinks it would look much better if it had two floors of commercial, with a more substantial looking and proportioned base?
Yes, yes and mas si. And, in addition - the previous version with more glass coverage on the facade was superior.

With that stated, I still like it a lot, and it's a fantastic improvement for this neighborhood....hope it really begins a trend and we soon start to see a lot more like it here and elsewhere...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19612  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 6:20 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
^1601 West Division, where someone has mistaken novelty for creativity.

Testing out a new self-parody here or a good faith critique?

While I hope for the former, given history of strange, almost obsessive outspoken disdain for anything approaching irregular and/or random fenestration pattern, I expect and fear the latter....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19613  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 7:03 PM
killaviews's Avatar
killaviews killaviews is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 492
According to its Facebook page, phase 1 of Backyard Andersonville has started. Backyard Andersonville = 23 townhouses.

http://backyardandersonville.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19614  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 8:20 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by killaviews View Post
According to its Facebook page, phase 1 of Backyard Andersonville has started. Backyard Andersonville = 23 townhouses.

http://backyardandersonville.com/
Yep, a building permit was issued for it on June 19th. Speaking of other small but sizable development like it.. Building permit issued yesterday for 2008 N Whipple (Armitage and Whipple) in Logan Square near Humboldt Park, down the street from Parson's Chicken and Scofflaw. 24 detached units w/first floor retail ($3.6 million). This is currently a vacant lot and I believe it may be advertised as 3058 W Armitage too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19615  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 8:26 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
It looked like they were starting some work on the randolph side plaza of Prudential. Could be minor, but it looked like they were pulling up tiles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19616  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2013, 8:41 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Yep, a building permit was issued for it on June 19th. Speaking of other small but sizable development like it.. Building permit issued yesterday for 2008 N Whipple (Armitage and Whipple) in Logan Square near Humboldt Park, down the street from Parson's Chicken and Scofflaw. 24 detached units w/first floor retail ($3.6 million). This is currently a vacant lot and I believe it may be advertised as 3058 W Armitage too.
Yep, Armitage W of the Kennedy is really seeing a lot of infill.

I don't know what it is, but for some reason the E-W streets in Chicago have been filling in much more than the traditional N-S streets.

I'm thinking North Ave, Belmont, Armitage, Division, Chicago

Whereas favorites such as Clark, Lincoln, Broadway have done very little. I'm floored that the old Dominick's site (the one that burned down) still hasn't been developed. Absolutely prime real estate, sitting there empty.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19617  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2013, 1:09 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,608
Jones College Prep

__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19618  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2013, 1:28 AM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewaterman11 View Post
Stumbled upon a WBEZ article this morning about Union Station and some of its unused and underdeveloped areas.

http://www.wbez.org/blogs/lee-bey/20...evealed-108035

The Metropolitan Planning Council also has some photos of spaces like the old Women's Lounge, the roof, and tons of potential retail and restaurant space.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/metropl...th/9246715189/

With a good planner, I could see Union Station becoming a larger tourist attraction than it is now, with perhaps a flagship Apple store in the Women's Lounge and a couple good retail outlets... maybe even a restaurant off the Canal Street arcade. It would be nice to see Union Station be more than just an entry and exit point for commuters.
I missed this because we posted at about the same time. A few years ago I saw some kind of promising-looking proposal to re-do Union Station, but I guess that vanished.

The biggest thing preventing Union Station from being more convenient is the flimsy connection it has to local transit. The nearest L station is several blocks away across the river and not very tourist/first-timer friendly and no signage directing you there, and you're on your own for figuring out how to get a bus to or from there. With an L stop nearby or some kind of bus terminal with easy information about how to get to different places in the city, Union Station could easily be a major artery to get people flowing in and out of the city.

Also, the modern areas of the underground station are a huge confusing mess of identical-looking hallways and corridors and escalators that somehow take you to the same place you were when you got on them. I think they'd have to gut the whole thing and re-lay it out for it to be usable at all. Definitely needs more signage. Grand Central is huge and kind of labyrinthine but there's good signage and indicators to reassure you that you're at least headed in the right general direction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19619  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2013, 3:32 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
^ A bus terminal is forthcoming on the lot south of Union Station. It probably won't be able to berth all the bus routes, but it will be an easily-identifiable spot for buses that visitors might want (151 to Mag Mile, 124 to Navy Pier, 28 to Hyde Park). There will be a tunnel beneath Jackson to the station concourse, but I question how many people will be able to find it.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19620  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2013, 2:27 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
All the CTA routes will use the new facility, but the underground access will be through the "Track 0" baggage tunnel rather that a new tunnel. Still, it will help to have one bus boarding location rather than four. RTA has recently lettered the stops in an effort to make things a little easier to find, but Amtrak wouldn't let them put up any new signs inside, just mysterious red stickers saying "A" or "C."

There are signs on Clinton pointing the way to the Blue Line. But overall Union Station is one of the most incomprehensible interiors in the world—that's not a hospital.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:13 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.