HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2020, 5:06 PM
pico44's Avatar
pico44 pico44 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
^Will you knock it off with your asinine political blabber please... you sound silly and I'm stretched to the max with being embarrassed for the people I share a country with.

Damn you gotta chill out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #642  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2020, 5:55 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,671
i never knew depew place even had a name.

it would be interesting to do something more with it — i’m glad that alley came up in this early discussion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2020, 6:05 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by pico44 View Post
Damn you gotta chill out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2020, 6:14 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
i never knew depew place even had a name.

it would be interesting to do something more with it — i’m glad that alley came up in this early discussion.

There really is nothing to do with it. It’s not a street like Vanderbilt Avenue, open to the sky with room on the sides. It’s a back alley that’s serviced by postal vehicles and other trucks. The Park Avenue viaduct rises over it. It’s not exactly a space suitable for a plaza, and even if it were, it’s well hidden with little direct access. I like the city’s plan for 43rd street.

And for the rest of you, cool off, it’s Christmas.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2020, 1:53 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
CB5 should have gotten in their final comments for the draft tonight...


https://www.cb5.org/cb5m/calendar/20...y/#executive_1

__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2020, 2:19 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Just another look at the ground and second floor plans...











__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2021, 4:40 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Still now word on when or if the hotel will reopen. It's not looking likely.


JANUARY 2, 2021



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 1:07 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Is there another meeting today? If so, perhaps we’ll get a gift on the Eleventh Day of Christmas!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 5:12 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
Is there another meeting today? If so, perhaps we’ll get a gift on the Eleventh Day of Christmas!

It’s not on the agenda.

https://www.cb5.org/cb5m/?
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 6:47 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
It’s not on the agenda.

https://www.cb5.org/cb5m/?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2021, 1:22 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
MAS's comments on the draft scope...


https://www.mas.org/news/project-com...ric-resources/

Examining Project Commodore’s Potential Impact on Public Realm and Historic Resources


Comments to the Department of City Planning
JANUARY 13, 2021


Quote:
The Municipal Art Society of New York (MAS) supports Project Commodore’s commitment to improving transit capacity and pedestrian flow on one of the busiest blocks in the city. MAS also supports the proposed project’s expansion of publicly accessible space in an area desperately needing additional respite from the bustle of East Midtown.

However, MAS has several concerns about Project Commodore, particularly its public realm plan and relationship to nearby historic and visual resources. Our comments are focused on ways to improve these elements and adequately address impacts.
Quote:
Reconsidering the Chrysler and Graybar Terraces

MAS appreciates the applicants’ effort to provide outdoor public space that allows users to view surrounding landmarks and take in the activity of 42nd Street and Lexington Avenue. Yet we believe at least some of this space will neither feel truly public nor provide a welcoming experience for visitors. Public spaces above ground level face challenges that are difficult to overcome, even with a great commitment to do so. Specifically, elevating Chrysler Terrace poses a missed opportunity for a street-level plaza that would be more publicly accessible and serve to alleviate pedestrian crowding.

MAS is also concerned that Graybar Terrace will be heavily shadowed, windswept, and unappealing due to its walled-in location between Project Commodore and the Graybar Building.

MAS requests that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) study an alternative in which at least some of the Graybar Terrace space is shifted to Chrysler Terrace, exploring possibilities for either an expanded elevated terrace or a large ground level Chrysler Plaza.

We also request an examination of the potential for an indoor Privately Owned Public Space (POPS) running parallel to Lexington Avenue or if the Chrysler Terrace remains elevated, across Project Commodore’s lobby to Grand Central Terrace along the Park Avenue viaduct. If an alternative is deemed infeasible, MAS believes that the functionality of Graybar Terrace would at least be improved if it served as a pedestrian connection between Project Commodore and the Graybar Building.
Quote:
Anticipating the Future of the Park Avenue Viaduct

MAS believes that the Park Avenue viaduct will ultimately be most beneficial as a dedicated cyclist and pedestrian space (a function it already serves during the annual Summer Streets event). This concept was envisioned for the west side of the viaduct in Places for People: A Public Realm Vision Plan for East Midtown (2013).

Given the rapid transformation of the city’s streets during the COVID-19 pandemic, the DEIS should study the potential for a direct pedestrian connection between Grand Central Terrace and the East Balcony of Grand Central, including a contingency plan that preserves the lower level service road for vehicular access to the building.

In general, the applicants should approach their public space as a centerpiece of a larger pedestrian and cyclist network that includes the East 43rd Street Shared Street, Vanderbilt Plaza, Pershing Square, the Park Avenue Malls, and other nearby public spaces. To this end, the DEIS should clarify the rationale for reducing the number of required bicycle spaces.
Quote:
Anticipating the Future of the Park Avenue Viaduct

MAS believes that the Park Avenue viaduct will ultimately be most beneficial as a dedicated cyclist and pedestrian space (a function it already serves during the annual Summer Streets event). This concept was envisioned for the west side of the viaduct in Places for People: A Public Realm Vision Plan for East Midtown (2013). Given the rapid transformation of the city’s streets during the COVID-19 pandemic, the DEIS should study the potential for a direct pedestrian connection between Grand Central Terrace and the East Balcony of Grand Central, including a contingency plan that preserves the lower level service road for vehicular access to the building.

In general, the applicants should approach their public space as a centerpiece of a larger pedestrian and cyclist network that includes the East 43rd Street Shared Street, Vanderbilt Plaza, Pershing Square, the Park Avenue Malls, and other nearby public spaces. To this end, the DEIS should clarify the rationale for reducing the number of required bicycle spaces.
Quote:
Prioritizing Thermal Comfort

Because of East Midtown’s density, most neighborhood streets are never sufficiently daylit and suffer from intense wind and urban heat island effect. This means that considering human thermal comfort and the unique growing conditions for plants is especially critical at this location.

MAS requests that the DEIS evaluate the microclimate conditions created by the proposed project and their implication for each element of the public realm. For example, determining which programmatic elements are most sunlight-dependent and situating those on the brightest sides of the building. Similarly, examining how climate conditions would change over the course of the day and year, and implementing design strategies that would allow for extended use of the public realm during colder months (such as flexible seating arrangements, use of warm materials, creation of sun traps and wind screens, and strategic placement of deciduous vegetation). MAS urges the applicants to go beyond the minimum Special Midtown District daylight evaluation requirement and conduct more comprehensive evaluations of lux and thermal comfort.
Quote:
HISTORIC AND VISUAL RESOURCES

Project Commodore will be situated amongst one of the most significant collections of historic architecture in the city: Grand Central Terminal, the Chrysler Building, the Chanin Building, and the New York Post Building are all designated landmarks.

The site itself is physically and historically tied to Grand Central and its role as the hub of Terminal City. While the applicants have included outdoor publicly accessible space and expanded sidewalks, MAS is concerned about the loss of visual connections to area landmarks from the site and within the study area. The DEIS should show alternative massing scenarios that better complement existing landmarks and improve views to landmarks in the study area. MAS also requests additional human-scale views to landmarks from within the broader study area (rather than just from the immediately adjacent streets) and views of the tower looking up from the publicly accessible open space and sidewalks below.

MAS is also concerned about the project’s potential to obstruct views of designated landmark buildings, particularly the Chrysler Building, from areas outside Midtown Manhattan. The CEQR Technical Manual requires detailed analysis of changes to building scale and the city skyline. Changes to the skyline should be studied from existing vantage points, including, but not limited to, locations in Brooklyn and Queens. The DEIS must include a detailed assessment of Urban Design and Visual Resources impacts from both within and outside of the study area, including alternatives or mitigation measures.

CONCLUSION

MAS supports necessary improvements to transit and the public realm at the Project Commodore site. However, we believe that a project of this significance and magnitude merits further consideration, refinement, and a level of evaluation that goes beyond the minimum requirements of CEQR. MAS looks forward to the evaluation analysis, presentation of alternatives, and further details on impact mitigation so that the project is well-experienced at the site level and harmonious with the surrounding historic context.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2021, 6:13 PM
Sky88's Avatar
Sky88 Sky88 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 379
^^^
So the MAS would like to see more designs of the Grand Hyatt tower?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2021, 1:39 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky88 View Post
^^^
So the MAS would like to see more designs of the Grand Hyatt tower?
They would like to see a lot of things, but this is really addressing the scope for the environmental review, not anything revolving around a specific design other than what's proposed.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #654  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2021, 10:57 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
This should be the design reveal....


https://www.cb5.org/cb5m/calendar/2021-february/

Quote:
LANDMARKS

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2021, at 6:00pm


Project Commodore (the Grand Hyatt redevelopment) project update.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #655  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 12:01 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
I hope that it’s the actual design and not a massing model like was shown for the MTA site on Madison, which said in small print that it was not the actual design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #656  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 12:17 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I hope that it’s the actual design and not a massing model like was shown for the MTA site on Madison, which said in small print that it was not the actual design.
It should be the design. This would specifically have to do with Landmarks approval of the design in conjunction with Grand Central, so there will have to be details of the actual design. Besides that, it's what the developers said they would do.

That design shown for the Madison Ave tower was obviously not detailed as final. It wasn't an actual rendering that you would get. In any case, buildings are always being refined, even when after final approval, and sometimes even during construction.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #657  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 2:05 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
It should be the design. This would specifically have to do with Landmarks approval of the design in conjunction with Grand Central, so there will have to be details of the actual design. Besides that, it's what the developers said they would do.

That design shown for the Madison Ave tower was obviously not detailed as final. It wasn't an actual rendering that you would get. In any case, buildings are always being refined, even when after final approval, and sometimes even during construction.
I just hope that the jerks on these committees don’t interfere with the 1,650’ height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #658  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 3:08 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I just hope that the jerks on these committees don’t interfere with the 1,650’ height.
I’m sure there’ll be some comment on it, but the height isn’t really the issue. From what I’ve seen so far, most have been concerned about ground level issues, and rightfully so. It’s a very sensitive location. A few even said it was a “fabulous” project. But there’s always somebody who only sees height, even if it isn’t on the table.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #659  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 3:43 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
I’m sure there’ll be some comment on it, but the height isn’t really the issue. From what I’ve seen so far, most have been concerned about ground level issues, and rightfully so. It’s a very sensitive location. A few even said it was a “fabulous” project. But there’s always somebody who only sees height, even if it isn’t on the table.
Obviously, this tower has the potential to be the NYC landmark skyscraper. I really hope that it is built at 1,650'.


Can you say "Greatest City in the World, boys and girls?"

Last edited by chris08876; Jan 29, 2021 at 12:27 AM. Reason: Just to keep the thread folks not buggin out. Mr Rogers was indeed great
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #660  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2021, 7:04 AM
faridnyc faridnyc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 304
Grand hyatt meaning 6m below the tip of taipei 101, i hope they will push it to 520m height .
Why not 550m .
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.