HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2010, 8:32 AM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
When would Staten Island get a decent connection....
Perhaps, by extending the 1 line to a new tunnel beyond the South Ferry station in Lower Manhattan to St. George on Staten Island. That will allow for connections with the Staten Island Railway, the Staten Island terminus of the ferry and Richmond County ballpark.
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2010, 3:37 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 9,116
No way. No how.
__________________
Beatboxing under the bath water


He is a serpent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2010, 8:40 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC4Life View Post
Perhaps, by extending the 1 line to a new tunnel beyond the South Ferry station in Lower Manhattan to St. George on Staten Island. That will allow for connections with the Staten Island Railway, the Staten Island terminus of the ferry and Richmond County ballpark.
I can only imagine the many many billions that would cost. Probably better to wait for the Bayonne Bridge replacement and include rail in the design and go into Manhattan through the PATH tunnels.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 3:10 PM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
WABC-TV New York / Associated Press

Christie says he'd consider helping fund subway link
Updated at 08:42 AM today

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?se...ork&id=7805339

Quote:
TRENTON -- Gov. Chris Christie, who halted construction last month on a new commuter rail tunnel between New Jersey and New York City, said Monday that he would consider contributing to a cheaper alternative: extending New York's No. 7 subway line under the Hudson River to New Jersey.

Speaking on Millennium Radio's "Ask the Governor" program Monday night, Christie said extending the No. 7 line from Manhattan through Hoboken and onto Secaucus is "a much better idea" than the tunnel that was the nation's most expensive public works project.

Christie scrapped that project because of potential cost overruns, forfeiting $3 billion in federal funds that had been approved. New Jersey could be on the hook to repay the federal government $350 million already spent.

Christie said he hadn't yet spoken with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg about the proposal. Policymakers in Bloomberg's office have been discussing whether it would be possible to extend the line.
"This is an example of what can happen when you decide to take a strong, principled stand on something," Christie said. "If something is necessary, people find other ideas that are more equitable."

Christie said the proposed subway extension has three points in its favor: It would be cheaper than the scrapped tunnel, it would connect to Penn Station and Grand Central Station and would have funding from New York City and state.

He then chided Sen. Frank Lautenberg for not speaking up on behalf of the new idea. Lautenberg helped secure federal funding for the rail tunnel.

The $8.7 billion project to construct a second rail tunnel between New Jersey and New York was 15 years in the making when Christie killed it Oct. 27. Former Gov. Jon Corzine broke ground on the project amid his re-election campaign against Christie.

Christie later accused the former governor of rushing the start of the project for political gain; Corzine said he was creating jobs.

New Jersey was expected to shoulder $2.7 billion of the costs, plus overruns. The federal government and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey had each committed $3 billion to the project.

Before the most recent idea goes anywhere, it would need support from Christie, Bloomberg, who's an independent, and New York Gov.-elect Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat. U.S. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., offered his support in obtaining federal funds to make the idea work.



(Copyright ©2010 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 3:13 PM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
WABC-TV New York

New York City considering bike-sharing plan
Updated at 06:18 AM today

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?se...ork&id=7805168

Quote:
NEW YORK (WABC) -- Critics say there are too many bicycles wheeling around New York City. But now, there are plans for a bike-sharing program that could put thousands more on the streets.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is expected to push ahead with the plans Tuesday, launching an effort that could make thousands of bicycles available for public use.

The city is reportedly set to request proposals from companies interested in running kiosks to rent the bikes. If those kiosks become a reality, New York would join a string of American cities now trying out similar measures.

A bike-sharing program in Washington, D.C. started in September. A day pass costs just $5, with annual membership going for $75.
But in New York City, there are concerns that too many bikes are already roaming the streets. The NYPD is in the middle of a crackdown on cyclists, issuing large amounts of summonses to delivery people, pedicab drivers and regular commuters.

"People are extremely frustrated, they're nervous," New York City Councilman Daniel Garodnick said. "It's a dangerous situation, and that's why it's important that police have stepped it up and done some strong enforcement out here."

If implemented, the bike-sharing plan would take effect next year.



(Copyright ©2010 WABC-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 4:10 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,182
It will be 20+ years before a 7 train extension to Secaucus could come to fruition. The MTA should focus on Metro-North, LIRR, and improvements to the subways. Leave NJ to suffer the consequences of their own bad choices.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 4:13 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 51,987
Regardless of extra cost the tunnel should be commuter rail to traverse long distances, not a short range rapid transit line to go through it, unless it was thrown in, in addition to a commuter rail line.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 4:27 PM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
Am I the only one who isn't digging those new taxi proposals?
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 8:21 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 9,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
It will be 20+ years before a 7 train extension to Secaucus could come to fruition. The MTA should focus on Metro-North, LIRR, and improvements to the subways. Leave NJ to suffer the consequences of their own bad choices.
I'm not sure the region, like the country, has the luxury to make transport policy based on absurd, meaningless jurisdictional lines and worse yet, fueled by revenge and contempt for literal neighbors and shared benefactors. Such protocol will just accelerate our non-competitiveness to ______________(fill in the blank with any number of developed and emerging centers of business and commerce - the list is long).
__________________
Beatboxing under the bath water


He is a serpent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 8:52 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I'm not sure the region, like the country, has the luxury to make transport policy based on absurd, meaningless jurisdictional lines and worse yet, fueled by revenge and contempt for literal neighbors and shared benefactors. Such protocol will just accelerate our non-competitiveness to ______________(fill in the blank with any number of developed and emerging centers of business and commerce - the list is long).
That's already been done and NJ did it. The possbility of any new service is dead for two decades until Amtrak decides to build new tunnels and NJT piggy backs along.

I just see no reason for the MTA to expend their limited resources in this area at present when they have a number of other worthy projects that have been on the sidelines for much longer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 9:29 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 27,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
It will be 20+ years before a 7 train extension to Secaucus could come to fruition. The MTA should focus on Metro-North, LIRR, and improvements to the subways. Leave NJ to suffer the consequences of their own bad choices.
It wouldn't even take a decade to build.

Even the ARC project, which is much more ambitious, wouldn't take a decade.

Much of the 7 train extension would be on the surface, paralleling the Amtrak-NJ Transit line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2010, 11:02 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
It wouldn't even take a decade to build.

Even the ARC project, which is much more ambitious, wouldn't take a decade.

Much of the 7 train extension would be on the surface, paralleling the Amtrak-NJ Transit line.
Engineering, multiple EIS, alternatives analysis, public hearings, funding agreements, etc...

If all that was in hand at this moment you'd be right, actual construction would only take a few years. But it isn't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2010, 1:50 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 27,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
Engineering, multiple EIS, alternatives analysis, public hearings, funding agreements, etc...

If all that was in hand at this moment you'd be right, actual construction would only take a few years. But it isn't.
Again, no, it doesn't take anywhere close to that long.

The ARC doesn't take 10 years.

Even the current 7 train extension is taking about 7-8 years from start to finish.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2010, 3:42 AM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Again, no, it doesn't take anywhere close to that long.

The ARC doesn't take 10 years.

Even the current 7 train extension is taking about 7-8 years from start to finish.
NJT's own construction timetable was 9 years.

The project itself was first put forth around 1995 and wouldn't have be done until 2018 at the earliest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2010, 3:47 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,150
Yes , but this plan is short sighted since NJT can't expand its network west and south. I wish Politicians would shut there mouths and think , projects that sound good aren't always good in Real life.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #356  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2010, 4:19 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 9,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
The project itself was first put forth around 1995 and wouldn't have be done until 2018 at the earliest.

Early talk ≠ Aggressive planning and preparation
__________________
Beatboxing under the bath water


He is a serpent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2010, 4:40 AM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Early talk ≠ Aggressive planning and preparation
We would be at the "early talk" stage of any possible 7 line extension.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #358  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2010, 5:40 AM
Phil_North Phil_North is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 179
7 line extension

According to nycsubway.org, this is not the first time an extension the NYC subway to NJ has been proposed.

http://www.nycsubway.org/articles/erj-1926-njplan.html

Here is an excerpt:

Quote:
Principal features of a comprehensive plan for passenger transportation between communities in the nine northern counties of New Jersey and the city of New York are outlined in a report submitted on Jan. 15 to the Legislature of the state by the North Jersey Transit Commission. A preliminary report presented about a year ago was abstracted in Electric Railway Journal for Feb. 7, 1925, page 222. The ultimate object of the program recommended is the creation of a new electric railway system comprising 82.6 miles of route, and the electrification of 399 route-miles of railroad now operated by steam. As the first step it is proposed to construct an interstate loop line 17.3 miles in length connecting with all of the north Jersey commuters' railroads and passing under the Hudson River into New York City by two tunnels, one uptown and one downtown. A new low-level subway through Manhattan would complete the loop. Construction costs of this preliminary project are estimated at $154,000,000, with $40,000,000 additional for equipment. The cost of power facilities is not included in this estimate.

In developing the plan three separate problems were considered. The first was to furnish rapid transit facilities for the area within 20 miles of New York City and to connect this area with Manhattan by facilities providing service comparable to that of present subways. The second problem was to provide eventually for a commuter or suburban transit service for the area within 40 miles of New York City. The third was to utilize the existing rapid transit facilities, the Hudson & Manhattan, the Interborough and the Brooklyn-Manhattan systems to serve North Jersey more effectively than at present.

As the result of the study of these problems the commission has recommended a program consisting of six principal parts. Listed in the order of their importance, they are as follows: (1) Construction of a new North Jersey rapid transit system. (2) Hudson & Manhattan Railroad extensions in New Jersey. (3) Interborough extensions of its Manhattan lines to New Jersey. (4) Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit system extensions from Manhattan to New Jersey. (5) Extension of north Jersey rapid transit system, listed as part one of this program, to serve a larger area. (6) Electrification of existing steam railroads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #359  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2010, 5:27 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 9,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dac150 View Post
Am I the only one who isn't digging those new taxi proposals?
I think the consensus is that, with the exception of the Turkish entry which doesn't have a chance of winning, the proposals are very underwhelming. Taxi of the future? Yeah, sure. The only standing American company, Ford, is proposing a slightly modified panel van in the Transit Connect which just recently started sales in the US. The argument is that the NY metro taxi vehicle market and the entire US market isn't large enough to warrant a specialized and purpose built vehicle and the expense factory tooling to manufacture them. I say that's bunk. How and why did Checker do it then and last sooo many years? How to NA transit bus manufacturers who build 500-2000 buses a year do it? What should have occurred here is domestic innovation coming out of the woodwork, including industrial designers and then partnering with major manufacturers. Instead, one US company, who apparently barely made an effort is the likely winner. And the competition was called Taxi of the Future? How hard is it really to change up your body styling and incorporate A/V features like the Turkish bid? It appears they barely got off the couch for this one. A shocking lack of imagination. Pathetic.
__________________
Beatboxing under the bath water


He is a serpent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2010, 6:16 PM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
10:03 AM
Report: TLC Considers Dress Code For Cabbies
By: NY1 News

http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stori...de-for-cabbies

Quote:
While riders may not pay much attention to how their cabbie is dressed, the city reportedly wants taxi drivers to take better stock of their own appearance.

The New York Times says the Taxi and Limousine Commission is planning a new dress code for cabbies that would require them to "present a professional appearance.''

The current dress code bans tube shirts, tank tops and bathing trunks -- with fines for violators.

But the revised code doesn't mention specific types of clothing.

TLC chairman David Yassky tells the Times that while enforcement may prove difficult, the new code is more of an attempt to establish standards.

The code changes are expected to be approved next month.



Copyright © 2010 NY1 News. All rights reserved.
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:57 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.