HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3741  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2022, 5:47 PM
edale edale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
They don't. Train traffic absolutely dominates that corridor. The only flights are the business shuttles.

The only people who fly from NY to DC are business travelers, doing last minute trips on the shuttles. And even then, Acela usually makes more sense. Budget travelers take the regular Amtrak trains, or the dozens of private bus carriers (or, obviously, drive, like most Americans).

I'm genuinely amazed that Angelinos would endure a flight to Vegas instead of driving a few hours. Sounds bizarre. Do they fly to San Diego and Santa Barbara too? Those corridors have tons of traffic. And unlike I-15, which is only two lanes, you can't expand the road capacity.
I lived in DC, and know many, many people who flew from Reagan National to one of the NYC airports. And they weren't business travelers. Delta Shuttle was a particularly popular choice for people making this trip, as it was pretty cheap and they had an expedited check-in/security experience. I have flown that route myself for a weekend trip to NYC. United alone operates 32 daily flights between NYC and DC, and that only represents 40% of the capacity share for that flight market: https://www.routesonline.com/news/29...c-frequencies/

I don't know why you're amazed that people fly rather than making a 4-6 hour drive. LA to Vegas is more than twice as far as San Diego or Santa Barbara, so I'm not sure why you're even bringing those cities up other than potentially not understanding California geography. According to this article, Las Vegas to LA is the busiest airline route in the country: https://www.oag.com/busiest-routes-r...20last%20month.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3742  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2022, 5:59 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
Las Vegas trains are currently planned to terminate in Victorville, 80 miles from LA Union Station. They'll be able to piggy-back on the tunneled CAHSR entrance to Los Angeles at Palmdale.
Rancho Cucamonga now with the planned Cajon Pass extension, and I have to assume they will find a way to get Brightline trains to LAUS or do a timed transfer to Metrolink.

The High Desert Corridor route from Victorville to Palmdale never made much sense to me. Adding HSR there was a way to greenwash a terrible sprawl-generating freeway and get exurban votes for LA County's Measure R and Measure M. Supposedly the "intention" was to make SF-LV also a profitable HSR market, but the distance is too far and the route too convoluted compared to air travel and driving.

Extending Brightline to Rancho is a better move, it opens the door for a future southward extension to San Diego. I think SD-LV is a more realistic market for rail, it's right at the sweet spot of ~300miles.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3743  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2022, 6:19 PM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,527
I think doing both is the answer. It can easily plug into the HSR at Palmdale and serve all population coming from the north. And it can plug into Rancho and serve all the population in the LA basin + southward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3744  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2022, 6:32 PM
markb1 markb1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 21
CaHSR from Palmdale to Union Station will take probably under 30 minutes. Metrolink from Rancho Cucamonga takes 1 hour and 17 minutes. I think connecting Brightline West to CaHSR in Palmdale makes plenty of sense once CaHSR arrives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3745  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2022, 6:39 PM
LAsam LAsam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by markb1 View Post
A big reason to take a train to Vegas instead of driving would be to avoid the nasty traffic that happens on I-15 at times. A reason not to would be not having a good way to get around once you're in Vegas. But on most of my trips there, I've just stayed in a small area on the strip, so I don't think I would have missed having a car. Train wins!
The dreaded "last mile" issue with public transportation. You could easily get around this using Uber/Lyft... or if there were shuttle buses from the rail terminal to all the major casinos running at regular intervals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3746  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2022, 6:59 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by edale View Post
I lived in DC, and know many, many people who flew from Reagan National to one of the NYC airports. And they weren't business travelers. Delta Shuttle was a particularly popular choice for people making this trip, as it was pretty cheap and they had an expedited check-in/security experience. I have flown that route myself for a weekend trip to NYC. United alone operates 32 daily flights between NYC and DC, and that only represents 40% of the capacity share for that flight market: https://www.routesonline.com/news/29...c-frequencies/
The number of daily flights between DC and New York and Newark is of limited relevance because both Dulles and JFK and Newark are major international hubs and much of this is to provide connecting traffic. A passenger might fly from DCA to JFK and then connect to Europe or the Middle East.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3747  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2022, 11:16 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,832
I suspect that those who question why people fly between Las Vegas and Los Angeles have never actually driven that route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3748  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 12:09 AM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
I suspect that those who question why people fly between Las Vegas and Los Angeles have never actually driven that route.
Haha 100%. As someone that goes to Vegas 4 or 5 times a year, I usually fly half the time. If flying out of Burbank, I'll get there 30 min before, 45 min fight and all in all, 2 hours max until I'm at the hotel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3749  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 12:09 AM
LAsam LAsam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
I suspect that those who question why people fly between Las Vegas and Los Angeles have never actually driven that route.


Who doesn't like getting stuck in stop and go traffic in the middle of the desert?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3750  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 2:35 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,374
That gives you more time for shoulder pep talks.


___
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3751  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 11:55 AM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
High-speed rail stations ‘one step closer to reality’ in the Central Valley

By Manny Gomez
Oct. 20, 2022


Conceptual Rendering Bakersfield Station Courtesy of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. (Image via KSEE)


"FRESNO, Calif. (KSEE/KGPE) – The design contract for the Central Valley’s high-speed rail stations has been approved by the California High-Speed Rail Board – another step towards making the project a reality.

On Thursday, the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s (Authority) Board of Directors unanimously approved awarding the design and support services contract for the Merced, Fresno, Kings/Tulare, and Bakersfield stations that will serve high-speed rail passengers on the initial 171-mile segment.

The Authority awarded an approximately $35 million station design contract to Foster + Partners and Arup for the first two separately funded phases..."

https://www.yourcentralvalley.com/ne...entral-valley/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3752  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 1:53 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Rancho Cucamonga now with the planned Cajon Pass extension, and I have to assume they will find a way to get Brightline trains to LAUS or do a timed transfer to Metrolink.
The Metrolink tracks from LA Union out to Ontario and beyond aren't going to be upgraded until CAHSR Phase 2. So it's going to be a relatively slow ride, even if it's a one-seat ride. The Las Vegas trains will need to travel all the way to Anaheim to be serviced and turned, which isn't really a bad thing, because one of the great strengths of the CAHSR plan which nobody seems to realize is that Orange County is going to have all of the train service that LA Union has.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3753  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 2:24 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
The Metrolink tracks from LA Union out to Ontario and beyond aren't going to be upgraded until CAHSR Phase 2. So it's going to be a relatively slow ride, even if it's a one-seat ride. The Las Vegas trains will need to travel all the way to Anaheim to be serviced and turned, which isn't really a bad thing, because one of the great strengths of the CAHSR plan which nobody seems to realize is that Orange County is going to have all of the train service that LA Union has.
One of my friends passed through the Anaheim ARTIC station this week. It is a beautiful, shiny, station but he said it has about the same ridership as the Twinbrook WMATA station in DC, a relatively small metro station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3754  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 7:04 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by 202_Cyclist View Post
One of my friends passed through the Anaheim ARTIC station this week. It is a beautiful, shiny, station but he said it has about the same ridership as the Twinbrook WMATA station in DC, a relatively small metro station.
It's a 2-platform station right now. One day it's going to have 10+ HSR arrivals and departures per hour, plus electrified Metrorail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3755  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 9:58 PM
twinpeaks twinpeaks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
It's a 2-platform station right now. One day it's going to have 10+ HSR arrivals and departures per hour, plus electrified Metrorail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3756  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2022, 10:13 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
It's a 2-platform station right now. One day it's going to have 10+ HSR arrivals and departures per hour, plus electrified Metrorail.
You mean Metrolink right? When is Metrolink planning to go electric by?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3757  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2022, 3:46 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
You mean Metrolink right? When is Metrolink planning to go electric by?
The extremely specific date of sometime in the future.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3758  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2022, 6:02 AM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
When is Metrolink planning to go electric by?
I doubt that they will rebuild the Metrolink corridor between Burbank and Anaheim before ground is broken on the tunnel or tunnels between Palmdale and Burbank.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3759  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2022, 6:43 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,374
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3760  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2022, 1:55 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
^Somebody explain the track configuration at the station...it's going to be a terminal station, at least for awhile, so it looks like there is an extra track that allows trains stored on the tail tracks to bypass the station.

Also, there are no express tracks...so will all trains on the future spur to Sacramento be locals?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.