Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7
..crosspost..
130 would obviously be the best option here, with 110 N Wacker many years out considering it's occupied and demo duration and Sears upgrade at least two years from completion. 130 is only 2+ years out and it would be hard to ignore its aesthetic appeal, not to mention the BofA agreement would be large enough to perhaps get naming rights.
|
Willis Tower doesn't have any large blocks of contiguous space available for a year or two. We'd wanted to bring another 400 or so workers into the Tower and were looking to boost our space by another 100,000 or so square feet. There was zero availability within the next year or two for large contiguous spaces (so nothing north of 200,000) and the unoccupied spaces were not that attractive. If they're going to try and shoehorn 500,000 square feet worth of space into Willis Tower then it's going to likely be in scattered spaces unless they wait a few years for non-renewing tenants (not sure who, United is that largest tenant atm with about 900,000 square feet leased).