HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


View Poll Results: Monarchy - Keep or Ditch?
Keep 149 52.28%
Ditch 136 47.72%
Voters: 285. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 3:54 PM
Vaillant Vaillant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 935
ditch that crap!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 4:08 PM
samne's Avatar
samne samne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastend
Posts: 3,729
Ditch, but gradually.

For starters, Queen Elizabeth should be the last monarch on our money.

The GG. Kinda dont mind the way it works, but perhaps can be modified for more of an all Canadian direction.

I said it last time this thread came up. I dont mind some symbolic gestures to keep with history and tradition. We dont need to dis the royal family like we're revolutionary France.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 5:02 PM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Ah yes, the medieval genetic engineering program of the 12th century sure reaped rewards for the royal family once they managed to wipe out one quarter of their serfs with their newly created plague bacteria.
They attempted the same thing merely a few years ago (unbeknownst to most, of course) - Queen Elizabeth tours Canada for her Golden Jubilee late 2002; SARS hits Canada early 2003. Hmmmmmm...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 5:06 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,184
Ditch 'em.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 5:11 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Ah yes, the medieval genetic engineering program of the 12th century sure reaped rewards for the royal family once they managed to wipe out one quarter of their serfs with their newly created plague bacteria.
Too bad the royal family has genetically de-engineered itself through inbreeding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 5:16 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,688
I say ditch the British monarchy..

I will volunteer to be Canada's new monarch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 5:38 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
Ditch, but I say that because my significant other has returned from a 6 month work term in England in a social work position. That country is going down hill fast, half the people cant stand the monarchy and right in the middle of a huge UK recession, the royals throw a 100 million dollar wedding extravaganza. So out of touch........Whats it like to live in a fairy tale every day?
__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 7:18 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Unapologetic Occidental
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 68,143
Ditch... if we can concretely spell out a good alternative. Not saying there are not good alternatives, but they have to be well thought out and explored when you consider that our entire set-up is predicated upon having a monarch at the top.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 8:04 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
If we lose the British monarch we should create a Canadian monarch. If we ditch the monarch completely then I'm moving. My loyalty is to the crowd first, country second.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 10:51 PM
Vaillant Vaillant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooster View Post
I say ditch the British monarchy..

I will volunteer to be Canada's new monarch.
my great great great grand mother was the cousin of Queen Victoria so i think i have more chances than you!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 11:01 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
If we lose the British monarch we should create a Canadian monarch. If we ditch the monarch completely then I'm moving. My loyalty is to the crowd first, country second.
Technically, the crown and the country are the same thing...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 11:57 PM
Overground's Avatar
Overground Overground is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 903
The Queen/Sovereign/head of state is already Canadian.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------




So I'll ask what I always do in these silly monarchy discussions over the years and never get a reply back.............



How is Canada's constitutional monarchy system fundamentally failing Canada?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 12:32 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoscStudent View Post
I think we could easily manage to have 11 heads of state for less the $50 million a year. Elections could be held during general elections so the cost would be virtually nothing extra and there is no reason for them to live the lifestyles they do now. We'd need to spend roughly $5 million a year for each head of state to equal the cost of what we pay for the monarchy. They also don't need to be elected.
Do you have any idea why they cost so much (and keep in mind, that most of the cost is for the governor general)? I'll give you a hint. It has nothing to do with how the gg lives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 2:37 AM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
Keep.

Just because I want years of Kate coming here..

(Just kidding, I actually have my reasons)
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 3:37 AM
habfanman habfanman is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,122
Ditch.

I have a great deal of respect for Liz but after her, let's seize the day and rid ourselves of this outdated mode of government.

I was in Berlin during the Royal Wedding. There was a great deal of interest in the event (mainly young, female interest- fairy tale wedding interest) and they deployed the video screen for the only time during the 2 months that I stayed there (at a hostel- CityStay Mitte woop woop!). I refused to watch the debacle and when a German buddy of mine questioned me as to why, I explained that the British Queen was still our head of state and that I wasn't happy with that. He replied "That's funny, I thought that Canada had grown up".

How do you respond to that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 3:40 AM
artvandelay's Avatar
artvandelay artvandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The City of Cows
Posts: 1,670
Ditch 'em - but after Liz passes.

It's an embarrassment that our head of state is a foreigner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 4:28 AM
ToxiK ToxiK is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Most of the costs for the Governor General and Lieutenant Governors is in their offices, which have a staff of dozens of people and perform a variety of functions.
Maybe we should let the provinces who choose to get rid of their lieutenant-Governor. That will be that much money saved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 4:29 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
I don't understand why we need to import foreign heads of state when we have our own highly charismatic home-grown candidates.


Source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 4:54 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 11,998
So, what does Harper think of this question?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2011, 5:06 AM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overground View Post
So I'll ask what I always do in these silly monarchy discussions over the years and never get a reply back.............

How is Canada's constitutional monarchy system fundamentally failing Canada?
That is a very good question. Anyone care to comment?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.