Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownTown
The way this is being build is just so backwards. Normally you start on the most difficult sections first since they will take longer to build, but CAHSR is building the simplest sections first which means much longer delays getting the whole system up and running.
|
Look, here's the thing: They have to build operable segments. The IOS is the minimum-operating segment (that is, the thing which on it's own gives them the most runway to work with for beginning passenger services).
There are myriad interim solutions to complement IOS services (ie. Bakersfield-Madera using the San Joaquin at the N and S ends of the system to reach Stockton/Oakland and LA, for one example).
There is a State Rail plan in process, as well as significant improvements to the major regional railways (ie. Caltrain, Metrolink) that again allow some piggybacking.
Essentially, the Authority has enough cash on hand to build the IOS and to --
potentially, although most indications are that they should be able to -- get to San Jose.
In the meantime, they can actually begin generating revenue (and profit) and tapping into that to access financing to continue construction and expansion.
This is virtually the method by which all of these types of networks are rolled out -- whether by private financing or public funding.
Somehow, when All Aboard does it, it's some miraculous thing. When CAHSRA does it, it's foolish