HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:29 AM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notyrview View Post
Whoa really? It looks so cool in videos. Is the coloring to intense?

I guess i could see a problem where 30 years from now too many towers
all have the same spectacle. Then it would just turn into light pollution. But a couple LED boards spread out would look good.
Yeah, after I saw the video of the SF building in San Francisco, I was on board.
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:43 AM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
Well... these complaints wouldn't really apply to this building in this city. It won't be the tallest, and I'd argue we need a little more flash in that part of the skyline. The roof of 311 S Wacker is very bright and that isn't a bad thing
Yeah i'm all for a little razzle dazzle here that can be used to celebrate all sorts of holidays and events.
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:56 AM
OhioGuy OhioGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by kolchak View Post
I've recently seen the SF tower in person and the top while not a cheap video screen is still gaudy.
I’ve been in SF twice this year and don’t find the building, including its top, gaudy at all. Just a matter of personal taste whether one takes issue with the aesthetic appearance of the building. I quite like it.
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:13 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by kolchak View Post
Its already the tallest building in the city - with the crown as a display it removes it even further from the rest of the skyline which is way darker and it just sticks out too much. Esp when seen coming in via the Bay Bridge.
While WPS will be tall, it won't dominate the skylike like SF Tower in San Francisco does. Chicago's skyline has too many peaks and is simply much larger and beefier. If anything, WPS's LED crown would bookend the north end of the Loop proper skyline, with the bright white 311 S Wacker crown holding down the southern end. It would fit in pretty well, IMHO.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Notyrview View Post
Yeah i'm all for a little razzle dazzle here that can be used to celebrate all sorts of holidays and events.
The fact that this building will be at the confluence of the river, making it even more visible from street level, is definitely a plus that the developers no doubt should consider taking advantage of.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
     
     
  #685  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:19 AM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
The fact that this building will be at the confluence of the river, making it even more visible from street level, is definitely a plus that the developers no doubt should consider taking advantage of.
I just hope it happens
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 3:00 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notyrview View Post
Yeah i'm all for a little razzle dazzle here that can be used to celebrate all sorts of holidays and events.
Exactly, it's okay to have a little flair and pizzazz from time to time
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 6:40 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
I still can't believe the Salesforce news on this. I doubt Rahm will give a rats ass about granting them everything they want since he's not running for reelection.
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 7:02 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
I still can't believe the Salesforce news on this. I doubt Rahm will give a rats ass about granting them everything they want since he's not running for reelection.
Man i hope not. The city has the upper hand here.

Also, don't count your chickens just yet on these jobs. The EDGE program is deeply flawed, mostly because the oversight is so weak. Indeed, there's are no regular evaluations to make sure companies keep their promises. Thankfully, the Tribune did a big study on this to show how the program is really fleecing taxpayers.

"In the first comprehensive analysis of 783 EDGE agreements, the Chicago Tribune found that two of every three businesses that completed the incentive program failed to maintain the number of employees they agreed to retain or hire.

State officials can't say how many jobs have been created through the job program; nor can they say how many jobs EDGE companies have eliminated. The Tribune, however, found that 79 current or former EDGE recipients have reported eliminating 23,369 jobs through layoffs and closures since entering the program.

...

But the Tribune's analysis suggests that tax credits often do little to help companies expand or create sustainable jobs. A pattern of deals emerges in which businesses lobbied for maximum rewards and minimum requirements — and the state said yes."
     
     
  #689  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 5:13 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
^^^ I agree with you on the first part, the city has the upper hand here. However, these jobs are not happening because of some tax credit whether SF gets one or not. SF is growing rapidly and needs to find more sources of labor and San Fran just can't accommodate all these FAANGS businesses at once. As our resident city bookie pointed out to me in a PM, Salesforce's cloud revenue has nearly doubled since 2015. I'm not at all worried about whether these jobs will materialize if Salesforce signs a lease here.
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 5:38 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
^^^ I agree with you on the first part, the city has the upper hand here. However, these jobs are not happening because of some tax credit whether SF gets one or not. SF is growing rapidly and needs to find more sources of labor and San Fran just can't accommodate all these FAANGS businesses at once. As our resident city bookie pointed out to me in a PM, Salesforce's cloud revenue has nearly doubled since 2015. I'm not at all worried about whether these jobs will materialize if Salesforce signs a lease here.
You're right that Salesforce will probably keep growing. I just don't trust companies to police themselves. They might decide to move a thousand jobs to Atlanta at some point. You never know how their needs could change. If EDGE had some real teeth and accountability, I would be more supportive of tax abatements.
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 6:25 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notyrview View Post
You're right that Salesforce will probably keep growing. I just don't trust companies to police themselves. They might decide to move a thousand jobs to Atlanta at some point. You never know how their needs could change. If EDGE had some real teeth and accountability, I would be more supportive of tax abatements.
^ Well, this wouldn't be EDGE, it would be property tax relief.

If I were Mayor of Chicago, and I would be a kick ass one, I would put it in clear writing that every year a headcount of actively salaried local SF staff needs to be provided prior to issuing a property tax break. Or, it can be on a per capita basis.

Not enough headcount? Tax bill goes up.

After all, what the hell do we employ all those loafers at the offices of the Cook County Treasurer & Assessor (2 different offices! ) for? They obviously don't answer the phone when you call, so give them some work to do
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 7:07 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Well, this wouldn't be EDGE, it would be property tax relief.
Eh, pretty sure EDGE is big component per someone else's comment and per that article.

Sounds like the only loafers here are you and me on this forum all day when we should be working.
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 7:21 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notyrview View Post
Eh, pretty sure EDGE is big component per someone else's comment and per that article.

Sounds like the only loafers here are you and me on this forum all day when we should be working.
EDGE is a State tax relief program (income tax relief?), whereas property taxes are local. I'm no expert but that was my understanding.

And yes, we're both loafers... believe it or not I'm at work (and even busy) as I post this
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2018, 7:32 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
EDGE is a State tax relief program (income tax relief?), whereas property taxes are local. I'm no expert but that was my understanding.

And yes, we're both loafers... believe it or not I'm at work (and even busy) as I post this
Same, i'm fielding all sorts of Slack conversations and worried i'm going to type something about skyscrapers...

Ardecilia is the expert on this tax stuff i believe, but you might be right.
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2018, 8:25 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Just in, looks like Rahm is doing what needs to be done to bring Salesforce to Wolf Point South:

Emanuel dangles a signage deal to seal Salesforce tower and its 5,000 new jobs

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/greg-...-5000-new-jobs
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2018, 8:36 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 934
The article referred to the video board in question as "plaza level". If that's accurate we can say goodbye to the LED crown video board.
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2018, 10:24 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Nice!
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2018, 11:17 PM
RedCorsair87 RedCorsair87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 519
The Crains article has been update. The screen will now be inside the building and a deal is in the process of being signed.
     
     
  #699  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2018, 11:17 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
An interesting paragraph from the article:
“In another tweak, signage rights would be provided not just to companies that occupy at least 51 percent of a building’s leasable space as in current law but to those that lease at least 350,000 sq. ft of space in a building or employ more than 1,000 employees there. Officials say the current threshold is largely unattainable for tenants of the city’s largest office towers, some of which have more than 1 million square feet of leasable space.”

Never knew what the regulations were. I’m always proud to see building signage; n indication to me that the city is flourishing economically.

Though I will always resent Motorola for replacing “Stanta Fe”.
     
     
  #700  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2018, 12:04 AM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,440
Trib is saying "likely to be about 800 feet (about 60 stories) tall."

BOOOOOO!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.