HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #51961  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2023, 12:55 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibba View Post
I'm on the "for" side of this as well. It probably is gimmicky, but there's something about the dynamic of vertically proportioned windows against a horizontally proportioned building mass that feels good to me. And the fenestration pattern feels dynamic too (which is a trend but one that I don't mind having around).

Same here. Like the rythym on this one.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51962  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2023, 5:40 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibba View Post
In that sense I agree, definitely. For North/Clybourn specifically, I wouldn't feel inclined to stroll through my neighborhood, being surrounded by strip centers, the highway, the river, and vacant CHA land and all.

It would be great if they could humanize the N-S ped. crossings over North Ave. in that area; it would help connect it to the typical urban area of Lincoln Park to the north. I believe North Ave itself can't be touched as it's an evacuation route; maybe close the portion of Clybourn that spans Halsted to North?
As mentioned above, the riverfront/Wild Mile is probably the best chance to improve walkability in this area. But it's already pretty walkable (in the WalkScore sense) despite the heavy traffic. If you live here, there is the city's largest Whole Foods, various good bars/restaurants, and any category killer retail you want, all within a 5 minute walk. Then there is a 24-hour subway station to take you anywhere else. The convenience is hard to match anywhere in the city except maybe River North.

North Avenue itself is unpleasant with narrow sidewalks, but there is a signalized intersection at every block and the side streets are not bad at all.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51963  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2023, 6:36 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
As mentioned above, the riverfront/Wild Mile is probably the best chance to improve walkability in this area. But it's already pretty walkable (in the WalkScore sense) despite the heavy traffic. If you live here, there is the city's largest Whole Foods, various good bars/restaurants, and any category killer retail you want, all within a 5 minute walk. Then there is a 24-hour subway station to take you anywhere else. The convenience is hard to match anywhere in the city except maybe River North.

North Avenue itself is unpleasant with narrow sidewalks, but there is a signalized intersection at every block and the side streets are not bad at all.
It’s great on paper, to be sure. It’s just a completely uninviting place to walk around, to me. Feels downright hostile to walking, really.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51964  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2023, 8:23 PM
dewbs dewbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibba View Post
It’s great on paper, to be sure. It’s just a completely uninviting place to walk around, to me. Feels downright hostile to walking, really.
But also simultaneously hostile to driving. Just a very weird warren back there. Also to me feels very disconnected from the parts of lincoln park to the north. The river blocks it to the west, the east side of clybourn is a complete wall (and new shitty doesn't help), and to the south you run into a completely dead stretch of division.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51965  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 2:26 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibba View Post
It’s great on paper, to be sure. It’s just a completely uninviting place to walk around, to me. Feels downright hostile to walking, really.
I think regular folks won't care so much. With a complete network of sidewalks, a heavy concentration of businesses and residences, and frequent crosswalks and a 24-hour subway, this is already more walkable than 99.9% of this country.

Also, things are getting better. The site plan for Big Deahl is pretty great. Instead of big podiums that fill the lot to max out the parking, they did skinnier buildings and are building a pocket park between them that should allow all kinds of quick little shortcuts through the block - if they don't keep the fences locked. Really a nice piece of urbanism. Reminds me of Northern Liberties in Philly on a small scale. Of course it could turn out shitty like Wicker Park Connection...
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51966  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 3:54 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
A new 4 story, 156,000 sq ft retail building with a 168 parking spot garage was permitted for Canal St between 17th and 18th St. This is made up of various people from the Chinese community such as one of the owners of MingHin. This development is across the river from Chinatown, and basically across the street from the Oriental Wholesale Market and another retail Chinese grocery store. The development was passed by city council in April 2020 in the early days of COVID. I thought this was dead in the water, but voila - permit issued yesterday.

The land has been most recently used as a storage yard for semi trailers. For awhile before that it was vacant and has been vacant for at least 15 years. The project has been written back as far as 2015 in Crains when they talked about wanting to make a 40,000 sq ft grocery store ("Whole Foods, but Asian"). And then they submitted another zoning application to up that nearly 4X in 2020, which was approved. Vari was the architect back then. Looks like the main entrance would actually be on the corner of 17th and Canal.

Streetview: https://www.google.com/maps/place/17...!4d-87.6389546

__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51967  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:02 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
So weird - this site was in the news just days ago as a site that activists were pushing for the new Near South high school. https://blockclubchicago.org/2023/02...e-high-school/

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that progressive activists can't do basic due diligence on a property, but Alderman Sigcho was at the press conference! It's in his ward and the zoning change passed on his watch! This is the second time now that I've noticed Sigcho be seemingly ignorant of major developments in his own ward (although under the new map this will move to the 11th Ward). I guess I can't complain if developers keep finding ways to slip it past the goalie...
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51968  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:07 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
So weird - this site was in the news just days ago as a site that activists were pushing for the new Near South high school. https://blockclubchicago.org/2023/02...e-high-school/

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that progressive activists can't do basic due diligence on a property, but Alderman Sigcho was at the press conference! It's in his ward and the zoning change passed on his watch! This is the second time now that I've noticed Sigcho be seemingly ignorant of development in his own ward (although under the new map this will move to the 11th Ward). I guess I can't complain if developers keep finding ways to slip it past the goalie...
That's what I thought too and had the same thoughts as you. The one with the retail plaza that was just permitted has been owned by this venture since 2015. But apparently the site these activists want is north of 17th st and closer to the train tracks. Not the same land. The retail plaza will go into the parcel between 18th, Stewart, 17th, and Canal, which is south of 17th.

__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51969  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:13 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
That means the error was on the part of Block Club reporter. But that small site is even weirder.

I believe that site was being reserved for the Streets and San to relocate their yard from 18th/Clark. How do you fit a high school on such a tiny little site? Even Jones HS has a much bigger site, and that is a very vertical high school. Why would anyone think that's a feasible site? I guess the HS could go on the old Streets & San site at 18th/Clark, that is a bit bigger.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51970  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:20 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
That means the error was on the part of Block Club reporter. But that small site is even weirder.

I believe that site was being reserved for the Streets and San to relocate their yard from 18th/Clark. How do you fit a high school on such a tiny little site? Even Jones HS has a much bigger site, and that is a very vertical high school. Why would anyone think that's a feasible site? I guess the HS could go on the old Streets & San site at 18th/Clark, that is a bit bigger.
It's a really weird site, and I'd think that chances of it happening there are slim to none. Pretty sure if it happens, it'll be on the South Loop site at 24th & State, near Chinatown.


By the way, this retail plaza will be just over triple the size of the newer retail Plaza at Canal & Archer (Canal Plaza).
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51971  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:08 PM
urbanpln urbanpln is offline
urbanpln
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
It's a really weird site, and I'd think that chances of it happening there are slim to none. Pretty sure if it happens, it'll be on the South Loop site at 24th & State, near Chinatown.
I'm hoping it does not go there. I worked on the RFP with the CHA about 8 years ago. The plan we selected was a dense (nearly 900 units) walkable development that creates a nice street wall from Cermak to 24th Place. Located the school there would take away much need population in that area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51972  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:29 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
So weird - this site was in the news just days ago as a site that activists were pushing for the new Near South high school.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that progressive activists can't do basic due diligence on a property
just wait until we have a 21 PERSON ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD that oversees CPS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51973  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:36 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 977
Why not build it here and cluster it with the new South Loop elementary building?

https://therealdeal.com/chicago/2018...ng-south-loop/

EDIT: Nevermind, assuming they've already sold it...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51974  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 4:52 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
It's a really weird site, and I'd think that chances of it happening there are slim to none. Pretty sure if it happens, it'll be on the South Loop site at 24th & State, near Chinatown.


By the way, this retail plaza will be just over triple the size of the newer retail Plaza at Canal & Archer (Canal Plaza).
Public transit access from the rest of its catchment area would also be terrible.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51975  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 6:13 PM
SteelMonkey SteelMonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 344
Not sure if this has been posted prior -

https://www.chicagotribune.com/busin...fde-story.html


A group founded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg and his wife will spend $250 million to create a new biomedical research hub in Chicago where scientists from Northwestern University, University of Chicago and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign will study human disease.

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, named for Zuckerberg and his wife, Dr. Priscilla Chan, plans to invest $250 million in the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Chicago over a decade. Gov. J.B. Pritzker has also committed $25 million in state dollars to support the project.

Biohub leaders are still in the process of finding a location, which will include laboratories, meeting spaces and special instrumentation and equipment.

Northwestern, UChicago and UIUC beat out proposals from about 60 other teams across the country to win the funding.

The hub will be the second of its kind in the country. The first CZ Biohub was founded in San Francisco in 2016 in collaboration with Stanford University; University of California, Berkeley; and University of California, San Francisco.

article continues
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51976  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2023, 8:08 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
^ It's being discussed in the Economic Development thread: https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...25033&page=245
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51977  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2023, 2:19 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 977
The LaSalle Street Reimagined meeting was last night, and all of the proposals seemed promising to me. Here's some info on 30 N. LaSalle:

https://chicago.urbanize.city/post/l...d-30-n-lasalle
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51978  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2023, 11:55 PM
mh777 mh777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 161
Rogers Park Holdings is proposing a new 9-story residential building at 135 N. Des Plaines. Will go in front of ZBA on March 17th.





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51979  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2023, 2:37 AM
joemits joemits is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 52
Rafael Vinoly passed away at 78 from an aneurysm. Nema was one of my favorites in the last few year. Rip.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51980  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2023, 4:15 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
I'm glad to finally see a proposal at 135 N Desplaines, but why does it have to be one of these condo boxes? It's not ugly per se, but the ground floor will be more blank wall shit with parking behind. Such a disappointment when you've got vibrant restaurants Avec and Blackbird right next door.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.