HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2121  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2023, 3:36 AM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Can confirm.

Quote:
Passengers Rank SFO the Best Airport in North America
Airports Council International announces winners of annual Airport Service Quality survey

SAN FRANCISCO – March 6, 2023 – Airports Council International (ACI), the foremost advocate for airport operators around the world, today named SFO the Best Airport in North America in their 2022 Awards for Airport Service Quality (ASQ) Awards, recognizing the best airports for customer experience as selected by passengers. SFO achieved this award in the category covering North American airports serving over 40 million annual passengers. Dallas-Fort Worth airport was also honored in this category.

“San Francisco is a world-class destination that welcomes millions of visitors from around the world every year, and this award speaks to the highest quality of service and experience offered at SFO,” said Mayor London Breed. “Creating a welcoming environment for San Franciscans, the Bay Area, and travelers from around the world is vital to our economic recovery, and our airport has truly made a lasting, positive impression with customers. I want to thank everyone at SFO, especially the dedicated frontline workers, for this major accomplishment.”

“We are truly honored to be ranked by passengers as the top airport in North America in the ACI Airport Service Quality program,” said Airport Director Ivar C. Satero. “Combined with our ranking as the top U.S. airport by the readers of the Wall Street Journal, this latest award validates the hard work our team has put forth to create the world-class airport experience our customers truly appreciate and deserve.”

In November 2022, the Wall Street Journal named SFO as the top large U.S. airport in their annual ranking, comprised of multiple different measurements, including on-time performance, security checkpoint line waits and customer satisfaction scores from J.D. Power. SFO is now the first airport to receive top ranking by both the Wall Street Journal and ASQ in the same calendar year.

The ASQ program is the world’s leading airport customer service experience measurement and benchmarking program. Compared to other programs in the aviation industry, it is based on live research via surveys gathered at the airport – direct from passengers – rating their satisfaction on the day of travel.

The surveys cover over 30 performance indicators across key elements of the passenger’s airport experience, including signage and wayfinding, check-in, and shopping and dining. This provides the most complete picture of the passenger experience at each airport and provides global benchmarks for the industry. Last year, more than half of the world's travelers passed through an ASQ airport, and over 465,000 surveys were collected.
https://www.flysfo.com/media/press-r...-north-america
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2122  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2023, 10:12 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Orange fins are going away. The end of an era.

Quote:
03.23.23
New fare gates to be installed systemwide to enhance safety and improve access


BART is moving forward with a historic purchase of brand-new fare gates to be installed systemwide as part of its latest effort to win riders back and overhaul safety in the system. The new fare gates will bring a new look and improved experience, offering state-of-the-art technology that will boost safety by reducing fare evasion, enhancing access for people in wheelchairs and those who bring bikes and strollers on BART, and optimizing the reliability and maintenance needs of the fare gates.

At the March 23, 2023, BART Board of Directors meeting, staff recommended the Board move forward with the first purchase of the $90 million Next Generation Fare Gate project. Staff recommended awarding up to $47 million to STraffic America to implement the project. BART staff will develop an installation timeline with STraffic and will stress-test the new fare gate design at a yet-to-be-determined station later this year. The project calls for all stations to have new fare gates by 2026.

The new fare gates will look unlike any other of the current 700 fare gates in the BART system. While the new design has not yet been finalized, the gates will have clear swing barriers that will be very difficult to be pushed through, jumped over, or maneuvered under.

The next generation fare gates will not have the orange fins riders have become accustomed to. They will also be different than the new swing-style fare gates designed by BART staff and recently installed to enclose elevators into the paid area.

The new gates will be able to handle large crowds without slowing people down as they move in and out of stations while processing their Clipper cards. The gates will have advanced 3D sensors that are able to detect if someone is in a wheelchair or has a bike, stroller, or luggage with them, allowing for more time before the swing barrier closes. The gates will have LED lighting on the swing barriers and the pathway through the gate to help visually impaired riders. STraffic has worked extensively with members of the ADA community and is committed to continue this work while designing the BART gates.

“New fare gates will transform the rider experience and will deliver immediate improvements to safety and reliability,” said BART Board President Janice Li. “BART researched world-wide best practices in fare gate designs to help guide this pivotal purchase. I want to thank the local, state, and federal funding sources who have stepped up to support this impactful project. I am committed to seeing this project fully funded and fully implemented without delay.”
https://www.bart.gov/news/articles/2023/news20230323
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2123  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2023, 11:31 AM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,681
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2124  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2023, 4:06 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
Transit agency sues property owner, tenants to seize San Jose sites near downtown BART stop
VTA moves to gain ownership of properties for San Jose BART project

By GEORGE AVALOS | gavalos@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: April 3, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

SAN JOSE — The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority has moved to officially seize ownership of key sites in downtown San Jose it says are needed to construct and operate a future BART station there.

The transit agency is using a lawsuit and eminent domain proceeding to grab control of parcels on E. Santa Clara Street not far from city hall. An existing building would have to be bulldozed and merchants displaced ahead of the development of an underground BART stop under Santa Clara Street, papers filed with the Santa Clara County Superior Court show.

A building currently serving retail, restaurant and residential purposes with addresses of 91 and 97 E. Santa Clara St. is the primary site the VTA is attempting to seize, according to the court records.

The lawsuit the VTA filed names several defendants: Property owner Goldrock Holdings and building tenants Mexico Bakery, 3rd and Bourbon restaurant and Enso Nightclub and Bar.

Miriam Jalil, a principal executive with Goldrock Holdings, said she was dismayed by the VTA’s actions and was caught unaware that the transit agency had formally lodged an eminent domain lawsuit against the ownership group and merchants.

“They continue to pursue to condemn and destroy a legacy building that houses many long-term and small minority-owned businesses and tenants,” Jalil said of the VTA’s actions in connection with the 91 and 97 East Santa Clara St. building.

...

The property sought to be acquired in this action is necessary in order to construct, operate and maintain the east ventilation and emergency access facilities for the Downtown San Jose station,” the VTA claims in the lawsuit.

But some of the tenants in the property said they believe that the emergency access and ventilation components could be built on the adjacent courtyard behind their sites.

“I have committed decades of my life to building and supporting this minority-owned business in this location in downtown San Jose,” Freddie Jackson, owner of the Enso nightclub, wrote in a letter to the VTA. “If VTA moves its emergency exit just a bit into the courtyard lot, we can save the entire building full of tenants.”

VTA officials, however, counter that moving the location of the emergency access and ventilation facilities for the BART station would require a brand-new environmental review that would add potentially one to two years to a project that’s already been considerably delayed.

The additional cost could be $200 million, Ron Golem, VTA’s director of real estate and transit-oriented development, had estimated previously.
https://www.siliconvalley.com/2023/0...develop-build/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2125  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2023, 4:12 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
San Francisco Bay Ferry hits post-covid ridership milestone
By James Salazar | Examiner staff writer Apr 10, 2023

As transit agencies continue trying to recoup their ridership, the month of April has been smooth sailing for one public transportation service.

Preliminary data released by the San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA) on Monday morning revealed that the San Francisco Bay Ferry experienced its biggest weekend ridership since Fleet Week 2022, when ferries carried more than 26,000 riders across the bay in the name of naval festivities.

According to Thomas Hall, WETA's public information and marketing manager, 10,435 riders used the SF Bay Ferry's transbay service this past weekend. This is the agency's biggest figure for a weekend this year, just edging Presidents Day weekend service.

Hall noted that this number didn't include the "hundreds more riders" who used the Ballpark Short Hop routes, which carry passengers from downtown San Francisco to Oracle Park, or the Pier 41 Short Hop routes, which take passengers from downtown San Francisco to Pier 41.

WETA's ferries averaged approximately 7,000 riders through the first work week of the month. This figure is 69% of average daily ridership from April 2019.

"There are seasonal effects on ferry ridership, so we often compare months," said Hall. "April 2019 was our last 'normal' April and 2019 was our busiest year across the whole ferry system."

More boons could be coming to ferry ridership, such as afternoon San Francisco Giants home games. The team's April 7 home opener against the Kansas City Royals boosted ridership by 20% compared to recent Fridays.

Additionally, weekend ridership was up roughly 25% over similar recent weekends. However Hall noted that "the weather was obviously a big positive factor."
https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/tran...056bc596a.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2126  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2023, 9:04 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
This is what BART’s new fare gates will look like. Can they put an end to fare evasion?
Ricardo Cano
April 13, 2023



Many riders have called for this moment, while others remain skeptical, but almost everyone hopes it leads to a better riding experience: BART is finally replacing its fare gates.

The Bay Area’s regional rail system for years has grappled with endemic fare evasion that riders and some officials say has exacerbated quality-of-life issues such as crime and homelessness on BART.

On Thursday, the agency’s Board of Directors awarded a $90 million contract to STraffic America to replace the rail system’s 700 or so fare gates.

...

What will the new fare gates look like?

The new hardened gates will look unlike any of the gates the agency is using.

A conceptual rendering shows fare gates with tall, clear swing barriers with a steel-like frame that adds more height. There would be two narrow gaps at the bottom and above between the gate’s swing barrier and frame, but the rendering depicts a gate that would make it highly difficult to jump over and nearly impossible to crawl under.

The rendering shows the top of the gates’ frames could be equipped with bird-repellant spikes meant to deter pigeons at outside stations and, presumably, fare evaders.

The agency in a news release said the gates “will be very difficult to be pushed through, jumped over, or maneuvered under.” While BART staff acknowledged that the gates won’t prevent “piggybacking,” the gates will be equipped with sensors and alarms that can detect and sound off when more than one person tries to pass through the gate. The alarms can also go off when someone tries to jump over the gates.

BART spokesperson Chris Filippi said STraffic America will create a “BART-specific design” after the agency’s board awards the contract. The design, he said, will be based on 70 pages of technical specifications that BART laid out to vendors — including a requirement that the gates be at least 6 feet tall.

The new gates will be equipped with sensors and cameras that will allow BART to track fare evasion in real time. They will be made of material that “can withstand patron abuse” and requires minimal maintenance costs, Filippi said.

When will all BART fare gates be replaced?

Officials say they plan to replace fare gates across BART’s 50 stations by 2026.

West Oakland Station will be the first station to get new gates, which are expected to be installed by November.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/...photo-23675868
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2127  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2023, 9:17 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
As SF Schools Fuel Muni’s Rebound, Students Want to Speed Up Their Favorite Bus Route
The 29 Sunset rumbles past more than two dozen schools. But making it ‘rapid’ will require money only voters can provide.

Last week, city transit officials offered yet another indicator of an ailing San Francisco. On the Muni routes that move people to the downtown core, ridership remains low.

But for routes that don’t rely on downtown commuters, there was a different story altogether. Buses are full, or nearly so. Routes like the 14R Mission and 22 Fillmore are back to at least 90 percent of 2019 ridership, and others like the 9 San Bruno and 49 Van Ness/Mission have surpassed pre-pandemic levels.

The 10 routes with the highest recovery all have something in common: They take students to school.

As Muni faces dire budget shortfalls — and the prospect of quiet downtown rides for the long-term future — the agency is considering big changes to the so-called “neighborhood” routes, and how they can serve their riders better. But students are not waiting for the agency to act; they want a say.

Of all the lines serving the city’s schools, the 29 Sunset hasn’t rebounded quite as much; it’s at 70 percent of pre-COVID ridership. Its lack of speed and reliability is keeping ridership down, transit officials say, and they have pledged to make changes.

Along its nearly 14-mile L-shaped journey, the bus rumbles within shouting — or at least walking — distance of more than two dozen elementary, middle, and high schools, plus SF State and City College.

It can take a while to get somewhere on the 29 Sunset. Average wait for a bus is nine minutes, but packed buses might bypass a stop. En route, many factors slow each trip. For example, on the southern stretch, the bus navigates several narrow, winding streets; on the west side, it stops at every block along Sunset Blvd., an alphabetical snail’s pace. Just the western half of the route can take up to 100 minutes round trip, according to Muni project manager Steve Boland, who is in charge of the 29 Sunset changes.

The 29 Sunset is chockablock throughout the day, with student riders trying to make their first period bell between 8 and 9:30 am, then piling on again when schools let out in the afternoon.

This combination of route length and serving many schools contributes to longer wait times at the bus stop, reports Hayden Miller, a Lowell High School junior, public transit aficionado, and regular 29 rider. “Even with the bus running every nine minutes, each one is just packed, and then bus after bus passes already full,” he tells The Frisc.



Lowell students have been leading the charge for 29 Sunset improvements for more than five years. SFMTA, the agency that runs Muni, has added “school trippers” — more buses during peak school hours — but the bus route needs other changes, say students, including rapid service similar to the Geary, Van Ness, and Mission corridors. (The Frisc reached out to students and representatives of other schools along the route, including Balboa High, June Jordan School for Equity, and City College, but has not received replies yet.)

There was momentum before the pandemic, with a a social media campaign to gather rider experiences via photos and posts sent to #FixOur29. But COVID hit, schools closed, and Muni service was cut.

Now that students are a big part of Muni’s recovery, transit planners have returned to the 29 Sunset improvement project, and street-level adjustments could come this year. But an overhaul, similar to the “rapid” lines elsewhere in the city, could run into a fiscal wall.

...

For now, planners can speed up the bus with changes around the margins that could cut travel time on the western half of the route by 15 percent, said Boland.

They include sidewalk bulb-outs along Sunset Blvd. and Lincoln Way to let buses stop without having to pull back out into traffic. Another subtle change: moving stops to the far side of intersections with traffic signals, so that buses can make the light before picking up passengers.

...

Before any improvements happen, SFMTA will conduct more outreach, including among seniors and persons with disabilities. A proposal for a first phase of improvements focused on the west side is slated to go before the full SFMTA board around Memorial Day, according to Boland.

While the southern part of the route runs through several lower-income neighborhoods, which Muni has pledged to prioritize for better service, the western route will see changes first because the agency wants to coordinate with a big repaving project along Sunset, said Borland.

In the meantime, everyone — students, seniors, and everyone in between — will just have to wait.
https://thefrisc.com/as-sf-schools-f...e-8e641e3fde03
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2128  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2023, 3:58 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
We could definitely use more of this.

Quote:
Major Berkeley streets could get bus lanes in coming years
City officials are taking early steps toward building transit lanes along University, Telegraph and Shattuck avenues — though the plans are a long way from reality.



By Nico Savidge
April 14, 2023, 4:40 p.m.

Some of Berkeley’s busiest streets could one day have bus lanes.

City officials have started working to develop a proposal to prohibit cars from one lane in each direction of University Avenue and a portion of Shattuck Avenue, in an effort to speed up service along several popular AC Transit routes.

And after the City Council voted last year to create a bus lane on the four blocks at the north end of Telegraph Avenue, planners are now considering transit-only lanes along the rest of the corridor, from Dwight Way to the Oakland border. Both projects could also include new bike lanes.

The concepts are a long way from becoming a reality, however.

Councilmember Terry Taplin described the current state of his vision for University and Shattuck avenues as a “plan to make a process to make a plan.” The proposal for Telegraph Avenue is slightly further along in the planning process, but work is stalled because of a staffing shortage in Berkeley’s Transportation Division that is affecting projects throughout the city.

Still, to Taplin and Councilmember Rigel Robinson — who have embraced efforts to redistribute space on city streets away from cars and toward public transit, pedestrians and bicyclists — these are enticing early steps for projects they say will improve transportation options and help reduce carbon emissions.

“I think it’s time for Berkeley to boldly go where some cities have gone 10 years ago,” Taplin said. Referring to the city’s pledge to eliminate fatal and severe traffic crashes, he added, “The clock’s ticking on climate change, the clock’s ticking on Vision Zero — [we] might as well start now.”

There are no detailed designs for either idea, nor any cost estimates. Even under proponents’ most optimistic assumptions it’s likely to be several years before the lanes would go into effect, and getting to that point would almost certainly require overcoming resistance from drivers, which has doomed similar bus lane plans.



...

The Telegraph proposal echoes an idea Berkeley rejected more than a decade ago to create a regional bus rapid transit system along the avenue, in which high-capacity buses would cruise past traffic in dedicated lanes that stretched from UC Berkeley to downtown Oakland, then on to San Leandro via International Boulevard. AC Transit opened a shortened version of that system, called Tempo, in 2020.

Robinson acknowledged the vision for dedicated lanes on Telegraph would not revive the bus rapid transit vision Berkeley turned down; in the years since then, Oakland has redesigned portions of the avenue to reduce it to a single traffic lane in each direction.



“An opportunity like that doesn’t come around again,” Robinson said. “But improving transit connectivity between Berkeley and Oakland is as important today, if not more so, as it was then.”

Taplin’s proposal calls for working with AC Transit to consider building elements of a bus rapid transit system along what is now the route of line 51B on University and Shattuck avenues, such as elevated boarding platforms and technology that makes buses a priority for green lights. Even if AC Transit doesn’t roll out a full bus rapid transit system, he said, those improvements are worth making.
https://www.berkeleyside.org/2023/04...rsity-shattuck
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2129  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2023, 5:57 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
Robot shuttles at San Jose airport? Major transit plan moves forward
Driverless pods would connect airport and Diridon Station at a cost of up to $500 million



By GABRIEL GRESCHLER | ggreschler@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: April 18, 2023 at 6:07 p.m.

An effort to connect a 3.5-mile gap between San Jose Mineta International Airport and Diridon Station may get a Star Trek-like solution.

Despite skepticism from transit enthusiasts and the local bus unions, San Jose councilmembers on Tuesday gave their initial approval on what could ultimately become an army of robotic shuttles ferrying passengers between the two travel hubs at a cost of up to $500 million. The project, which could get underway by 2028, comes as the city’s airport and Diridon Station experience increased demand but no efficient public transit option to link them. It currently takes two buses or an Uber to make the journey.

In its unanimous approval on Tuesday, the council voted to explore working with a local startup called Glydways, whose driverless shuttles would carry up to four passengers on a designated driveway at a maximum speed of 31 miles per hour. Since the shuttle would run at a continuous speed, officials from Glydways said the journey could take around eight minutes — as opposed to the roughly half-hour bus ride.

The roughly 200 shuttles would stop at Terminal B — and plans are in the works to potentially include Terminal A and nearby parking. Funding for the project would be a public-private model, with the city taking on some of the costs while an investor would front another portion. The fare cost is currently unknown, city officials said.

...

Glydways, which is based out of South San Francisco, is still in the research and development phase of its technology — and San Jose could end up being its first real-world deployment. The company is also in talks with Pittsburgh, Antioch, Brentwood and Oakley up in Contra Costa County to utilize their shuttles. Founder Mark Seeger said their automation is a lot more simple to deploy compared to Tesla’s driverless cars, since the Glydways shuttles aren’t dealing with all the variables on a public road.

The use of Glydways shuttles drew criticism from transit fanatics like Jake Wilde, a student at San Jose State University. Wilde said that while the automated shuttles may be useful between short distances, they may not be scalable like rail or bus. Others, like those at Valley Transportation Authority’s union, accused the council of banking on a technology that isn’t commercially available yet.

“This project seems very unrealistic,” said Amalgamated Transit Union Local 265’s member Raj Singh. “And may not be feasible.”

But city officials said the shuttle option is likely the cheapest and most efficient way to connect the airport and Diridon.

Automated tramways, which can be found at San Francisco International Airport, cost around $800 million per mile, according to Brian Stanke, who is overseeing the shuttle project. Though a bus system could get up and running quickly, Stanke argued that traffic between the airport and Diridon makes the option unpredictable — and could lead to more people relying on Uber.

Tuesday’s vote represented the first major progress in the over two-decade debate on how to resolve the downtown transit issue.

An effort to increase transit in the area started back in 2000 when voters passed Measure A. The city started exploring options with VTA on making it easier to travel in and around the airport area. But the effort stalled until 2019, when Mayor Sam Liccardo again asked staff to explore more options.

In 2020, a number of options were put on the table, including an automated bus system that would hold around 20 people and Elon Musk’s tunneling firm The Boring Company that carries passengers with automated Teslas on underground highways.
https://www.siliconvalley.com/2023/0...moves-forward/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2130  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2023, 6:44 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Good idea.

The sites:
https://goo.gl/maps/V6fRZe2XBAvePNZA7
https://goo.gl/maps/enVbvHTievmJMRmw9

Quote:
BART is gearing up to build housing at its Rockridge station
The transit agency held an open house this week to gather input on development at Oakland’s northernmost BART station.
by Natalie Orenstein
April 14, 2023

Hundreds of units of housing are rising around Oakland’s BART stations. Over the past several years, a tower has sprouted at MacArthur, the mid-rise Casa Arabella opened at Fruitvale, and ground was broken on the next piece of that station’s transit village. Apartments also opened (then closed) by the Coliseum, and plans are in the works for West Oakland and Lake Merritt.

So far, the city’s northernmost station, Rockridge, has remained quiet as construction roars on elsewhere. That’s beginning to change.

On Thursday evening, BART held an open house on the station plaza, sharing plans to make Rockridge the next site in its system-wide “transit-oriented development,” a movement in housing policy that emphasizes creating dense, walkable neighborhoods near mass transit like train stations and bus routes.

The event drew a steady stream of commuters coming down the BART escalators and Rockridge residents who showed up with their bikes, dogs, and kids. They reviewed posters with information on the development process and placed sticky notes with their hopes and concerns on them.

“I use this station many times per week, to get to school,” said Rafa Bustos, 17, a Rockridge resident who came by after seeing a flier advertising the open house. Building housing there will “improve the neighborhood and walkability,” he said. “Anything that emphasizes transit would be good, to reduce traffic.”

The Bay Area housing crisis and climate concerns have emboldened BART to build apartments at its stations, with the idea that placing residences right at transit sites reduces reliance on cars and allows for a level of housing density often not found in surrounding neighborhoods. The agency is also facing a fiscal crisis, with ridership nowhere close to where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. Leasing land to developers brings in revenue for BART.

But BART is limited in where it can build at the Rockridge station. Most of the parking lot is owned by Caltrans, the state transportation department, and the placement of the freeway prevents building over most of it. So the agency is looking at developing two relatively small parcels on the west side of College Avenue.



“It’s not a lot of land,” said BART Board Director Rebecca Saltzman, who represents the station and came to Thursday’s event to talk with visitors.

Currently, the parcels in question are used for parking, containing 140 of the 886 total spaces at the station. According to BART, about a third of the parking lot typically sits empty these days, both because of the decrease in ridership and because a majority of Rockridge riders arrive at the station by methods other than driving.

“Housing right next to a BART station is very logical,” said City Councilmember Dan Kalb, whose district includes Rockridge. At the open house, he told The Oaklandside that he supports building enough housing to make the project “worthwhile,” but that he wants to ensure that the buildings are aesthetically pleasing and that at least one-third of the apartments are below-market-rate.

Across all of its developments, BART has a goal of ensuring that 35% of its units qualify as affordable housing, and a requirement of at least 20% affordability at each individual project. Recent projects have been surpassing those marks, achieving around 50% affordability, Saltzman said.

...

The city is in the process of making these changes to its zoning code, including rules that would allow more housing units and taller buildings across Oakland, and relaxing restrictions for affordable housing projects. The proposal would increase the maximum allowable building height at the two parcels slated for Rockridge BART development from 35 feet to 175 feet. (The surrounding areas would not change so significantly.)

“It had a very low height for a BART station,” said city planner Laura Kaminski. “We’re wanting to fix that, and allow for as much housing, and affordable housing, as possible.”

Saltzman said the agency hopes to start searching for a developer by the end of the year. Once the developer is selected, they’ll propose a project for the site, taking input from community members, she said.

“This will move more quickly than any of the past projects, if we stick with the timeline,” she said.
https://oaklandside.org/2023/04/14/b...ridge-station/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2131  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2023, 11:04 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
Major Funding Announcement in VTA's East San Jose to BART Connector
State transportation chief to reveal $46M grant for the planned light rail link from Alum Rock to Eastridge
By Stephen Ellison

The state's transportation chief will be in East San Jose on Monday to make a major funding announcement about the new VTA light rail extension that will connect riders from South and East San Jose with BART.

California State Transportation Secretary Toks Omishakin and local officials are calling the Eastridge to BART Regional Connector a significant milestone. Monday's announcement will specifically address the receipt of a $46 million grant for the Valley Transportation Authority's plan to extend light-rail service from Alum Rock further south to the Eastridge area, according to a release from the office of state Sen. Dave Cortese.

Omishakin, Cortese, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan and Santa Clara County Supervisor Cindy Chavez will be among those delivering remarks at a news conference scheduled for 2 p.m. Monday.

The $530 million Eastridge to BART Regional Connector project will include elevated tracks along the center of Capitol Expressway and an elevated light-rail station at Story Road, according to the plan.

When the project is complete, VTA riders will be able to catch a light-rail train at the Eastridge Station and connect with BART at the Milpitas Station.

Construction is expected to start in the fall.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/loca...-bart/3212817/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2132  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 1:43 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
why... not just a normal people mover? If it's a designated guideway?
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2133  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 2:01 AM
TWAK's Avatar
TWAK TWAK is online now
Resu Deretsiger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lake County, CA
Posts: 15,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
why... not just a normal people mover? If it's a designated guideway?
It would be a great place for another AirBART or BART could make a hard turn and terminate there.
__________________
#RuralUrbanist
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2134  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 2:15 AM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
why... not just a normal people mover? If it's a designated guideway?
Not sure. Definitely a very puzzling move. Maybe it’s supposed to be cheaper?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2135  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 2:57 AM
llamaorama llamaorama is offline
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,210
I expect that most people would not want to share a tiny pod with a stranger unlike a bus or tram with more space. They will for elevators but elevator rides are shorter.

Also these pods will need to be cleaned regularly. I think this is going to be a flaw of robotaxis whenever those come out, they'll need more maintenance than anticipated, and not the mechanical kind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2136  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2023, 3:53 PM
SFBruin SFBruin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,189
^ Yeah, the driver in a traditional taxi provides more than just point A to B.
__________________
Pretend Seattleite.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2137  
Old Posted May 5, 2023, 4:46 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
BART’s 100K pound laser-powered solution to improving rider experience
By Natalia Gurevich | San Francisco Examiner May 4, 2023 Updated 19 hrs ago



Any BART rider is familiar with the quirks of taking the Bay Area’s primary mode of public transit: screeching metal, shaking cars, and delays at the slightest sign of rain.

But that could all be a distant memory if BART’s latest acquisition is as effective as the transit agency promises it to be.

This week, BART announced that it had acquired a “Rail Inspection Vehicle” that uses “hi-tech lasers, sensors, cameras,” among other things, to find problems on the tracks that the agency can then fix without causing disruptions to the schedule.

The 110,000-pound “geometry car” is one of only two of its kind in the country, according to the release. The goal is to ensure riders get a “smoother ride, improving the system’s reliability and cutting costs.”

Using its various capabilities, the railcar assesses the track’s dimensions and wear and tear to find any problems affecting the overall ride – issues like train noise or obstructions on the track.

But the RIV isn’t plodding along inch by inch on the track to do all this. Instead, it conducts its scans going as fast as 70 miles per hour, using 3D surface scans and high-definition images to look for any “abnormalities” with elements that keep the track together.

The track’s concrete ties, fasteners, and overall “position, curvature, smoothness, and alignment” will be under scrutiny.

BART’s new tool was five years in the making in collaboration with Mermec, a rail inspection and diagnostics company. It cost $10 million using federal funds, according to BART spokesperson Jim Allison.

“It will serve as an important asset to BART for the next forty to fifty years,” the agency said in Wednesday’s release.
https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/tran...090eba7a8.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2138  
Old Posted May 5, 2023, 4:48 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
And the video:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2139  
Old Posted May 12, 2023, 9:01 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
A nice overview of Caltrain.

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2140  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 9:18 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,745
Quote:
Bay Area Rapid Transit Has Waifus Now
Say hajimemashite to Baylee, Nimbus, Jasmine, and Mira
By Steve DaSilva
Published 5 hours ago



For years, Americans have gazed longingly at Japan and its plethora of adorable mascot characters. We stared at bird train conductors, food-based moon rabbits, and “a big stone that’s alive,” wondering when we’d get such personalities here in the States. It seems the Bay Area heard our cries, because Bay Area Rapid Transit is now represented by four anime waifus.

The mascots are “inspired by BART frontline employees and BART-contracted animals,” which is about as good a basis for transit mascots as you’ll ever see. Each of the four were designed by separate artists, and all have their own names, personalities, and favorite boba flavors. It’s the Bay Area, after all.
https://jalopnik.com/bay-area-rapid-...now-1850474463
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.