There are a number of pluses to the 4th S. W.Temple tower. First, they've attractively camouflaged the parking structure, which is always a big plus in my book, and that they've put the garage entrances to the back instead of 4th S. is also a plus. Also, as has been pointed out the street engagement on W. Temple is very attractive. For me, I'm also liking these curtain walls that Salt Lake has been turning out lately with the upcoming towers. Let's hope that this tower along with the Hyatt Regency and 99 West is only the beginning for W. Temple. Height and density on W. Temple are long overdue.
That said, Salt Lake has arrived at a point where its downtown towers should be given literally an
'outside the box' design. Even conservatively speaking there is no reason Salt Lake City cannot advance now to towers in the 500' to 550' category, along with some of the kind of curvature that is both understated, yet definitely not a cereal box. I think the Marriott CCH and the Wilshire Grand here in Los Angeles are excellent examples of the type of towers that would fit well and enhance the Salt Lake City skyline. Of course, they're not going to be as tall as here in L.A. at this point, but the designs would still be very attractive. Make them mixed-use, particularly heavy on the luxury rental apartments side in order to justify the additional construction costs. Salt Lake City is still way underserved when it comes to luxury rental apartments. The development explosion of mid-rises if kept up seems to be making inroads into the much needed affordable housing at this point. Leave the overwhelming majority of the affordable mix to the mid-rises. At this point in Salt Lake's journey to notoriety, it wouldn't hurt to continue on with making West Temple an upscale corridor. This new tower on 4th, 99 West Tower, and the Hyatt Regency are already pretty much in that upscale vein.