Posted Aug 19, 2022, 11:36 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 664
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebasketballgeek
Have any of the 14 or so mayoral candidates even so much as discussed urban sprawl? Because our next mayor needs to end new greenfield development so that we can start acting like a major city and build a lot more infill.
|
Of the serious candidates:
Murray:
Quote:
1. A beautiful city in a state of good repair.
By 2040, Winnipeg is a city renowned for its stunning architecture. A beautiful city
known for its urban forest, its state of good repair, and for advancing new green hard
construction materials. There are fewer potholes, and each neighbourhood has
infrastructure performance standards and reporting. To get there, we must model all
infrastructure projects and future developments to ensure they build the net tax
base.
|
Shone:
Quote:
Winnipeg was not designed with you in mind. That is why we need to improve the quality of life in our neighbourhoods by encouraging density and infill development, improving the appearance of our city, making walking, cycling, and public transit more convenient and accessible, and making our downtown more attractive by ensuring residents have access to the amenities they need, such as grocery stores, Liquor Marts, schools, and daycares.
As your mayor, I will work with the provincial and federal governments to create incentives for developers to include green space in their projects, such as parks, community gardens, or vertical farms, support the development of community gardens and urban agriculture projects, such as rooftop gardens, and make amenities more convenient for downtown residents.
|
Gillingham:
Quote:
Allow residential construction as-of-right, with no parking minimums, over existing
commercial sites along Pembina Highway and Portage Avenue. Existing C2 and C3 zoning
rules already allow for up to four stories of commercial construction on these corridors.
Pembina is well served by transit and active transportation routes, while Portage is a major
transit corridor. New mixed-use zoning rules for these corridors would allow for taller
housing construction, as long as these sites maintained a commercial streetfront. If
successful, the strategy would be applied on other major corridors over time.
Allow residential construction over medium and large retail malls, as-of-right, conditional
on setbacks to minimize impacts on nearby residents. These sites already have services,
ample parking and transit connectivity, and residential projects are already taking off as a
trend in other North American cities.
|
Couldn't find anything on the subject from Loney (surprisingly), Ouellette, or Klein. I didn't bother even looking for Motkaluk.
From those with positions, it's a bit circumspect, but that's understandable. No one is going to want to create the impression they're declaring war on the suburbs when that's most of the electorate.
|