HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


125 Greenwich Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #981  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2019, 1:16 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
Completion Expected Next Year For 125 Greenwich Street, In Financial District

Quote:
Work is almost entirely complete on the reflective curtain wall of 125 Greenwich Street, number 14 in our countdown of the tallest projects under construction in New York City. The only sections awaiting façade work are the podium and the portion where the exterior hoist is still mounted. Designed by Rafael Vinoly and developed by Bizzi & Partners and Vector Group, the slender 88-story residential skyscraper stands 912 feet tall over the Financial District. The 273 residential units are being marketed by Douglas Elliman, while the interiors are designed by March & White. Plaza Construction is the general contractor for the development.

Photos from around the neighborhood show the tower from multiple angles and in varying lighting conditions. The blue sky easily reflects off the envelope and blends with the glass skyscrapers of the World Trade Center.

The section of the envelope requiring the most work is the lower floors of the building. Portions of the mixed glass and metal panels can be seen on the northern corner of the Greenwich Street elevation as well as on the profile along Thames Street. This is the only part of the architectural design that significantly contrasts with the geometry and outside appearance of the main superstructure above.

Although 125 Greenwich Street faced financial issues and disputes this past summer regarding two foreclosure proceedings, the project should most likely be completed sometime in 2020.
==========
NYY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #982  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2019, 8:45 AM
Visionist's Avatar
Visionist Visionist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 250
They really should have covered that ugly concrete with marble, or granite, or backlit translucent plastic, or anything.

This tower will always look unfinished.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #983  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2019, 3:08 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840

Credit: FC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #984  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 7:04 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #985  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 5:17 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840

Credit: gigi.nyc
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #986  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2020, 7:30 AM
artspook's Avatar
artspook artspook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: manhattan
Posts: 644
this building isn't much . . it doesn't pretend to be much . .
it's unassuming . . That be given, it's height & proportion are pretty great
. . works well at this location . . pristine rounded glass corners vastly
upgrade this very simple slender concrete box . .
the break midway up in the vertical glass form, also adds interest . .
No matter how much the glass wants to match up & be a part of it,
125 Greenwich is apart from, & doesn't have to live up to, its WTC
neighbors . . not bad . .
__________________
artSpook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #987  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 3:50 AM
UTEPman UTEPman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by artspook View Post
this building isn't much . . it doesn't pretend to be much . .
it's unassuming . . That be given, it's height & proportion are pretty great
. . works well at this location . . pristine rounded glass corners vastly
upgrade this very simple slender concrete box . .
the break midway up in the vertical glass form, also adds interest . .
No matter how much the glass wants to match up & be a part of it,
125 Greenwich is apart from, & doesn't have to live up to, its WTC
neighbors . . not bad . .

Your critiques on buildings mirror almost 100% my own opinions, but this might be a lone exception.

The vertical sidewalks kill anything I would have liked about this building. It's completely distracting, and in complete conflict with the rest of the smooth glassy skin...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #988  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 3:54 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
That's a good way to put it. Vertical sidewalks. Yeah I wonder what they were thinking when they decided to include that element. Because one can imagine the tower is quite alright, like not in a bad way, but adequate if the sidewalks weren't there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #989  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 5:08 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 394
My only issue is of it's color. It looks like it could be part of the WTC complex.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #990  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2020, 5:38 PM
NYer34 NYer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 144
Like a little bit of "The Beekman"/115 Nassau next to the WTC...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #991  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 1:00 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #992  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 2:17 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,780
What a yawner. This was, at one point, 1,300-1,400 ft., and now just an anonymous background tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #993  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2020, 2:07 AM
jayden jayden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 1,493
Well if the design was always going to end up this way, I would rather be this height than 1,300+ feet.

It's not a bad looking building. I think it compliments the WTC well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #994  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2020, 4:46 PM
uaarkson's Avatar
uaarkson uaarkson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Back in Flint
Posts: 2,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
What a yawner. This was, at one point, 1,300-1,400 ft., and now just an anonymous background tower.
With the stupid half-concrete, half-WTC glass facade, I'm glad it didn't end up more prominent. Such an awkward design. It basically looks half finished.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #995  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2020, 9:08 PM
citybooster citybooster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 420
The glassiness and curvature are great... the concrete is inexplicable. I agree it's best that it isn't more prominent because it really is hurt by the jarring clash of look here. There is no justifying the unsightliness of the concrete when it could have been a gorgeous building all around without.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #996  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2020, 3:39 AM
JSsocal JSsocal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 714
Call me crazy.. but I get it, and I like the concrete.. clean and simple, and the concrete's gonna get dirty and rough and contrast all the mirror glass.

Probably would wish they did the mechanical floors differently.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #997  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 4:55 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 394
Maybe adding a more rather elaborate crown could save it in the future?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #998  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2020, 2:54 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840

Credit: Tectonic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #999  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2020, 3:06 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,914
All the talk of residential on the WTC site should cool a bit.


https://therealdeal.com/2020/03/02/f...125-greenwich/

Fortress buys debt on troubled 125 Greenwich
SoftBank-owned investment firm paid $230M for tower’s defaulted mortgage


TRD NEW YORK
Mar. 02, 2020

Quote:
A SoftBank-owned investment firm has purchased the defaulted mortgage on the troubled luxury condo tower 125 Greenwich Street.

Fortress Investment Group bought the mortgage for about $230 million from the investment firm BH3, according to the Wall Street Journal. BH3 had been moving to foreclose on the 88-story project, which is under construction but nearly complete. Fortress will have the right to continue the foreclosure lawsuit if it chooses.
Quote:
The developers — Howard Lorber’s New Valley, Davide Bizzi’s Bizzi & Partners, the Carlton Group and China Cindat — defaulted on the loan as the market for high-end apartments in New York began to weaken. A group of lenders including United Overseas Bank filed to foreclose on the project last year, but BH3 ended up buying the loan for about $125 million in July.

Manhattan is dealing with a glut of luxury condos thanks to a surge in new construction, which has given investors an opportunity to bail developers out at high interest rates, purchase defaulted loans or take over projects that are not doing well for low prices.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1000  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2020, 6:31 AM
artspook's Avatar
artspook artspook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: manhattan
Posts: 644
hey UTEPman -
. touche´! . . ya brilliantly nailed it . .
love your "vertical sidewalks" description . .
I don't particularly like them either . . they don't, however
"kill anything I would have liked about this building" though . .
. the overall proportion is great . .
& some of the other stuff i mentioned . .
though I'd like 125 Greenwich less, if it were All glass . .
so in that respect, the sidewalks for me, are better than that . .
I wish the bare concrete could've been textured corten steel
(where's there any corten steel on towers in this town ? - nowhere !) . .
limestone would've been nice . . any kind of stone or metal . .
vertical concrete sidewalks, meh . .
__________________
artSpook
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:10 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.