HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8401  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 4:45 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 811
A new light-rail bridge over Lady Bird Lake could allow buses for an extra $60 million, agency says

https://www.kut.org/transportation/2...transit-system
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8402  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 6:33 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX2030 View Post
A new light-rail bridge over Lady Bird Lake could allow buses for an extra $60 million, agency says

https://www.kut.org/transportation/2...transit-system
A tremendously bad idea, especially for a project seeing significant cost increases on parts of the system that are actually necessary.

Even if we had $60M to spare on a bus bridge, this is basically, by definition, the worst possible spot to put it. Because it's almost completely redundant to the 10B light rail system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8403  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 7:20 PM
mtb_jeremy mtb_jeremy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
A tremendously bad idea, especially for a project seeing significant cost increases on parts of the system that are actually necessary.

Even if we had $60M to spare on a bus bridge, this is basically, by definition, the worst possible spot to put it. Because it's almost completely redundant to the 10B light rail system.
That is what I was thinking. Congress or Lavaca/Guadalupe are better north-south paths for a bus through town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8404  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 7:22 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,485
Yeah, I was thinking about redundancy. Not to mention, aesthetically, I don't like the idea of a two-decker bridge, as it were... It works in some contexts, but not there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8405  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 7:43 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,365
This is a horrible idea and it should be fought at every turn.
__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8406  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 8:10 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
A tremendously bad idea, especially for a project seeing significant cost increases on parts of the system that are actually necessary.

Even if we had $60M to spare on a bus bridge, this is basically, by definition, the worst possible spot to put it. Because it's almost completely redundant to the 10B light rail system.
Agreed. If money were no object it would be better spent upgrading the Pleasant Valley Bridge for the rapid bus line. It will primarily serve transit dependent low income/minority riders that do not have a need to go Downtown. The Blue and Orange lines will serve most going Downtown regardless of their demographic profile.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8407  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 9:24 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
Agreed. If money were no object it would be better spent upgrading the Pleasant Valley Bridge for the rapid bus line. It will primarily serve transit dependent low income/minority riders that do not have a need to go Downtown. The Blue and Orange lines will serve most going Downtown regardless of their demographic profile.
Most of our bridges would need no upgrades at all to give our buses first class treatment. All that would be required is some paint and political courage.

I wouldn't be opposed to adding buses to the new bridge if it made our bus network better but I'm not conviced that it actually does.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8408  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 10:06 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
Agreed. If money were no object it would be better spent upgrading the Pleasant Valley Bridge for the rapid bus line. It will primarily serve transit dependent low income/minority riders that do not have a need to go Downtown. The Blue and Orange lines will serve most going Downtown regardless of their demographic profile.
Even if it were free, there's a danger that its very existence would lead to a non-optimal network design for the bus system. That after going to the trouble of constructing an extra wide bridge with bus lanes, CM would feel political or other pressure to make use of it (above and beyond routes that actually make sense).

And since CM's operating budget is severely constrained, this would result in worse service overall (though improved for some minority of riders).

There's very, very few trips that actually see significant benefit from a bus crossing there, especially compared to other geographic locations.

Say you're coming into/out of downtown from directly south. Does this bridge help, no not really, you're better off taking the orange line. It's faster and more frequent.

coming into/out of downtown from the SW? You're probably better off taking either a bus route that hypothetically crosses a bus bridge further west (~S 1st) or riding an E/W connecting line and then transferring to the Orange.

Okay, best case scenario, you're SE of downtown. Far enough out, you're again better off riding e/w and then transferring to the orange, rather than slogging through traffic _almost_ all the way (except the bridge itself). Or if you're riding from SE to E, once you're far enough out you're better crossing at PV (with hopefully bus only lanes). Or some new bus only crossing between 35 and PV.

Even if there's a low frequency coverage route directly overlaying the Blue (remnant of the 20) in most cases you're better off riding that just a short distance and then transferring to the Blue at the next common station.

If it existed, sure routes would use it. Late night after the light rail shuts down (night owl and such) sure. But the overall benefit then is pretty low (less traffic) and not many riders to benefit. Any potential benefit of a crossing there is hurt even more by there not being a N/S arterial between Congress and 35.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8409  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 10:29 PM
sjk sjk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 215
KVUE did a story on the Blue Line:

Project Connect: Renderings show first look at Austin's Blue Line light rail

https://www.kvue.com/article/news/po...JZLHxGhW3nz5GM
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8410  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 10:33 PM
sjk sjk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 215
Project Connect is also live on YouTube now to discuss the project:

Project Connect: Design Workshop - Lady Bird Lake Bridge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SAXUrmTchg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8411  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 11:55 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,598
Watching the presentation now. Pleasantly surprised at how well it seems to work and the potential for reconfiguring bus routes on the east side of Downtown. Potential to integrate commuter buses coming off I-35 and Gold Line and other metro rapid and local bus connections. I'm not opposed to the idea, but is it worth $60 M when everything else is already over budget?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8412  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 11:56 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
What a fantastic piece of infrastructure in every way possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8413  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 12:55 AM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
Potential to integrate commuter buses coming off I-35 and Gold Line and other metro rapid and local bus connections.
The Gold line is going to be light rail. To me, that's an argument against, to pay a bunch of money now for a limited time benefit.

On the metroexpress commuter buses, there's 2 considerations.

1) On the purely selfish side of things, we're talking about city of Austin taxpayers paying a lot of money to the benefit of non-Austin residents. The south Metroexpress park and rides are going to be right at the city limits if not outside the city.

2) I asked but didn't get an answer, I'd be curious about the comparison between riding a metroexpress all the way on I35 vs. transferring to the Orange line at slaughter. Especially at rush hour (which is the main time the metroexpress operate).


And then one final issue they alluded to. Given the CIG evaluation process, to the extent that a bus bridge moves riders from the light rail to buses directly, it could actually hurt the ranking of the orange line.
Kind of silly that it works that way, but less riders on the line the feds are paying for is less riders.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8414  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 1:00 AM
clubtokyo's Avatar
clubtokyo clubtokyo is offline
クラブトクヨ
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,100
Love subway entry and bridge. Really hope Austin can pull this off!
__________________
Let’s keep building up Austin! #letsgetdense
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8415  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 4:58 PM
smallfrie smallfrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 65
I acknowledge that the posters here are citizens who care deeply about the future of Austin and want the best for present and future Austinites in all aspects of livability and egalitarianism. (Although I can't also stop myself from writing that I suspect many posters here are employees of large developers, contractors, A & E, and/or their PR firms - I an truly sorry for that.)

I am not trying to troll but am trying as a faceless resident to put on an independent record - for my own benefit - that I believe the Project Connect subway system will never be built. And if something like a subway is ever built instead, it will be so much smaller and delayed so long as to render the effort absurd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8416  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 5:02 PM
dilliam dilliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 162
Can you list specific reasons or are you just going to put out a statement?

"I suspect many posters here are employees of large developers, contractors, A & E, and/or their PR firms - I and truly sorry for that"
Did you create this conspiracy in your head?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8417  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 5:13 PM
smallfrie smallfrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilliam View Post
Can you list specific reasons or are you just going to put out a statement?

"I suspect many posters here are employees of large developers, contractors, A & E, and/or their PR firms - I and truly sorry for that"
Did you create this conspiracy in your head?
I have no evidence at all; it was created in my head as you say. I tried to apologize in advance although I garbled it; I meant to say "I am truly sorry for that."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8418  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 6:06 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,485
I for one am excited that this is moving forward. And no, I'm not an employee of a large developer. I'm also not a bot. Nor am I an alien. Nor am I politically motivated in 99% of my posts. I'm just a dude who likes smart development. And I play drums, so I'm even honest about that. Moving on....

All said, I like the option without the bus now that I've seen a video of it. I was leaning that way beforehand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8419  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 6:06 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallfrie View Post
(Although I can't also stop myself from writing that I suspect many posters here are employees of large developers, contractors, A & E, and/or their PR firms - I an truly sorry for that.).


I don't think there is anyway we bump the subway however we might have to delay the subway for the orange line south of republic square due to the elongated need identified in design. Of course, it's a little silly to speculate since we are still waiting to see how much additional federal dollars we'll get out of this administration and the infrastructure bill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8420  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 6:07 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallfrie View Post
Although I can't also stop myself from writing that I suspect many posters here are employees of large developers, contractors, A & E, and/or their PR firms
not I, none of the above
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:26 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.