HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1961  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2019, 9:42 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Oct 15



__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1962  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2019, 7:54 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,477
October 17, 2019





     
     
  #1963  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2019, 5:26 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 934
10-19



     
     
  #1964  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2019, 5:17 AM
boeing738's Avatar
boeing738 boeing738 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 35
Some pictures from today (10/19)

110 N. Wacker by jlnd29, on Flickr

110 N. Wacker by jlnd29, on Flickr

110 N. Wacker by jlnd29, on Flickr

Just barely peeking above other buildings, seen from the 7th floor amenity deck at Essex on the Park:
110 N. Wacker by jlnd29, on Flickr
     
     
  #1965  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2019, 10:24 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,033


From today.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
     
     
  #1966  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2019, 1:36 AM
RedCorsair87 RedCorsair87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 519
I'll bite. Which OHC site was that?
     
     
  #1967  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2019, 1:50 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedCorsair87 View Post
I'll bite. Which OHC site was that?
Chicago Temple!
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
     
     
  #1968  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2019, 2:20 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolarWind View Post
October 17, 2019


Holy precarious porty potties! I hope those are anchored, what a horrible way to go. Wind gust taking you over the side while taking a dump.
     
     
  #1969  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2019, 3:15 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Holy precarious porty potties! I hope those are anchored, what a horrible way to go. Wind gust taking you over the side while taking a dump.


almost as bad as the Jurassic Park treatment.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
     
     
  #1970  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2019, 3:42 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,368
Thought the exact same thing.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
     
     
  #1971  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2019, 4:01 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post

From today.
Thank you for this shot, i had never seen 120 Lasalle before from above. What an odd building. I like it. Lived here all my life and think i know the skyline pretty well but had no idea about this one.
     
     
  #1972  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2019, 2:07 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,416
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/comm...looks-cash-out

October 22, 2019 12:11 PM updated 8 hours ago

Developer in downtown tower project looks to cash out
Howard Hughes is putting its stake in the new skyscraper under construction at 110 N. Wacker Drive up for sale amid a big corporate shift.

Danny Ecker


Quote:
Quote:
One of the developers behind a new 55-story skyscraper rising on Wacker Drive is looking to sell its stake in the project more than a year before the building is set to be completed.

Amid an executive shakeup and shift in strategy, Howard Hughes aims to unload the property at 110 N. Wacker Drive, the company disclosed in a presentation to investors.

The value of Howard Hughes' stake in the project, which it is developing with Chicago-based Riverside Investment & Development, is unclear. But the publicly traded company said it expects to sell the building as well as other "non-core" assets totaling about $2 billion in value over the next 12 to 18 months.

The skyscraper will cost around $722 million to build, and the joint venture developing the property increased its construction loan in May to $558 million, according to Howard Hughes' second-quarter earnings report. Howard Hughes guarantees around $100 million of that loan, the report said.
Quote:
Howard Hughes, which was spun out of mall owner General Growth Properties in 2010, paid $12.3 million in 2014 for the 43,000-square-foot parcel of land beneath what was then a squat General Growth building at 110 N. Wacker.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #1973  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2019, 2:22 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Oct 19















__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1974  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 5:25 AM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 934
10-24 ~12am Getting ready for bed and someone either stole the keys to the crane or they are working the graveyard shift. I've been watching for a few minutes and there is activity on the southwest corner of the core. It appears to be someone welding and also the crane is moving quite a bit. Also I apologize for the blurriness, I did the best I could with the iphone zoom.





     
     
  #1975  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 5:21 PM
BrinChi BrinChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 446
Is it just me, or does this not look any taller than 150 N Riverside? Will there be 60 feet of steel structure above the core?
     
     
  #1976  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 5:35 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrinChi View Post
Is it just me, or does this not look any taller than 150 N Riverside? Will there be 60 feet of steel structure above the core?
It still has a bit to go - in the second shot you can see the rebar at the top - bent over - the concrete will go at least this high. would be surprised if ther is not also a significant mechanical screen.

Oct 22





Oct 23

All 3 towers (444, 150, and 110) are about equidistant in this shot.
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1977  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 7:24 PM
ChiRaz ChiRaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Here's the blown up version if it helps
Hopefully I got the image of the Goettsch elevation PD from post #1109 on page 55 to show up here for reference. It looks as though the top of the roof is to be at approx 783' (under which will be the Level 56 mechanical floor). Assuming that is where current core top is - at 783'? If so, there would be another approx. 14' to the top of the screen (approx 797') and then another approx 17' for the penthouse portion (which gets to 814'). So potentially 31 more feet to go if my current core height assumption is correct!
     
     
  #1978  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2019, 7:54 PM
BrinChi BrinChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 446
^ thank you both for your analysis! Makes sense. I understand that the difference between a 750' and an 814' building won't be very obvious, but I was expecting it to at least be noticeable!
     
     
  #1979  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2019, 2:03 AM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 521
This thing is gonna have high performance vision glass on the upper levels? LOL

Last edited by bhawk66; Oct 25, 2019 at 1:57 PM.
     
     
  #1980  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2019, 5:27 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,477
October 23, 2019

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.