Quote:
Originally Posted by EastSideHBG
One counterpoint here is that if you push too far you end up losing long-term residents to the 'burbs and that could start to backfire over time. I am not making a case against densifying and some of the arguments can be ridiculous but I think overdevelopment for development's sake can be detrimental and the overall character of the neighborhood should be taken into consideration. I am a fan of the more hybrid neighborhoods, though, and Roxborough immediately comes to mind when I think of an example of this.
It's a tough line to walk and I can see both sides of the coin here, especially when you consider how crappy some of these apartment buildings become over time.
|
It's true that the developers that are operating here have been putting up really crap designs-- one developer in particular has been prolific on Ridge Ave and their designs are what 19th century architecture critics used to call "very terrible". They did restore a couple of historic buildings as part of their developments but their buildings are horribly designed.
Quote:
Don't get me started on East Falls. Actual quote from the meetings when Ridge Flats was first proposed: 'Where will I park when I'm running in to get a slice of pizza from Slices?" NW Philly will be dragged kicking and screaming into density.
|
Here are some actual quotes from Roxborough residents about development:
"Our way of life is being destroyed" (in reference to a four-story apartment building being built on a 100% impermeable retail pad site that was contaminated)
"People will park in front of my house" (a Wissahickon Hills resident, where all 406 homes have driveways and garages)
"Stop building towers!" (in reference to a four story building)
Ridge Park Civic Association has been having fundraisers to pay lawyers to appeal by-right developments. One single family home project was held in litigation for years.