HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


    130 North Franklin in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2022, 11:56 PM
Kamms Kamms is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 1
There’s 2 lots here with W. Court Pl cutting thru the middle of the site. Hoping with a new plan we’ll see the smaller, north lot go residential/hotel >1000’ and the south lot along Washington can be your 800’ office building.

Always seemed like an odd site to combine for one fat ass tower IMO. Maybe as demand creeps up like we’re seeing, someone could see my vision thru.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 7:54 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
This project is still alive, and damn do the new renderings look good!

PD: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/gisimage...pds/PD1293.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 8:13 PM
mh777 mh777 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
This project is still alive, and damn do the new renderings look good!

PD: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/gisimage...pds/PD1293.pdf
Woah! Looks like they were granted a 1 year extension to find an anchor tenant. JP Morgan Chase anyone?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 8:17 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Very nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #685  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 8:26 PM
rgarri4's Avatar
rgarri4 rgarri4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,030
Nice. I like the interchanging terraces. It'll bring some variety to the loop. I kinda wish there were more of them, however then it would start to look like those Aqua copycats in Toronto.
__________________
Renderings, Animations, VR
Youtube
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 8:49 PM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
Still too short. Needs to be 900 feet or taller to stand out...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 8:58 PM
thegoatman thegoatman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeshoredrive View Post
Still too short. Needs to be 900 feet or taller to stand out...
if there was a west loop-esque boom happening downtown I would say that, but its been quiet as hell development wise over there so we better just take what we can get...

if this was any other city, a 700 footer would be skyline changing. But here it's just infill. Either way, hope to see this massive vacant lot bite the dust
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 9:29 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh777 View Post
Woah! Looks like they were granted a 1 year extension to find an anchor tenant. JP Morgan Chase anyone?
If that does happen I hope they go much taller. 730' in the middle of the Chicago loop is so underwhelming. Insofar that a 12 - 1,300 footer would really be more ideal.


The terraces do look cool though, other than that it's just a blue box. Way too many blue boxes in this area.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Nov 25, 2022 at 9:59 PM. Reason: Trolling
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #689  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2022, 11:57 PM
Ricochet48 Ricochet48 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 189
Wow love the wavy terraces, this new render looks great! Hope it gets built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 2:55 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 4,215
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 3:02 PM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Phenomenal if they build it. I'm so scared of the VE axe though. But this is great news that they've actively put some serious time into the redesign. That 20th floor roof/restaurant whatever would be a 10/10 as would be the terraced gardens on the lower floors.

Is there any info on square footage? I didn't see any in the pdf. I'm gonna guess 1.3 million as those bottom floor plates are very bulky. I would love to see a hotel component on this site but I'll take this any day.

Last edited by rivernorthlurker; Nov 26, 2022 at 6:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 3:14 PM
UrbanDweller98 UrbanDweller98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 58
730' at this location is so meh. The terraces and sky garden are cool at least, hopefully it won't be dumbed down if they find a tenant.

Still hoping JP Morgan Chase chooses this location and gives us a 900' signature Tower...one can hope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 3:56 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
That big terrace is pretty cool, but the rest of it reminds me of a regular glass box apartment or condo building.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 5:28 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
That big terrace is pretty cool, but the rest of it reminds me of a regular glass box apartment or condo building.
That’s my sentiment. I need to see renderings of the other side. The flat facade comes off as extremely boring. I almost hope Related/WL lands Chase, but we’ll see.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 5:58 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
]
Thank Pizza God that ultra-boring placeholder design in the middle is gone forever.

The new design looks promising, but as someone else mentioned, it looks ripe for the VE hatchet.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 6:20 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
The middle design was super boring, glad that's no longer a thing.

The balconies of the new one kind of remind me of something out of Singapore, they're pretty cool and I hope they remain untouched.

It's sad how negative everything is surrounding development is these days. A semi decent proposal arises and the immediate (yet unfortunately realistic) reaction is that it must be too good to be true and we'll be VE'd to death.


Quote:
Still hoping JP Morgan Chase chooses this location and gives us a 900' signature Tower...one can hope.
Given their baller NYC tower, they go big, and have deep pockets.

900' is also meh and really is not much on the global stage these days, or in Chicago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 6:23 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
That’s my sentiment. I need to see renderings of the other side. The flat facade comes off as extremely boring. I almost hope Related/WL lands Chase, but we’ll see.
Yeah for sure. I think for JPMC, it would be somewhat of a statement piece. Probably not as good as the under construction new NYC HQ building, but it has to be visible. Word on the street is that Dimon wanted to compete with the new B of A and BMO buildings right? So why would JPMC abandon their 850 foot tower for a 730 foot one that's even less visible? The West Loop space makes more sense from that specific to be honest, unless they want to add about 300 more feet onto this one.

And yeah the top portion is incredibly boxy and boring. The bottom portion is only cool because of that cool terrace portion. And the terraces up from an office perspective aren't even practical for a lot. In one of my company's buildings in NYC, there's a big terrace on the 16th floor but we never once used it out of abundance of caution/danger. They refused any of us to step out there.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 10:11 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
So why would JPMC abandon their 850 foot tower for a 730 foot one that's even less visible? The West Loop space makes more sense from that specific to be honest, unless they want to add about 300 more feet onto this one.
Yea it's a total waste of a site, but it's not known whether Chase will anchor it. If they do, hopefully they'll want a signature tower in the area, being Chase.

They'll probably put a logo on it though (which I personally wouldn't mind).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #699  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 11:36 PM
rgarri4's Avatar
rgarri4 rgarri4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,030
Was there ever an impression that there would be an 800' or higher skyscraper here? From what I've seen all of the proposals from the past 10 or so years have always been around the same height.
__________________
Renderings, Animations, VR
Youtube
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #700  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2022, 11:51 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgarri4 View Post
Was there ever an impression that there would be an 800' or higher skyscraper here? From what I've seen all of the proposals from the past 10 or so years have always been around the same height.
No, people on the forum just wished it would be taller
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.