HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2009, 9:10 AM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by nergie View Post
Allen,

Thanks for the help, please PM. I don't want the moderator to think I have hijacked the thread.

Cheers
Don't worry about it, this thread is usually pretty dead anyways, it could use a little more talk, and since you'd be talking about Vancouver it wouldn't be all that off-topic anyways. But the best place to find out some info would be in the SSP:Local Vancouver subforum in the Canada section. You could start your own thread in the "General" section and I'm sure a ton of our Vancouver forumers would be happy to throw out some suggestions.

SSP:Local Vancouver - http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/foru...hp?forumid=161
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2009, 9:12 AM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen View Post
Another one I know very well is "ADERA"....do you know that one. I've been to a lot of their developments. Also, "ASPAC" should be on your list too! That was the one who planned the Coal Harbour 15 years ago...now Vancouver Waterfront is a great place with awesome buildings. I think that is the company who did "2 Harbour Green"...I just visited that place a week ago. And now they are going to Richmond Oval and develop that waterfront community. It's called the "River Green"....I should start a thread on that.
Thanks for the extra info. I don't think I've heard of ADERA but I have heard of ASPAC. I'm sure there are a few other prominent developers that I forgot in my list.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2009, 7:01 PM
metroXpress's Avatar
metroXpress metroXpress is offline
(||||||-||||-||||||)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by raggedy13 View Post
Thanks for the extra info. I don't think I've heard of ADERA but I have heard of ASPAC. I'm sure there are a few other prominent developers that I forgot in my list.
Adera is more of the Metro Vancouver Area....the current development sites they have in Vancouver would be in UBC....they are called "Pacific Spirit" and "Pathways"...
__________________
"Think simple…reduce the whole
of its parts into the simplest terms,
Getting back to first principles"


~ FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2009, 5:12 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
Updated Feb 26 to reflect cancelation of Ritz Carlton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2009, 3:48 AM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,446
Here's a great construction update care of Delirium:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delirium View Post
here's a bunch of pics i took this morning. crappy lighting outside.. sorry bout that.

1022 living. i like the dark glass on the commercial podium.


vita






Atelier. i love the podium. it's huge and has a big impact along homer..






woodward's




cbc redevelopment




tv towers


i like the grey stone being installed. this will be a waterfall when complete








Raffles - robson street frontage


Raffles - cambie frontage


renovated building in yaletown


Donovan


notice the balcony railings? blah. but the stone base is nice. didn't expect that.


looks like reno's are starting at the best western on granville


granville street




on a sunny day..

all photos by me
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2009, 12:03 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
Updated April 10 with proposal for Davie and Bidwell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted May 3, 2009, 6:42 AM
migol24 migol24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, Austin
Posts: 1,602
vancouver is so beautiful. i hear austin was going to be replicated after vancouver. and apparently one of the architects based in vancouver designed one of our buildings which has already topped out. the buildings website says that the designer is responsible for most of vancouver's landscape. (here's the link to the website www.springaustin.com )

and considering the only similarity of the spring is it's tall thin structure that makes it seem taller... given none of the other buildings proposed or under construction here in austin has that distinction. i see the same traits on some of these skyscrapers posted on here.

vancouver on the other hand is more like a concept... like the entire city was designed by one mind... or the rest of the designers followed the same idea. i particulary like the last picture posted. i hope to visit someday... and as a matter of fact i've looked into going to vancouver film school... actually i'm about to pop in a dvd of their brochure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted May 22, 2009, 9:34 AM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
Updated first page with 1372 Seymour proposal
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2009, 12:35 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,836
Unhappy nice buildings in Vancouver, BUT . . . . . .

It's true that Vancouver has an amazing skyline for a city of its size. It's also true that we have some very interesting pieces of high-rise architecture in the city. What worries me is that these is a "ameness" developing in many of the new buildings, both office towers, and residential towers alike. The style of Vancouver is modern and interesting, but what the city lacks is real elegance in its high-rises (readers will disagree loudly, no doubt . . . . )
To give you an example of several truly elegant high-rise buildings, take two
examples from Montreal.

The first is the "Tour de la Bourse" (formerly called Place Victoria).
The second is the "Château Champlain" hotel.
Both were built in the late 1960s, but look as timeless now as they did then.
Our buildings are great, but are often a bit overzealous in their use of kooky angles, and furthermore, little attempt is made to harmonise with the neighbouring buildings, resulting in a "hodge-podge" effect.

So please, go to the Montreal page, and take a look. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2009, 9:36 PM
TOBoy TOBoy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 701
I actually dont like Tour de la Bourse, but whatever.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2009, 1:18 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,836
Smile "There is no dispute in taste"

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOBoy View Post
I actually dont like Tour de la Bourse, but whatever.
It's all a matter of taste, of course. Nevertheless, Tour de la Bourse is still considered one of the most elegant examples of the International Style.

Regarding the Château Champlain (and this is my opinion only) it still has the same ultra-classy elegance now that it had when finished in 1966. It
isn't particularly tall - less than 40 stories - but makes an architectural statement that is both bold, daring, yet dignified and classical, all at once.

One major building in Montreal that I DON'T care for (and I'd like to hear your opinion) is the the one on de la Gauchetière Street. I forget the address.
It's that peaked roof that puts me off. And it's currently the tallest in the city, too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2009, 2:51 PM
metroXpress's Avatar
metroXpress metroXpress is offline
(||||||-||||-||||||)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 2,220
^ even Hotel Vancouver is very chic:

__________________
"Think simple…reduce the whole
of its parts into the simplest terms,
Getting back to first principles"


~ FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2009, 1:01 AM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
Updated July 31

Added 1134 Burrard Proposal

Last edited by Hed Kandi; Aug 1, 2009 at 2:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2009, 3:03 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
updated first page - aug 22
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2009, 3:37 PM
metroXpress's Avatar
metroXpress metroXpress is offline
(||||||-||||-||||||)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 2,220
thanks for the updates
__________________
"Think simple…reduce the whole
of its parts into the simplest terms,
Getting back to first principles"


~ FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2009, 1:57 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
Added rendering of Cosmo on first page - Aug.28
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2009, 1:58 AM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
Updated first page of thread, October 6
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2009, 6:15 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,161
Updated first page of thread - Nov.14
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2009, 6:53 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,318
thanks for keeping things up to date man!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2009, 8:00 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,836
Smile belated response

Quote:
Originally Posted by metroXpress View Post
^ even Hotel Vancouver is very chic:

In fact, yes. While many people lament, and rightly so, the demolition of the first Hotel Vancouver, the current one is more elegant in structure, and could fit in any major North American city; NYC, Chicago, SF,....
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.